ABSTRACT
Background Multiple studies have shown that the state of stress has a negative impact on decision-making, the cardiovascular system, and the autonomic nervous system [1]. In light of this, we have developed a mobile application in order to assess user stress levels based on the state of their physiological systems. This assessment is based on heart rate variability [2], [3], [4], [5], which many wearable devices such as Apple Watch have learned to measure in the background. We developed a proprietary algorithm that assesses stress levels based on heart rate variability analysis, and this research paper shows that assessments positively correlate with subjective feelings of stress experienced by users.
Objective The objective of this paper is to study the relationship between HRV-based physiological stress responses and Perceived Stress Questionnaire self-assessments in order to validate Welltory measurements as a tool that can be used for daily stress measurements.
Setting We analyzed data from Welltory app users, which is publicly available and free of charge. The app allows users to complete the Perceived Stress Questionnaire and take heart rate variability measurements, either with Apple Watch or with their smartphone cameras.
Subjects To conduct our study, we collected all questionnaire results from users between the ages of 25 and 60 who also took a heart rate variability measurement on the same day, after filling out the Questionnaire. In total, this research paper includes results from 1,471 participants (602 men and 869 women).
Measurements We quantitatively measured physiological stress based on AMo, pNN50, and MedSD values, which were calculated based on sequences of RR-intervals recorded with the Welltory app. We assessed psychological stress levels based on the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) [6], [7].
Results Physiological stress reliably correlates with self-assessed psychological stress levels - low for subjects with low psychological stress levels, medium for subjects with medium psychological stress levels, and high for subjects with high psychological stress levels. On a scale of 0-100%, median physiological stress is 48.7 (95% CI of 45.2-50.7%), 56.4 (95% CI of 54.3-58.9), and 62.5 (95% CI of 59.7-66.3) for these groups, respectively.
Conclusions Physiological stress response, which is calculated based on heart rate variability analysis, on average increases as psychological stress increases. Our results show that HRV measurements significantly correlate with perceived psychological stress, and can therefore be used as a stress assessment tool.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors of this study report personal fees from consulting agreements from Welltory Inc., during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Welltory Inc., outside the submitted work.
Funding Statement
The study is supported by Welltory Inc.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Welltory Local Ethics Committee C-003/2020 has reviewed the study named 'Smartphone App Stress Assessments: Heart Rate Variability vs Perceived Stress in a Large Group of Adults', presented by the committee secretary Yana Tatchina, on 19.12.2020 and provided their approval, signed on the Protocol #3 by December 19, 2020, attached. The study was considered the one involving no more than minimal risk to human subjects because it is based on retrospective and anonymized data. The Welltory Local Ethics Committee C-003/2020 is formed with members who do not have any affiliation with the authors, the study, or Welltory, Inc. All of the ethics committee members have declared that there is no conflict of interest. The signature pages with each approval, declaration of not having any affiliations, contacts, and research profiles of all ethics committee members are attached to this study. The list of The Welltory Local Ethics Committee C-003/2020 members who provided their approval with Protocol #3 by December 19, 2020: 1. Evgeniia Sotnikova, PhD in Mathematics, Novosibirsk State University 2. Nikolay Teslya, PhD in Software Engineering, ITMO university 3. Kseniya Solovyeva, Doctor of Philosophy, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology 4. Tatiana Logvinenko, a Specialist degree in Clinical Psychology 5. Dmitry Repin, PhD in Cognitive Neuroscience, Boston University 6. Valery Ilinsky, a Specialist degree in biology, The European Society of Human Genetics 7. Alexei Gratchev, MD, Doctor of oncology, N.N. Blokhin Cancer Research Center 8. Andrey Perfilev, MD, an expert in personalized medicine, Atlas Biomed Group Limited
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
