Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States

View ORCID ProfileMatthew L. Romo, View ORCID ProfileRebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, View ORCID ProfileAmanda Berry, William You, View ORCID ProfileChloe Mirzayi, View ORCID ProfileDrew Westmoreland, Angela M. Parcesepe, View ORCID ProfileLevi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, View ORCID ProfileMcKaylee Robertson, View ORCID ProfileAndrew R. Maroko, View ORCID ProfileChristian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248747
Matthew L. Romo
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthew L. Romo
Rebecca Zimba
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rebecca Zimba
Sarah Kulkarni
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Berry
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amanda Berry
William You
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chloe Mirzayi
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chloe Mirzayi
Drew Westmoreland
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Drew Westmoreland
Angela M. Parcesepe
3Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599 USA
4Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Levi Waldron
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Levi Waldron
Madhura Rane
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shivani Kochhar
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
McKaylee Robertson
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for McKaylee Robertson
Andrew R. Maroko
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
5Department of Environmental, Occupational, and Geospatial Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew R. Maroko
Christian Grov
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
6Department of Community Health and Social Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christian Grov
Denis Nash
1Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (ISPH), City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY, 10027 USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: denis.nash@sph.cuny.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In order to understand preferences about SARS-CoV-2 testing, we conducted a discrete choice experiment among 4793 participants in the Communities, Households, and SARS-CoV-2 Epidemiology (CHASING COVID) Cohort Study from July 30-September 8, 2020. We used latent class analysis to identify distinct patterns of preferences related to testing and conducted a simulation to predict testing uptake if additional testing scenarios were offered. Five distinct patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing emerged. “Comprehensive testers” (18.9%) ranked specimen type as most important and favored less invasive specimen types, with saliva most preferred, and also ranked venue and result turnaround time as highly important, with preferences for home testing and fast result turnaround time. “Fast track testers” (26.0%) ranked result turnaround time as most important and favored immediate and same day turnaround time. “Dual testers” (18.5%) ranked test type as most important and preferred both antibody and viral tests. “Non-invasive dual testers” (33.0%) ranked specimen type and test type as similarly most important, preferring cheek swab specimen type and both antibody and viral tests. “Home testers” (3.6%) ranked venue as most important and favored home-based testing. By offering less invasive (saliva specimen type), dual testing (both viral and antibody tests), and at home testing scenarios in addition to standard testing scenarios, simulation models predicted that testing uptake would increase from 81.7% to 98.1%. We identified substantial differences in preferences for SARS-CoV-2 testing and found that offering additional testing options, which consider this heterogeneity, would likely increase testing uptake.

SIGNIFICANCE During the COVID-19 pandemic, diagnostic testing has allowed for early detection of cases and implementation of measures to reduce community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Understanding individuals’ preferences about testing and the service models that deliver tests are relevant in efforts to increase and sustain uptake of SARS-CoV-2 testing, which, despite vaccine availability, will be required for the foreseeable future. We identified substantial differences in preferences for SARS-CoV-2 testing in a discrete choice experiment among a large national cohort of adults in the US. Offering additional testing options that account for or anticipate this heterogeneity in preferences (e.g., both viral and antibody tests, at home testing), would likely increase testing uptake.

Classification Biological Sciences (major); Psychological and Cognitive Sciences (minor)

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://cunyisph.org/chasing-covid/

Funding Statement

Funding for this project is provided by the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (cunyisph.org), the COVID-19 Grant Program of the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, and the National Institute Of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UH3AI133675.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy Institutional Review Board

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • CONTACT AND COMPETING INTEREST INFORMATION Matthew L. Romo (matthew.romo{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Rebecca Zimba (rebecca.zimba{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Sarah Kulkarni (sarah.kulkarni{at}sph.cuny.edu), Amanda Berry (amanda.berry{at}sph.cuny.edu;, William You (william.you{at}sph.cuny.edu), Chloe Mirzayi (chloe.mirzayi{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Drew Westmoreland (drew.westmoreland{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Angela M. Parcesepe (parcesep{at}live.unc.edu), Levi Waldron (levi.waldron{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Madhura Rane (madhura.rane{at}sph.cuny.edu), Shivani Kochhar (shivani.kochhar{at}sph.cuny.edu), McKaylee Robertson (mckaylee.robertson{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Andrew R Maroko (andrew.maroko{at}sph.cuny.edu;, Christian Grov (christian.grov{at}sph.cuny.edu), and Denis Nash (denis.nash{at}sph.cuny.edu)

  • We have no competing interests.

Data Availability

De-identified data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 24, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States
Matthew L. Romo, Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela M. Parcesepe, Levi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, McKaylee Robertson, Andrew R. Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20248747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248747
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 testing preferences in a national cohort in the United States
Matthew L. Romo, Rebecca Zimba, Sarah Kulkarni, Amanda Berry, William You, Chloe Mirzayi, Drew Westmoreland, Angela M. Parcesepe, Levi Waldron, Madhura Rane, Shivani Kochhar, McKaylee Robertson, Andrew R. Maroko, Christian Grov, Denis Nash, for the CHASING COVID Cohort Study Team
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20248747; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20248747

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (50)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
  • Epidemiology (5219)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (195)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (750)
  • Geriatric Medicine (77)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (694)
  • Health Policy (352)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5823)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
  • Medical Education (102)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (758)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (475)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (94)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (139)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (854)
  • Public and Global Health (1995)
  • Radiology and Imaging (345)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (157)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (75)
  • Surgery (108)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)