Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Aesthetic evaluation of the need for orthodontic treatment – Perception among university students

Luís Alves, Anca Mesaros, Maria João Ponces, Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20244806
Luís Alves
1DDS, MSc, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anca Mesaros
2DDS, PhD, Department of Dental Propaedeutics and Aesthetics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Iuliu Ha□ieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria João Ponces
3DDS, MSc, PhD, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
3DDS, MSc, PhD, Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mpollmann@fmd.up.pt
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Aesthetics is a relevant part of procedures in healthcare, often influencing treatment planning in tandem with a healthy function. Orthodontic treatment (OT) is one of many solutions and is, sometimes, wanted purely for aesthetic reasons. In 1989, Brook and Shaw proposed the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN), which has been largely used.

This study aims to verify the main motivations of university students to look for OT and, based on the Aesthetic Component of the IOTN, weigh the aesthetics influence to seek for it. It was compared the opinion of students from various areas of study - Dentistry, Science and Nature (ScN), Arts and Humanity (AtH) - at the beginning (Initiated Students) and end (Advanced Students) of their graduation; the same question was also analysed taking into account their nationalities and training schools.

Materials and Methods In a collaboration between the University of Porto (Portugal) and the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Cluj-Napoca (Romania), a sample of 1071 individuals was gathered. Participants responded to an online survey, based on IOTN pictures, about what would motivate them to seek OT. The ratings were analysed using the T-Test and alpha error of 5%.

Results The results showed that the total Dentistry students registered a higher Oral Esthetical Sensibility (OES) than the total ScN and AtH students. All groups, except Dentistry Advanced Students, registered a higher OES for Self-Perception than for Perception of Others.

Discussion Among other factors, the pictures used from the IOTN, taken in 1989, may have influenced the participants’ responses. However, it is the most used index, and it is validated.

Conclusion In conclusion, for the studied populations, the main motivations for OT demand are primarily and respectively in this order: functional reasons, doctor’s advice, and aesthetical reasons. OES is influenced by Dentistry studies, specifically in Advanced Students. OES is not influenced by the country of the students’ origin nor the country they are graduating at.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was supported

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The inquiry was approved by the Ethics Commission of FMDUP and the UP's Data Protection Office, being the verdict valid to the Dean's office of UMF (annexes section - The original Portuguese document was issued on 03/01/2020 and is available upon request. The English translation was issued on 17/12/2020). The study was part of a Master's Degree Research Thesis for the University of Porto in collaboration with the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Cluj-Napoca, therefore before any chance of being published by MedRXiv, it was already validated and authorized by both institutions and their respective Ethics Commission/Dean's Office. All participants collaborated voluntarily and anonymously.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • 1 Email: up201505219{at}fmd.up.pt, luiseggalves{at}gmail.com

  • 2 mesaros.anca{at}umfcluj.ro,

  • 3 mponces{at}fmd.up.pt,

  • Funding Source: None

  • Financial Disclosure: Nothing to disclose

  • Conflict of Interest: None

  • Sub Title topics were added to the Abstract. The Distribution/Reuse Options have been revised. Anyone can share this material, provided it remains unaltered in any way, this is not done for commercial purposes, and the original authors are credited and cited.

Data Availability

All data is available when requested via email to up201505219{at}fmd.up.pt

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 21, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Aesthetic evaluation of the need for orthodontic treatment – Perception among university students
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Aesthetic evaluation of the need for orthodontic treatment – Perception among university students
Luís Alves, Anca Mesaros, Maria João Ponces, Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20244806; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20244806
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Aesthetic evaluation of the need for orthodontic treatment – Perception among university students
Luís Alves, Anca Mesaros, Maria João Ponces, Maria Cristina Figueiredo Pollmann
medRxiv 2020.12.22.20244806; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.22.20244806

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (199)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (492)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (90)
  • Dermatology (57)
  • Emergency Medicine (169)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (214)
  • Epidemiology (5722)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (217)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (872)
  • Geriatric Medicine (89)
  • Health Economics (232)
  • Health Informatics (768)
  • Health Policy (395)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (254)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (185)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6527)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (393)
  • Medical Education (118)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (93)
  • Neurology (851)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (142)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (164)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (263)
  • Oncology (516)
  • Ophthalmology (165)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (107)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (252)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (147)
  • Primary Care Research (114)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (981)
  • Public and Global Health (2250)
  • Radiology and Imaging (378)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (313)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (82)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)