Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Further development of spinal cord retreatment dose estimation: including radiotherapy with protons and light ions

Joshua W. Moore, View ORCID ProfileThomas E. Woolley, John W. Hopewell, Bleddyn Jones
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.20248585
Joshua W. Moore
1School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas E. Woolley
1School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas E. Woolley
John W. Hopewell
2Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bleddyn Jones
2Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3Gray Laboratory, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Research Campus, Oxford, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Bleddyn.Jones@oncology.ox.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

A new graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to aid in the assessment of changes in the radiation tolerance of spinal cord/similar central nervous system tissues with time between two treatment courses. The GUI allows any combination of photons, protons (or ions) to be used as the initial, or retreatment, course. Allowances for clinical circumstances, of reduced tolerance, can also be made. The radiobiological model was published previously and has been incorporated with additional checks and safety features, to be as conservative as possible. The proton option includes use of a fixed RBE of 1.1 (set as the default), or a variable RBE, the latter depending on the proton linear energy transfer (LET) for organs at risk. This second LET-based approach can also be used for ions, by changing the LET parameters. GUI screenshots are used to show the input and output parameters for clinical situations used in worked examples from previous publications, where the proton and ion treatments required additional ‘longhand’ calculations. The results from the GUI are in agreement with previously published calculations, but the results are now rapidly available without tedious and error-prone manual computations. The software outputs provide a maximum dose limit boundary, which should not be exceeded. Clinicians may also choose a lower number of treatment fractions, whilst using the same dose per fraction (or conversely a lower dose per fraction but with the same number of fractions) in order to achieve the intended clinical benefit. The new GUI will allow rational estimations of time related radiation tolerance changes in the spinal cord and similar central nervous tissues (optic chiasm, brainstem), which can be used to guide the choice of retreatment dose fractionation schedules.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

JWM acknowledges the support of Cardiff University via funding from the Cardiff Undergraduate Research Opportunities Programme (CUROP) 2019 and Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarships (KESS2).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NA

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data used in this study is sourced from prior works which are referenced throughout the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 22, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Further development of spinal cord retreatment dose estimation: including radiotherapy with protons and light ions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Further development of spinal cord retreatment dose estimation: including radiotherapy with protons and light ions
Joshua W. Moore, Thomas E. Woolley, John W. Hopewell, Bleddyn Jones
medRxiv 2020.12.20.20248585; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.20248585
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Further development of spinal cord retreatment dose estimation: including radiotherapy with protons and light ions
Joshua W. Moore, Thomas E. Woolley, John W. Hopewell, Bleddyn Jones
medRxiv 2020.12.20.20248585; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.20248585

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (142)
  • Anesthesia (46)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (415)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (70)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (144)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (171)
  • Epidemiology (4855)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (183)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (676)
  • Geriatric Medicine (70)
  • Health Economics (192)
  • Health Informatics (629)
  • Health Policy (320)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (203)
  • Hematology (85)
  • HIV/AIDS (156)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5339)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (330)
  • Medical Education (93)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (75)
  • Neurology (686)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (126)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (208)
  • Oncology (439)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (89)
  • Pain Medicine (35)
  • Palliative Medicine (16)
  • Pathology (129)
  • Pediatrics (194)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (84)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (780)
  • Public and Global Health (1816)
  • Radiology and Imaging (324)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (138)
  • Respiratory Medicine (255)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (62)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (37)