ABSTRACT
Having an optimal quality of vision as well as adequate cognitive capacities is known to be essential for driving safety. However, the interaction between vision and cognitive mechanisms while driving remains unclear. We hypothesized that, in a context of high cognitive load, reduced visual acuity would have a negative impact on driving behavior, even when the acuity corresponds to the legal threshold for obtaining a driving license in Canada, and that the impact observed on driving performance would be greater with the increase in the threshold of degradation of visual acuity. In order to investigate this relationship, we examined driving behavior in a driving simulator under optimal and reduced vision conditions through two scenarios involving different levels of cognitive demand. These were: 1. a simple rural driving scenario with some pre-programmed events and 2. a highway driving scenario accompanied by a concurrent task involving the use of a navigation device. Two groups of visual quality degradation (lower/ higher) were evaluated according to their driving behavior. The results support the hypothesis: Driving behavior was less stable under reduced visual quality in the context of a high cognitive load and this effect was exacerbated when visual quality was more severely altered. These results support the idea that visual quality degradation impacts driving behavior when combined with a high mental workload driving environment while specifying that this impact is not present in the context of low cognitive load driving condition.
Competing Interest Statement
I have read the journals policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests (2): 1. author DB is an adjunct professor of the NSERC/Essilor Chair, RDC NSERC-Essilor project at the Universite de Montreal and is employed by Essilor Canada as research project manager, 2. CooperVision provided equipment precisely the contact lenses used for the degradation of visual quality of participants. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, NSERC Essilor Industrial Research Chair (IRCPJ 305729 13), Research and development cooperatif NSERC, Essilor Grant (CRDPJ 533187, 2018), Prompt (https://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/index_eng.asp & https://www.essilor.ca). The funders provided support in the form of salary for author DB but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Authors LM and AP received support from student awards from the Road Safety Research Network (Reseau de Recherche en Securite Routiere) of Quebec (https://rrsr.ca/en). CooperVision provided support in the form of equipment, precisely the contact lenses used for the degradation of visual quality of participants, but had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Experimental procedures were approved by the health research ethics committee at Universite de Montreal (Comite d ethique de la recherche clinique (CERC); certificate N18 090 CERES D).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
