Abstract
Background Digital biomarkers (DB) as captured using sensors embedded in modern smart devices are a promising technology for home-based symptom monitoring in Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Objective Despite extensive application in recent studies test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of DB has not been well addressed in this context. We utilized the large-scale m-Power dataset to establish the test-retest reliability and longitudinal stability of gait, balance, voice and tapping tasks in an unsupervised and self-administered daily life setting in PD patients and healthy volunteers.
Methods Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were computed to estimate the test-retest reliability of features that also differentiate between PD and healthy volunteers. In addition, we tested for longitudinal stability of DB measures in PD and HC as well as for their sensitivity to PD medication effects.
Results Among the features differing between PD and HC, only few tapping and voice features had good to excellent test-retest reliabilities and medium to large effect sizes. All other features performed poorly in this respect. Only few features were sensitive to medication effects. The longitudinal analyses revealed significant alterations over time across a variety of features and in particular for the tapping task.
Conclusions These results indicate the need for further development of more standardized, sensitive and reliable DB for application in self-administered remote studies in PD patients. Motivational, learning and other confounds may cause a variation in performance that needs to be considered in DB longitudinal applications.
Competing Interest Statement
JD is a former employee and received consultancy fees on another topic from F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG. All authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the work presented in this study.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the Human Brain Project, funded from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 785907 (Human Brain Project SGA2).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical oversight of the m-Power study was obtained from Western Institutional Review Board. Prior to signing an electronically rendered traditional informed consent form, prospective participants had to pass a five-question quiz evaluating their understanding of the study aims, participant rights, and data sharing options. After completing the e-consent process and electronically signing the informed consent form, participants were asked for an email address to which their signed consent form was sent and allowing for verification of their enrollment in the study. Participants were given the option to share their data only with the mPower study team and partners ('share narrowly') or to share their data more broadly with qualified researchers worldwide, and had to make an active choice to complete the consent process (no default choice was presented). The data used in our study consist of all individuals who chose to have their data shared broadly. The access to the data was granted after registration in the Synapse system and accepting data-specific Conditions.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The m-Power dataset used for this article is available upon registration from Synapse at: https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn4993293/