Abstract
Background Acute paediatric pain management is often suboptimal in the emergency setting. There is a paucity of published literature on parental administration of analgesia to children, prior to their arrival at the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of pre-hospital analgesic administration by parents/guardians of children ≤16 years presenting to ED, with acutely painful conditions.
Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted across two ED’s in the South of Ireland with a collective annual attendance of approximately 100,000 patients. A consecutive sample of 400 parents/guardians of children aged between 6 months and 16 years, who were self-referred to ED with acutely painful conditions, were included. Data collected included patient demographics, pain score and analgesia administration. Data was analysed with SPSS software using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results 189/400(47%) children received analgesia from their parents/guardians pre-ED arrival. Factors independently associated with increased parental administration of analgesia were: pain score ≥5/10 53.4%(95%CI 48%-59%) vs ≤4/10 29%(95%CI 21%-38%), children with siblings 49.7%(95%CI 45%-56%) vs without siblings 35.3%(95%CI 24%-47%) and presenting <48 hours from onset of pain 50.1%(95%CI 45%-55%) vs presenting ≥48 hours 30.5%(95%CI 19%-42%). Of the 400 participants, 211(53%) received no analgesia before attending ED. Reasons for parents not administering analgesia included: 62/211(29.4%) did not think the child needed it, 39/211(18.5%) accident did not happen at home, 34/211(16.1%) did not want to mask the presence of the pain, 20/211(9.5%) believed the hospital should give medications, and 18/211(8.5%) afraid it would be wrong/harmful.
Conclusions Over half the children presenting to ED, with acutely painful conditions, did not receive adequate or timely pain relief pre-ED arrival, causing avoidable suffering. Parental misconceptions about acute pain management are major barrier to analgesic administration. Educational strategies are required to dispel misconceptions, which may ultimately improve the care for this population.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding. The original study this research is based on by Spedding et al (1998) also received no funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical Approval granted by: Clinical Reasearch Ethics Committee of Cork Teaching Hospital (CREC) Ethical Approval number: ECM 02/2020 PUB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All de-identified participant data that underlie the results reported in the article will be made available (text, tables, figures and appendices). Study protocol will also be made available. Data will be available beginning immediately following publication with no end date. It will be made available to anyone who wishes to access the data for any purpose. Proposals should be submitted to 116306691{at}umail.ucc.ie.
