Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Exploring patient experiences of video consultations during Covid-19 in an outpatient care setting using routine feedback data from 955 contacts

View ORCID ProfileHL Bradwell, View ORCID ProfileRL Baines, View ORCID ProfileKRJ Edwards, View ORCID ProfileSG Stevens, K Atkinson, View ORCID ProfileE Wilkinson, View ORCID ProfileRB Jones, View ORCID ProfileA Chatterjee
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248235
HL Bradwell
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for HL Bradwell
  • For correspondence: hannah.bradwell@plymouth.ac.uk
RL Baines
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for RL Baines
KRJ Edwards
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for KRJ Edwards
SG Stevens
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for SG Stevens
K Atkinson
2Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Cornwall, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Wilkinson
2Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Cornwall, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E Wilkinson
RB Jones
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for RB Jones
A Chatterjee
1Centre for Health Technology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A Chatterjee
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Video consultations (VCs) have been rapidly implemented in response to Covid-19. However, limited research has explored patient experiences of VCs in this context. This research therefore explored patient experiences of VCs during their early stages of implementation in response to Covid-19.

Design Secondary data analysis of routine patient survey responses using descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis.

Setting and participants 955 (22.6%) survey responses following a VC using Attend Anywhere in a rural, aging and outpatient care setting between June and July 2020.

Results Most (93.2%) respondents reported having ‘good’ (n=210, 22.0%), or ‘very good’ (n=680, 71.2%) experiences with VCs. Most respondents accessed their VC alone (n=806, 84.4%), except for those aged 71+ (n=23/58, 39.7%). Most participants reported feeling listened to and understood (n=904, 94.7%), felt their needs had been met (n=860, 90.1%) and were able to communicate everything they wanted (n=848, 88.8%). Satisfaction with communication was very strongly associated with satisfaction with the technical performance of the VC (p<0.001). Free text responses had three key themes: i) barriers to VC use including technological difficulties, quality of patient information and accessibility or suitability concerns; ii) potential benefits including reduced stress and anxiety, enhanced accessibility, cost and time savings; and iii) patient suggested improvements including trial calls, turning music off, facilitating photo uploads, expanding written character limit and supporting other internet browsers. Most (92.1%) participants were likely to choose a VC again in the future.

Conclusions The vast majority of respondents reported positive experiences of VCs. Identified benefits of enhanced accessibility, affordability, time, monetary and environmental savings are particularly interesting for future service delivery. Further research is needed, using rapid co-design techniques, to improve feedback methods, patient information and experience to support sustainability and to address accessibility and experience of patients excluded from this work, through lack of VC access.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Large data set of “real world” patient feedback during the early stages of video consultation use in response to Covid-19.

  • Findings from this research provide important and early insights into patient experiences of video consultations following their rapid implementation in response to Covid-19.

  • Quantitative and qualitative insight into patient experience, barriers, benefits and suggested improvements.

  • Secondary data means we are unable to identify patients providing multiple responses.

  • Feedback was collected from patients who had successfully completed a video consultation, data may therefore contain positive bias.

  • Experiences or barriers for individuals who have not been able to, or chosen not to use video consultations currently remain unknown.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

This study was not a clinical trial, but used secondary data collected by the partner NHS Trust

Funding Statement

Funding statement: This work was supported by the EPIC (eHealth Productivity and Innovation in Cornwall and the Isle of Scilly) project which was part funded by the European Regional Development Fund. Additional funding for the EPIC project was received from University of Plymouth. ERDF Grant number [05R18P02814].

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval to conduct this secondary analysis and complete further primary data collection was attained from the Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW), IRAS ID 286543.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • rebecca.baines{at}plymouth.ac.uk, katie.edwards{at}plymouth.ac.uk, sebastian.stevens{at}plymouth.ac.uk, kate.atkinson3{at}nhs.net, ellen.wilkinson{at}nhs.net, ray.jones{at}plymouth.ac.uk, arunangsu.chatterjee{at}plymouth.ac.uk

Data Availability

Data sharing statement: Not all patients have consented for their comments to be published, thus the full dataset is not available publicly, but interested parties may enquire with the authors for further details.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 17, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exploring patient experiences of video consultations during Covid-19 in an outpatient care setting using routine feedback data from 955 contacts
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Exploring patient experiences of video consultations during Covid-19 in an outpatient care setting using routine feedback data from 955 contacts
HL Bradwell, RL Baines, KRJ Edwards, SG Stevens, K Atkinson, E Wilkinson, RB Jones, A Chatterjee
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248235; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248235
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Exploring patient experiences of video consultations during Covid-19 in an outpatient care setting using routine feedback data from 955 contacts
HL Bradwell, RL Baines, KRJ Edwards, SG Stevens, K Atkinson, E Wilkinson, RB Jones, A Chatterjee
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248235; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248235

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (158)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5275)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (197)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (700)
  • Health Policy (361)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (164)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5904)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (769)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (132)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (144)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (481)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
  • Public and Global Health (2028)
  • Radiology and Imaging (350)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)