Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures - A spatial difference-in-differences approach

View ORCID ProfileReinhold Kosfeld, View ORCID ProfileTimo Mitze, View ORCID ProfileJohannes Rode, View ORCID ProfileKlaus Wälde
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248173
Reinhold Kosfeld
aInstitute of Economics, Universität Kassel, Nora-Platiel-Str. 4, 34127 Kassel, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Reinhold Kosfeld
  • For correspondence: rkosfeld@uni-kassel.de
Timo Mitze
bDepartment of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timo Mitze
Johannes Rode
cDepartment of Law and Economics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Hochschulstraße 1, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Johannes Rode
Klaus Wälde
dGutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Jakob-Welder-Weg 4, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Klaus Wälde
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since mid-March 2020 the Federal and state governments in Germany agreed on comprehensive public health measures to curb the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections leading to the Covid-19 disease. We study the containment effects of these policy interventions on the progression of the pandemic in the first containment phase in spring 2020 before the easing of restrictions may become effective by the end of April. To exploit both the temporal and spatial dimension in the dissemination of the virus, we conduct a spatial panel data analysis for German NUTS-3 regions. Specifically, we employ a spatial difference-in-differences approach to identify the effects of six compound sets of public health measures. We find that contact restrictions and closure of schools substantially contributed to flattening the infection curve. Additionally, a strong treatment effect of mandatory wearing of face masks is established for the few treated regions during this containment phase. No incremental effect is evidenced for closure of establishments, such as museums, theaters, cinemas and parks, and the shutdown of shopping malls and other non-essential retail stores. These findings prove to be robust to changes in model specification. By contrast, the dampening effect of restaurant closure is sensitive to model variation.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

no external funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

no approval or exemption necessary

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • tmitze{at}sam.sdu.dk.

  • rode{at}vwl.tu-darmstadt.de.

  • waelde{at}uni-mainz.de.

  • 6 Delgado and Florax (2015) introduce a spillover parameter ρ that implies θk = ρ·γk. This relation can be helpful for estimating the combined effect in case of multicollinearity.

Data Availability

Data is public

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 07, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures - A spatial difference-in-differences approach
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures - A spatial difference-in-differences approach
Reinhold Kosfeld, Timo Mitze, Johannes Rode, Klaus Wälde
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248173; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248173
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures - A spatial difference-in-differences approach
Reinhold Kosfeld, Timo Mitze, Johannes Rode, Klaus Wälde
medRxiv 2020.12.15.20248173; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.15.20248173

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (579)
  • Anesthesia (140)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1947)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (252)
  • Dermatology (185)
  • Emergency Medicine (333)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (700)
  • Epidemiology (11108)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (626)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3182)
  • Geriatric Medicine (309)
  • Health Economics (563)
  • Health Informatics (2043)
  • Health Policy (863)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (782)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (682)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12729)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (707)
  • Medical Education (317)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (336)
  • Neurology (2993)
  • Nursing (164)
  • Nutrition (465)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1556)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (185)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (914)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (382)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2789)
  • Public and Global Health (5597)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1095)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (635)
  • Respiratory Medicine (761)
  • Rheumatology (339)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (311)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (343)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)