Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities

View ORCID ProfileNada Abdelmagid, View ORCID ProfileSalma A.E. Ahmed, View ORCID ProfileNazik Nurelhuda, Israa Zainalabdeen, Aljaile Ahmed, View ORCID ProfileMahmoud Ali Fadlallah, Maysoon Dahab
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.14.20248160
Nada Abdelmagid
1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, (Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology), London, (London), United Kingdom
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nada Abdelmagid
  • For correspondence: nada.abdelmagid@lshtm.ac.uk
Salma A.E. Ahmed
2Independent public health researcher, Khartoum, (Khartoum), Sudan
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Salma A.E. Ahmed
Nazik Nurelhuda
3University of Khartoum, Faculty of Dentistry, Khartoum, (Khartoum), Sudan
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nazik Nurelhuda
Israa Zainalabdeen
4Y-PEER Sudan, Khartoum, (Khartoum), Sudan
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aljaile Ahmed
4Y-PEER Sudan, Khartoum, (Khartoum), Sudan
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah
5Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, (Bangkok), Thailand
6Public Health Institute (PHI), Khartoum, (Khartoum), Sudan
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah
Maysoon Dahab
1London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, (Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology), London, (London), United Kingdom
7Sudan COVID-19 Research Group
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Shielding of high-risk groups from coronavirus disease (COVID-19), either within their households or safe communal structures, has been suggested as a realistic alternative to severe movement restrictions in response to the COVID-19 epidemic in low-income countries. To our knowledge, this concept has not been tested or evaluated in resource-poor settings. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield persons at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, during the COVID-19 epidemic in six communities in Sudan.

Methods We purposively sampled participants from six communities, illustrative of urban, rural and forcibly-displaced settings. In-depth telephone interviews were held with 59 members of households with one or more members at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. Follow-up interviews were held with 30 community members after movement restrictions were eased across the country. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a two-stage deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

Results Most participants were aware that some people are at higher risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes but were unaware of the concept of shielding. Most participants found shielding acceptable and consistent with cultural inclinations to respect elders and protect the vulnerable. However, extra-household shielding arrangements were mostly seen as socially unacceptable. Participants reported feasibility concerns related to the social isolation of shielded persons and loss of income for shielding families. The acceptability and feasibility of shielding strategies were reduced after movement restrictions were eased, as participants reported lower perception of risk in their communities and increased pressure to comply with social commitments outside the house.

Conclusion Shielding is generally acceptable in the study communities. Acceptability is influenced by feasibility, and by contextual changes in the epidemic and associated policy response. The promotion of shielding should capitalise on the cultural and moral sense of duty towards elders and vulnerable groups. Communities and households should be provided with practical guidance to implement feasible shielding options. Households must be socially, psychologically and financially supported to adopt and sustain shielding effectively.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The data collection costs were borne by the investigators and volunteer youth peers. NA was supported by UK Research and Innovation as part of the Global Challenges Research Fund, grant number ES/P010873/1. Article Processing Charges were covered by UK Aid via The British Council, as part of the 'Community-led COVID-19 Mitigation in Sudan: A Research and Advocacy Intervention' project. None of the above funding bodies had any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The ethical approval for the study was obtained from Sudan's National Health Research Ethics Committee based at the Federal Ministry of Health (number 1-4-20) and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine's Research Ethics Committee (number 22051). All participants provided verbal informed consent, including explicit permission to record the interview and to publish anonymised quotes from the interview. Participation was voluntary, and participants were not financially rewarded for participation.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

  • List of abbreviations

    COREQ
    Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research
    COVID-19
    Coronavirus disease
    WHO
    World Health Organization
    Y-PEER Sudan
    Sudan’s Youth Peer Education Network
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted December 14, 2020.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities
    Nada Abdelmagid, Salma A.E. Ahmed, Nazik Nurelhuda, Israa Zainalabdeen, Aljaile Ahmed, Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah, Maysoon Dahab
    medRxiv 2020.12.14.20248160; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.14.20248160
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities
    Nada Abdelmagid, Salma A.E. Ahmed, Nazik Nurelhuda, Israa Zainalabdeen, Aljaile Ahmed, Mahmoud Ali Fadlallah, Maysoon Dahab
    medRxiv 2020.12.14.20248160; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.14.20248160

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (216)
    • Allergy and Immunology (495)
    • Anesthesia (106)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1101)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
    • Dermatology (141)
    • Emergency Medicine (274)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (502)
    • Epidemiology (9785)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (481)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2319)
    • Geriatric Medicine (223)
    • Health Economics (463)
    • Health Informatics (1563)
    • Health Policy (737)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (606)
    • Hematology (238)
    • HIV/AIDS (507)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11657)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
    • Medical Education (240)
    • Medical Ethics (67)
    • Nephrology (258)
    • Neurology (2149)
    • Nursing (134)
    • Nutrition (338)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (518)
    • Oncology (1183)
    • Ophthalmology (366)
    • Orthopedics (129)
    • Otolaryngology (220)
    • Pain Medicine (148)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (313)
    • Pediatrics (698)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (302)
    • Primary Care Research (267)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2188)
    • Public and Global Health (4675)
    • Radiology and Imaging (781)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
    • Respiratory Medicine (624)
    • Rheumatology (274)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
    • Sports Medicine (210)
    • Surgery (252)
    • Toxicology (43)
    • Transplantation (120)
    • Urology (94)