Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study

View ORCID ProfileSarah Denford, Kate S Morton, Helen Lambert, Juan Zhang, Louise E Smith, G James Rubin, Shenghan Cai, Tingting Zhang, Charlotte Robin, Gemma Lasseter, Mathew Hickman, Isabel Oliver, Lucy Yardley
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.11.20247528
Sarah Denford
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sarah Denford
  • For correspondence: sarah.denford@bristol.ac.uk
Kate S Morton
4Academic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Lambert
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Zhang
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Louise E Smith
5NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King’s College London, UK
6Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G James Rubin
5NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, King’s College London, UK
6Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shenghan Cai
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tingting Zhang
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charlotte Robin
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
7Public Health England, National Infection Service, Liverpool, UK
8NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
9NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gemma Lasseter
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mathew Hickman
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel Oliver
10Public Health England, National Infection Service, Bristol, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lucy Yardley
1Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
2School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol in collaboration with Public Health England
4Academic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In an effort to reduce the spread of COVID-19, the UK government has introduced a series of mitigation measures. The success of these measures in preventing transmission is dependent on adherence, which is currently considered to be low. Evidence highlights the disproportionate impact of mitigation measures on individuals from Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities, as well as among those on a low income, and an understanding of barriers to adherence in these populations is needed. In this qualitative study we examined patterns of adherence to mitigation measures and reasons underpinning these behaviors among people on low income and those from BAME communities.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants from BAME and low-income White backgrounds. The topic guide was designed to explore how individuals are adhering to social distancing and self-isolation measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to explore in detail the reasons underpinning this behavior. Data were analyzed using ‘thematic analysis following which charts were used to help compare concepts within and between participants and develop an understanding of patterns of adherence.

Participants were confused by the constantly changing and seemingly contradictory rules and guidance. As a result, decisions were made about how best to protect themselves and their household from COVID-19, and from the detrimental impact of lockdown restrictions. This was not always in line with government advice. We identified three categories of adherence to lockdown measures 1) caution motivated super-adherence 2) risk-adapted partial-adherence and 3) necessity-driven partial-adherence. Decisions about adherence considered potential for exposure to the virus, ability to reduce risk through use of protective measures, and perceived importance of/need for the behavior.

This research highlights a need for a more nuanced understanding of adherence to lockdown measures. Provision of practical and financial support could reduce the number of people who have to engage in necessity-driven partial-adherence. Information about viral transmission could help people assess the risk associated with partial-adherence more accurately. More evidence is required on population level risks of people adopting risk-adapted partial-adherence.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) and by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) / Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) COVID-19 Rapid Response Call 2 (grant number MC_PC 19071). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or PHE. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was provided by the NHS Health Research Authority London Queen Square Research Ethics Committee (20/HRA/2549). All interview participants verbally consented to take part in the study.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study
Sarah Denford, Kate S Morton, Helen Lambert, Juan Zhang, Louise E Smith, G James Rubin, Shenghan Cai, Tingting Zhang, Charlotte Robin, Gemma Lasseter, Mathew Hickman, Isabel Oliver, Lucy Yardley
medRxiv 2020.12.11.20247528; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.11.20247528
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Understanding patterns of adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures: A qualitative interview study
Sarah Denford, Kate S Morton, Helen Lambert, Juan Zhang, Louise E Smith, G James Rubin, Shenghan Cai, Tingting Zhang, Charlotte Robin, Gemma Lasseter, Mathew Hickman, Isabel Oliver, Lucy Yardley
medRxiv 2020.12.11.20247528; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.11.20247528

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (160)
  • Allergy and Immunology (412)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (855)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (156)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (247)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (392)
  • Epidemiology (8534)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (381)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1739)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (370)
  • Health Informatics (1234)
  • Health Policy (618)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (369)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10271)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (552)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (210)
  • Neurology (1666)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (247)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (325)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (925)
  • Ophthalmology (262)
  • Orthopedics (100)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (110)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (249)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (246)
  • Primary Care Research (205)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1757)
  • Public and Global Health (3826)
  • Radiology and Imaging (622)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (317)
  • Respiratory Medicine (518)
  • Rheumatology (207)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (164)
  • Sports Medicine (156)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (100)
  • Urology (74)