Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England

Thiemo Fetzer, Thomas Graeber
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247080
Thiemo Fetzer
†University of Warwick, CAGE, CESifo and CEPR.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t.fetzer@warwick.ac.uk t.fetzer@warwick.ac.uk
Thomas Graeber
‡Harvard Business School, CESifo and IZA.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tgraeber@hbs.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Contact tracing has been a central pillar of the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, contact tracing measures face substantive challenges in practice and well-identified evidence about their effectiveness remains scarce. This paper exploits quasi-random variation in COVID-19 contact tracing. Between September 25 and October 2, 2020, a total of 15,841 COVID-19 cases in England (around 15 to 20% of all cases) were not immediately referred to the contact tracing system due to a data processing error. Case information had been truncated from an Excel spreadsheet due to a row limit, which was discovered on October 3. There is substantial variation in the degree to which different parts of England areas were exposed – by chance – to delayed referrals of COVID-19 cases to to the contact tracing system. We show that more affected areas subsequently experienced a drastic rise in new COVID-19 infections and deaths alongside an increase in the positivity rate and the number of test performed, as well as a decline in the performance of the contact tracing system. Conservative estimates suggest that the failure of timely contact tracing due to the data glitch is associated with more than 125,000 additional infections and over 1,500 additional COVID-19-related deaths. Our findings provide strong quasi-experimental evidence for the effectiveness of contact tracing.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work did not receive any external research funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The research is unregulated.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • * We thank Arun Advani, Tim Besley, Mirko Draca, Stephen Hansen, Neil Lawrence, Chris Roth, Flavio Toxvaerd, Yee Whye Teh for helpful comments and thoughts on the draft.

Data Availability

All data and code used to produce the results presented in the paper will be made available upon publication of the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 15, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England
Thiemo Fetzer, Thomas Graeber
medRxiv 2020.12.10.20247080; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247080
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England
Thiemo Fetzer, Thomas Graeber
medRxiv 2020.12.10.20247080; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.10.20247080

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (271)
  • Allergy and Immunology (553)
  • Anesthesia (135)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1761)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (238)
  • Dermatology (173)
  • Emergency Medicine (312)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (660)
  • Epidemiology (10803)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (592)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2952)
  • Geriatric Medicine (287)
  • Health Economics (534)
  • Health Informatics (1930)
  • Health Policy (836)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (745)
  • Hematology (293)
  • HIV/AIDS (631)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12519)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (693)
  • Medical Education (299)
  • Medical Ethics (86)
  • Nephrology (324)
  • Neurology (2801)
  • Nursing (151)
  • Nutrition (433)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (559)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (597)
  • Oncology (1469)
  • Ophthalmology (444)
  • Orthopedics (172)
  • Otolaryngology (257)
  • Pain Medicine (190)
  • Palliative Medicine (56)
  • Pathology (381)
  • Pediatrics (867)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (366)
  • Primary Care Research (337)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2641)
  • Public and Global Health (5374)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1013)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (596)
  • Respiratory Medicine (726)
  • Rheumatology (330)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (289)
  • Sports Medicine (279)
  • Surgery (327)
  • Toxicology (47)
  • Transplantation (150)
  • Urology (125)