Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Development and assessment of the performance of a shared ventilatory system that uses clinically available components to individualize tidal volumes

View ORCID ProfileDavid M. Hannon, Tim Jones, Jack Conolly, Conor Judge, Talha Iqbal, Atif Shahzad, Michael Madden, Frank Kirrane, Peter Conneely, Brian H. Harte, Martin O’Halloran, John G. Laffey
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.09.20246165
David M. Hannon
1Department of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, and National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David M. Hannon
Tim Jones
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Conolly
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Conor Judge
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Talha Iqbal
3Smart Sensors Lab, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atif Shahzad
3Smart Sensors Lab, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Madden
4School of Computer Science, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Kirrane
5Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Conneely
5Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian H. Harte
1Department of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, and National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin O’Halloran
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
6CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John G. Laffey
1Department of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, and National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
2Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
6CÚRAM Centre for Research in Medical Devices, Biomedical Sciences Building, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.laffey{at}nuigalway.ie
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives To develop and assess the performance of a system for shared ventilation that uses clinically available components to individualize tidal volumes under a variety of clinically relevant conditions.

Design Evaluation and in vitro validation study.

Setting Ventilator shortage during the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic.

Participants The design and validation team consisted of intensive care physicians, bioengineers, computer programmers, and representatives from the medtech sector.

Methods Using standard clinical components, a system of shared ventilation consisting of two ventilatory limbs was assembled and connected to a single ventilator. Individual monitors for each circuit were developed using widely available equipment and open source software. System performance was determined under 2 sets of conditions. First, the effect of altering ventilator settings (Inspiratory Pressure, Respiratory rate, I:E ratio) on the tidal volumes delivered to each lung circuit was determined. Second, the impact of altering the compliance and resistance in one simulated lung circuit on the tidal volumes delivered to that lung and the second lung circuit was determined. All measurements at each setting were repeated three times to determine the variability in the system.

Results The system permitted accurate and reproducible titration of tidal volumes to each ‘lung circuit’ over a wide range of ventilator settings and simulated lung conditions. Alteration of ventilator inspiratory pressures stepwise from 4-20cm H2O, of respiratory rates from 6-20 breaths/minute and I:E ratio from 1:1 to 1:4 resulted in near identical tidal volumes delivered under each set of conditions to each simulated ‘lung’. Stepwise alteration of compliance and resistance in one ‘test’ lung circuit resulted in reproducible alterations in tidal volume to the ‘test’ lung, with little change to tidal volumes in the ‘control’ lung (a change of only 6% is noted). All tidal volumes delivered were highly reproducible upon repetition.

Conclusions We demonstrate the reliability of a simple shared ventilation system assembled using commonly available clinical components that allows individual titration of tidal volumes. This system may be useful as a temporary strategy of last resort where the numbers of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation exceeds supply of ventilators.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This solution provides the ability to safely and robustly ventilate two patients simultaneously while allowing differing tidal volumes in each limb.

  • The designed solution uses equipment readily available in most hospitals.

  • Accurate and reproducible titration of tidal volumes to each ‘lung’ was possible over a wide range of ventilator settings.

  • Alteration of one simulated ‘lung’ conditions had minimal impact on the tidal volumes delivered to the unaffected lung

  • The system relies on patients being sedated and paralysed.

  • We have not yet tested this solution in vivo, on COVID-19 patients.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Opinion of REB chair sought. No IRB or ethical review necessary as paper details a test of equipment with no experimental subjects involved.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, John G. Laffey, upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 11, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development and assessment of the performance of a shared ventilatory system that uses clinically available components to individualize tidal volumes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Development and assessment of the performance of a shared ventilatory system that uses clinically available components to individualize tidal volumes
David M. Hannon, Tim Jones, Jack Conolly, Conor Judge, Talha Iqbal, Atif Shahzad, Michael Madden, Frank Kirrane, Peter Conneely, Brian H. Harte, Martin O’Halloran, John G. Laffey
medRxiv 2020.12.09.20246165; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.09.20246165
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Development and assessment of the performance of a shared ventilatory system that uses clinically available components to individualize tidal volumes
David M. Hannon, Tim Jones, Jack Conolly, Conor Judge, Talha Iqbal, Atif Shahzad, Michael Madden, Frank Kirrane, Peter Conneely, Brian H. Harte, Martin O’Halloran, John G. Laffey
medRxiv 2020.12.09.20246165; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.09.20246165

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (431)
  • Allergy and Immunology (757)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3298)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (365)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1173)
  • Epidemiology (13385)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5158)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3276)
  • Health Policy (1143)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1193)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1019)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14637)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (525)
  • Neurology (4930)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (886)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (728)
  • Orthopedics (282)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (544)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4218)
  • Public and Global Health (7512)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1708)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1016)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (549)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)