ABSTRACT
Objectives To identify geographic hotspots and coldspots of work disability burden and associated sociodemographic factors in Australia.
Methods Using Australian workers’ compensation and census data, we calculated weeks of compensated time off work per 1,000 labour force at Statistical Area Level 4, an indicator of work disability burden. Records included all claims with at least one day of compensated time off work lodged between 2010 and 2015. Work disability burden was z-transformed by state and mapped across Australia. Statistical Areas ≥ 1.5 standard deviations from the state/territory mean were considered hotspots and coldspots. We tested several sociodemographic factors as predictors of work disability burden.
Results Work disability burden hotspots were concentrated in lower socioeconomic suburbs and exurbs of state capitals, plus several regional areas. Coldspots were primarily in wealthy central urban and suburban areas. Factors associated with greater work disability burden include socioeconomic disadvantage, rurality, lower labour force participation, higher unemployment, and more people with core activity limitations, aged 65+ years, and aged 65+ but fewer foreign-born.
Conclusions Work disability burden is unequally distributed across Australia and strongly influenced by sociodemographic factors. The findings can guide more efficient allocation of resources for primary and secondary work disability prevention and rehabilitation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors previously received salary support from funding provided by the workers compensation systems investigated in this study.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project Grant (DP190102473), as part of the Compensation and Return to Work Effectiveness (COMPARE) Project, and by Safe Work Australia, a government statutory agency that develops national work health and safety and workers compensation policy.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Monash Human Research Ethics Committee (CF14/2995 - 2014001663)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Aggregated data and code are available on a Bridges repository. While we do not provide identifiable raw case-level data, we have provided our cleaning Rmarkdown file to demonstrate the process. Where we do not own the data such as state and territory shape files, we have provided a link to the original source in the Rmarkdown file chunk.
