Abstract
Background Preclinical models propose that the onset of psychosis involves increased hippocampal activity which drives subcortical dopaminergic dysfunction. We used multi-modal neuroimaging to examine the relationship between hippocampal regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity in people at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis, and investigated its association with subsequent clinical outcomes.
Methods Ninety-five participants (67 CHR and 28 healthy controls) underwent pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and 18F-DOPA PET imaging at baseline. Clinical outcomes in CHR participants were determined after a median of 15 months follow-up, using the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental States (CAARMS) and the Global Assessment of Function (GAF) scale.
Results CHR participants with a poor functional outcome (follow-up GAF<65, n=25) showed higher rCBF in the right hippocampus compared to CHRs with a good functional outcome (GAF≥65, n=25) (familywise error [FWE] p=0·026). The relationship between right hippocampal rCBF and striatal dopamine synthesis capacity was also significantly different between groups (pFWE=0·035); the association was negative in CHR with poor outcomes (pFWE=0·012), but non-significant in CHR with good outcomes. The correlation between rCBF in this right hippocampal region and striatal dopamine function also predicted a longitudinal increase in the severity of positive psychotic symptoms (p=0·041). The relationship between hippocampal rCBF and striatal dopamine did not differ in the total CHR group relative to controls.
Interpretation These findings indicate that altered interactions between the hippocampus and the subcortical dopamine system are implicated in the pathophysiology of psychosis-related outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Grace receives consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Takeda, Dainippon Sumitomo, Otsuka, Lilly, Roche, Asubio, and Abbott; and receives research funding from Lundbeck, Lilly, Autifony, Alkermes and Johnson & Johnson. Dr Howes has received investigator initiated research funding from and/or participated in advisory/speaker meetings organized by Astra-Zeneca, Autifony, BMS, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Invicro, Jansenn, Lundbeck, Lyden-Delta, Otsuka, Servier, Sunovion, Rand and Roche. Neither Dr Howes or his family have been employed by or have holdings/a financial stake in any biomedical company. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant to PM, PA, ODH, JS & AAG (grant number 091667, 2011), and an MRC Research Grant to PM (grant number G0700995). GM is supported by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (grant number 202397/Z/16/Z).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Service UK Research Ethics Committee, and all participants provided written informed consent to participate.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
We are unable to share data because participants did not provide consent for data sharing.
