Associations between vaping and Covid-19: cross-sectional findings from the HEBECO study

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Covid-19 outbreak a global pandemic in March 2020. Covid-19 is an infectious disease that attacks the human respiratory system and can cause mild to severe illness and death (WHO, 2020). Using e-cigarettes, or vaping, is not harmless to lung function, but there has been little research on its impact on Covid-19. Tobacco smoking is more harmful to lungs than vaping (Denholm et al., 2010; Feldman & Anderson, 2013) but some research suggests that smokers may be at reduced risk of Covid-19 infection. While there remains uncertainty regarding the associated risk of Covid-19 hospitalisation, disease severity and mortality among smokers (Simons et al., 2020), some researchers have argued that the unexpected associations observed between smoking and Covid-19 outcomes may in part reflect either a protective effect of nicotine on Covid-19 initial infection, via interaction of nicotine with the ACE-2 receptor (Farsalinos et al., 2020), or on more severe disease progression after the infection, via the impact of nicotine on the anti-inflammatory cytokine pathway (Farsalinos et al., 2020; Kloc et al., 2020). In the absence of clear evidence, public health messaging has focused on the general benefits of quitting tobacco smoking (WHO, 2020; Public Health England, 2020). Some public health organisations have also urged people to stop vaping, claiming that vaping may increase susceptibility to Covid-19, despite little evidence to support this (Rizzo, 2020).

Irrespective of discussions surrounding potential protective effects of nicotine and whether there are substantial concerns about inhaling and exhaling vapour during a respiratory virus pandemic, it seems likely that the Covid-19 pandemic will have affected rates of vaping. On the one hand, an increase in attempts to stop smoking during the Covid-19 pandemic has been documented (Jackson et al, 2020), which could have increased uptake of vaping as a cessation aid. On the other hand, vape shops were shut during the UK lockdown, which might have reduced vaping. Data thus far are contradictory: some UK studies have reported reductions in vaping (Niedzwiedz et al., 2020), and increasing attempts to quit vaping due to concerns about Covid-19 (Tattan-Birch et al., 2020). Yet, another study in Italy, where vape shops were open during the lockdown, reported no change in vaping (Caponnetto et. al, 2020).

Given that e-cigarettes deliver nicotine without many of the harmful toxicants and carcinogens found in cigarette smoke (Shahab et al., 2017), investigating the association between vaping and Covid-19 infection may help delineate some of the proposed mechanisms for any potential protective or harmful effects of nicotine on Covid-19 outcomes. Further, understanding the impact of Covid-19 on vaping rates can help identify targets for intervention during future periods of social distancing and lockdown measures.

2. Methods

3. Results

A total of 2994 (weighted 2792) participants met the inclusion criteria for the study (complete cases) and were included in the present analyses. All the results presented below are weighted (for unweighted results see Supplementary Materials 2). Sample characteristics are shown in Table 1. Of the analytic sample, three quarters were never smokers and the rest were current or ex-vapers. Overall, one third of participants were aged 55-64 years, half were female, the majority were of White ethnicity, one third had no post-16 educational qualifications and three quarters had an annual income of less than £50,000.

3.1 RQ1: Diagnosed/suspected Covid-19

Of the total sample, 1% (95% CI 0.7-1.4%) reported having a diagnosis of Covid-19 and a further 21.5% (95%CI 19.9-23.0%) reported suspected Covid-19. Table 2 shows the prevalence of diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 by vaping status. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses showed no significant differences between vaping status and diagnosed/suspected Covid-19. The calculation of Bayes Factors (BFs) with expected effect sizes set to indicate a positive association (harmful effect) of ex- and current vaping compared with never vaping with diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 indicated that there was insufficient evidence to rule out small, medium (Supplementary Table 1) and large associations (Table 2). However, in adjusted analyses, there was sufficient evidence to rule out large differences in diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 for current compared with never vapers (Table 2). The calculation of BFs with expected effect sizes set to indicate a negative association (protective effect) of ex- and current vaping compared with never vaping with diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 indicated that there was sufficient evidence to rule out small, medium and large associations (Supplementary Table 2).

4. Discussion

In this sample of UK adults, current vaping was not associated with diagnosed/suspected Covid-19. There was sufficient evidence to rule out a negative (i.e. protective) association between vaping status and diagnosed/suspected Covid-19, but the evidence was insufficient to rule out a small or medium positive (i.e. harmful) association. Half of current vapers changed their vaping consumption, with most of those who changed reporting an increase in their vaping since Covid-19 and doing so out of boredom or because they were staying home where there are fewer restrictions. One-third of current vapers were motivated to quit vaping since Covid-19; however, most of them were motivated to do so for non-Covid-19-related reasons. Our results also indicate that 17.4% of recent ex-vapers had quit vaping because of Covid-19, while 40.7% of recent ex-vapers were considering taking up vaping again since Covid-19.

Similar to research conducted in a representative sample of adults in England (Tattan-Birch et al., 2020), our findings indicate that there is no difference in self-reported Covid-19 infection between never, current and ex-vapers. In contrast, research on young adults (13-24 years old) in the US suggests that vaping is associated with a diagnosis of Covid-19 (Gaiha et al., 2020). This study has linked ever but not current vaping to Covid-19, and it was conducted among teens who are more prone than adults to take other risks related to Covid-19. Our study suggests that large effects of vaping on the risk of acquiring Covid-19 can be excluded but remains agnostic as to smaller effects.

It has been theorised that there may be a potential protective effect of nicotine on Covid-19 infection as there are biologically plausible pathways through which nicotine may impact Covid-19 cell entry (Farsalinos et al., 2020; Kloc et al., 2020). Our findings do not support such a protective effect. However, the current study was not able to address whether nicotine may be protective against the development of more severe symptoms of Covid-19 among people who become infected.

Similar proportions of current vapers reported vaping more or the same since Covid-19, and only a minority reported vaping less. Reduced vaping consumption was associated with being a smoker. This finding may indicate that dual users (those who are both cigarette smokers and vapers) have decreased their vaping since Covid-19, possibly because they instead increased their cigarette smoking. This is consistent with observed increases in cigarette consumption in current smokers in England since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic (Jackson et al., 2020). Our data also suggest that some people have reduced their vaping because of staying at home where there are fewer restrictions, with more opportunities to smoke cigarettes. Being female was also associated with reductions in vaping. During the first national UK lockdown, women reported being busier than ever with an increase in home-schooling, childcare, and care for older people (Engender, 2020). As such, women had less leisure time, which may result in vaping reductions.

Of current vapers, 42% reported an increase in vaping since Covid-19. We found that younger vapers were more likely than older vapers to report vaping more. Similarly, research in other addictive behaviours has found that younger people were more likely to increase their cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption since Covid-19 (Jackson et al., 2020; Garnett et al., 2020). Research has shown that younger people have been most affected by behavioural restrictions with large declines in their mental health and well-being (Etheridge & Spantig, 2020). Younger people have also reported worries about the impact of lockdown on their studies, work and relationships (ONS, 2020) and during lockdown, loneliness levels have been the highest and life satisfaction levels the lowest among younger adults (Fancourt & Steptoe, 2020). Indeed, our data indicated that the main reasons for increase in vaping were out of boredom and because people were staying at home.

Our analyses also showed that vapers with diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 had higher odds of reporting vaping more than usual since Covid-19, which may suggest a link between vaping consumption and Covid-19 infection. However, it should be highlighted that our data were cross-sectional and we did not prospectively examine this relationship. Thus, our findings may also suggest that vapers who believe they have/had Covid-19 started vaping more because of stress or believing that nicotine is protective against Covid-19. It is also possible, especially given the small number of confirmed cases of Covid-19 in our sample, that participants may have misinterpreted their symptoms as many other respiratory infections share symptoms with Covid-19.

One third of current vapers reported being motivated to quit vaping and were partly motivated to do so because of Covid-19. However, for most of vapers, their main reason for wanting to quit vaping was unrelated to Covid-19. This is in agreement with research conducted in Italy, which suggests that vapers did not consider stopping vaping during the first Italian lockdown (Caponnetto et al., 2020). It has also been documented that among cigarette smokers, attempts to quit were triggered by non-Covid-19 related reasons (Tattan-Birch et al., 2020). It is possible that contradictory media reports on the possibility of nicotine being protective against Covid-19 have partly discouraged people to quit vaping and smoking, while influencing recent ex-vapers to consider taking up vaping again. In our sample, 40.7% of recent ex-vapers were considering taking up vaping again since Covid-19 and one of the most common self-reported reasons was because of feeling stressed.

This study has a number of strengths. Data were collected in real-time during the first phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, which reduces the risk of recall bias. The variety of measures collected is another advantage, permitting a detailed analysis of a broad range of potential confounders of the relationship between vaping and diagnosed/suspected Covid-19, and correlates of changes in vaping since Covid-19. However, the study also had several limitations. First, diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 was self-reported and not confirmed with a viral or antibody test. As many other respiratory infections share symptoms with Covid-19, some participants may have misinterpreted their symptoms. In addition, it is likely that many participants experienced asymptomatic infection (Oran & Topol, 2020) and therefore did not report being infected. Second, our measure of vaping less likely underestimated the proportion reducing their vaping as those who quit vaping altogether since Covid-19 were not included in the analyses. Third, for some analyses the sample size was small, resulting in wide confidence intervals meaning that we likely lacked sufficient power to detect differences (confirmed by BFs, indicating data insensitivity). Fourth, while we weighted the sample to be representative of the UK adult population, it was self-selected and not random which affects the generalisability of the results. Fifth, most of the questions used were adapted from previous research and not validated, while changes in vaping were self-reported. Finally, the data were cross-sectional, and we did not measure the prospective relationship between changes in vaping and potential predictor variables. Longitudinal data following changes in vaping over time as the pandemic continues would be useful in evaluating the extent to which any initial changes in vaping behaviour are maintained over time.

4.1 Conclusions

When assessed by self-report in a UK population sample, diagnosed/suspected Covid-19 was not associated with vaping status. Among current vapers, half did not change their vaping consumption since Covid-19, with about 40% reporting an increase in vaping and 10% reporting a decrease. Vaping less was associated with being female, not living with children and concurrent smoking, while vaping more was associated with being younger, living alone, and diagnosed/suspected Covid-19. Motivation to quit vaping was partly related to Covid-19. A small number of recent ex-vapers quit vaping due to Covid-19, while nearly half of recent ex-vapers were considering taking up vaping again. Unlike cigarette smoking, there appears not to be a strong signal for any protective effect of vaping on diagnosed/suspected Covid-19. In addition, Covid-19 may have contributed to reinforcing different behavioural patterns (as observed for cigarette smoking and alcohol) such that a proportion of people have stopped completely since Covid-19, with others vaping more.

Authors’ contributions

LS, AH, OP, DK and JB conceived and designed the study. DK and LS analysed the data. DK wrote the first draft. LS, AH, OP, SJ and JB provided critical revisions. All authors read and approved the submitted manuscript.

Funding

DK, AH, OP and SJ receive salary support from Cancer Research UK (C1417/A22962). Funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

JB has received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer, who manufacture smoking cessation medications. LS has received honoraria for talks, an unrestricted research grant and travel expenses to attend meetings and workshops from Pfizer and has acted as paid reviewer for grant awarding bodies and as a paid consultant for health care companies. All authors declare no financial links with tobacco companies or e-cigarette manufacturers or their representatives.

Supplementary Materials 1: Full Description of measures

Supplementary Materials 2