Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown?

Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Edgar Bustamante, Yolanda Pérez, José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241711
Paloma Vicens
1Department of Psychology, CRAMC (Research Center for Behavior Assessment), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
2Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, TECNATOX, School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis Heredia
1Department of Psychology, CRAMC (Research Center for Behavior Assessment), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
2Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, TECNATOX, School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edgar Bustamante
3Department of Geography, GRATET, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Vila-seca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yolanda Pérez
3Department of Geography, GRATET, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Vila-seca, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
José L. Domingo
2Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, TECNATOX, School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margarita Torrente
1Department of Psychology, CRAMC (Research Center for Behavior Assessment), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
2Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, TECNATOX, School of Medicine, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: margarita.torrente@urv.cat
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The petrochemical industry has made possible the economic development of many local communities, increasing the employment opportunities and generating a complex network of secondary industries closely related to those. However, it is known that petrochemical industries emit air pollutants, which are related to different negative effects on mental health. In addition, many people around the world are being exposed to highly stressful situations derived from the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown adopted by the national and regional governments. The present study was aimed at analysing the possible differential effects on different psychological outcomes (stress, anxiety, depression and emotional regulation strategies) derived from the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent lockdown in individuals living near an important petrochemical complex and subjects living in other areas, non-exposed to the characteristic environmental pollutants emitted by this kind of complexes. The sample was composed by 1607 subjects which respond a questionnaire developed ad hoc about the confinement conditions, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) and the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). The results indicated that people living closer to petrochemical complexes reported greater risk perception. However, no significant relationships between psychological variables and proximity to the focus were detected when compared people living near to or far away from a chemical/petrochemical complex. Regarding the adverse psychological effects of the first lockdown due to COVID-19 on the general population in Catalonia, we can conclude that the lockdown conditions included in this survey were mainly related to changes in the impulsivity levels of participants. However, we can also suggest that the economic effects are going to be harder than those initially detected in this study. More studies are necessary to corroborate our results.

Author Contributions Conceptualization: Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente

Funding Acquisition: José L. Domingo

Data Curation and Formal Analysis: Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Edgar Bustamante, Yolanda Pérez, Margarita Torrente

Methodology: Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Margarita Torrente

Writing-original draft: Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia

Writing- review and editing: Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Yolanda Pérez, José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Before completing the survey, information about the objectives of the study was provided and an informed consent was requested. The present study followed the ethical principles of the World Medical Associations Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Tokyo in 2004). It was approved by the Ethics Committee of Clinical Research of the Pere Virgili Health Research Institute (IISPV, Tarragona, Catalonia, Spain) (reference number: 084/2020). All data were processed in accordance with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (2016/679).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown?
Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Edgar Bustamante, Yolanda Pérez, José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente
medRxiv 2020.12.01.20241711; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241711
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Does living close to petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of COVID-19 lockdown?
Paloma Vicens, Luis Heredia, Edgar Bustamante, Yolanda Pérez, José L. Domingo, Margarita Torrente
medRxiv 2020.12.01.20241711; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.01.20241711

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (216)
  • Allergy and Immunology (496)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1110)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (275)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (505)
  • Epidemiology (9796)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (481)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2327)
  • Geriatric Medicine (223)
  • Health Economics (463)
  • Health Informatics (1567)
  • Health Policy (737)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (608)
  • Hematology (238)
  • HIV/AIDS (508)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11669)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (240)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (258)
  • Neurology (2154)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (340)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (427)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (519)
  • Oncology (1185)
  • Ophthalmology (366)
  • Orthopedics (129)
  • Otolaryngology (221)
  • Pain Medicine (148)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (314)
  • Pediatrics (699)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (303)
  • Primary Care Research (268)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2195)
  • Public and Global Health (4685)
  • Radiology and Imaging (786)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (458)
  • Respiratory Medicine (625)
  • Rheumatology (276)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (226)
  • Sports Medicine (212)
  • Surgery (252)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)