Summary
Background The effect of SARS-CoV-2 mutations and viral load on the severity of COVID-19 is not well understood. The possibility of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 has already been reported, but dual infection with SARS-CoV-2 is poorly described and is currently under discussion. We describe a study of two strains of SARS-CoV-2 detected in the same patient during the same disease presentation.
Methods Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained eight days apart from the patient in their 90s, diagnosed with lobar pneumonia (J18.1). Both tests were positive for SARS-CoV-2 with high viral load (Ct = 13). We have performed high-throughput sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 genomes from both swabs.
Findings Genomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 revealed the presence of two genetically distant strains in both swabs. Detected strains belong to different phylogenetic clades (GH and GR) and differ in the seven nucleotide positions. The relative abundance of strains was 70% (GH) and 30% (GR) in the first swab, and 3% (GH) and 97% (GR).
Interpretation Our findings suggest that the patient was infected by two genetically distinct SARS-CoV-2 strains at the same time. One of the possible explanations is that the second infection occurred in the hospital. Change of the dominant strain ratio during disease manifestation could be explained by the advantage or higher virulence of the strain belonging to the clade GR.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of a grant in the form of a subsidy for the creation and development of the "World-class Genomic Research Center for Ensuring Biological Safety and Technological Independence under the Federal Scientific and Technical Program for the Development of Genetic Technologies", agreement No. 075-15-2019-1666.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This research was approved by the local ethics committee of the Central Research Institute of Epidemiology Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing on 17.11.2020.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data referred to in the manuscript is not available online.
