Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Incidence and prognostic factors of knee extension deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Nalan Ektas, View ORCID ProfileCorey Scholes, View ORCID ProfileMeredith Harrison-Brown, Maha Jegatheesan, Ashwin Rajesh, Garry Kirwan, Christopher Bell
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.26.20239046
Nalan Ektas
1EBM Analytics, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corey Scholes
1EBM Analytics, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Corey Scholes
Meredith Harrison-Brown
1EBM Analytics, NSW, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Meredith Harrison-Brown
Maha Jegatheesan
3Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashwin Rajesh
3Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Garry Kirwan
2Physiotherapy Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Bell
3Orthopaedics Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Christopher.Bell@health.qld.gov.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background and aims Knee extension deficits complicate recovery from ACL injury and reconstruction, however the incidence of knee extension loss is not well defined. The aim of this review was to identify the incidence of loss of extension (LOE) following ACL rupture and reconstruction, explore the definitions of knee extension deficits reported and identify prognostic factors affecting LOE incidence.

Methods and analysis A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Library and PEDro for studies in publication up to September 2019, with no restrictions on publication year. References were screened and assessed for inclusion using predetermined eligibility criteria. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that quantified knee angle, loss of extension or incidence of extension deficit were included for quality assessment and data extraction. Statistical summaries were generated and meta-analyses performed in two parts to examine: (i) the probability of a datapoint being zero incidence compared to a non-zero incidence, and (ii) the relationship between the predictors and non-zero LOE incidence.

Results A sample of 8594 papers were retrieved using the search criteria, with 48 studies meeting eligibility criteria. Pooled results from 4065 participants were included for analysis, with 3965 participants who had undergone ACLR. The proportion of included studies judged at an overall low risk of bias was small (6%). The analysis revealed median LOE incidence of 15.9% (IQR 1.4 - 46.5) at a median follow up from treatment of 4.9 months (IQR 1.9 - 24). Median LOE incidence was 23 % (IQR 8.4 - 50.0) for the subset of studies reporting up to 12 months of follow up. The observed group and study were the most important predictors for whether a datapoint reported an incidence of extension deficit. Time to follow up (P < 0.001) and graft type (P = 0.02) were found to have a significant influence on non-zero LOE incidence (%).

Conclusions This review examined the definitions for the measurement and interpretation of postoperative knee extension, and established the trajectory of knee extension deficit after ACL injury and reconstruction. While factors associated with loss of extension were identified, the trajectory of knee extension deficits were difficult to infer due to discrepancies in measurement techniques and patient variation. Clinicians should expect up to 1 in 3 patients to present postoperatively with loss of extension of at least 3 degrees, which may partially resolve over time. Future work should focus on the development of a standardised framework for postoperative measurement and reporting of LOE.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Protocols

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1127-8

Funding Statement

This research did not receive a specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data is available on request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 30, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidence and prognostic factors of knee extension deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Incidence and prognostic factors of knee extension deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Nalan Ektas, Corey Scholes, Meredith Harrison-Brown, Maha Jegatheesan, Ashwin Rajesh, Garry Kirwan, Christopher Bell
medRxiv 2020.11.26.20239046; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.26.20239046
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Incidence and prognostic factors of knee extension deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Nalan Ektas, Corey Scholes, Meredith Harrison-Brown, Maha Jegatheesan, Ashwin Rajesh, Garry Kirwan, Christopher Bell
medRxiv 2020.11.26.20239046; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.26.20239046

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Orthopedics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (455)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (159)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5297)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (198)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (760)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (214)
  • Health Informatics (702)
  • Health Policy (363)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (100)
  • HIV/AIDS (165)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5938)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (367)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (772)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (135)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (146)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (481)
  • Ophthalmology (153)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (97)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (138)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
  • Public and Global Health (2035)
  • Radiology and Imaging (354)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (159)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)