Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Explainable Machine Learning models for Rapid Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A multi-center study

William P.T.M. van Doorn, Floris Helmich, Paul M.E.L. van Dam, Leo H.J. Jacobs, View ORCID ProfilePatricia M. Stassen, Otto Bekers, Steven J.R. Meex
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.25.20238386
William P.T.M. van Doorn
1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Floris Helmich
3Department of Clinical Chemistry & Hematology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul M.E.L. van Dam
4Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leo H.J. Jacobs
5Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia M. Stassen
4Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Section Acute Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
6CAPHRI School for Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patricia M. Stassen
Otto Bekers
1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven J.R. Meex
1Central Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
2CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: steven.meex{at}mumc.nl
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is important for appropriate triage. Diagnostic laboratory tests are an essential part of the work-up and risk stratification of these patients. Using machine learning, the prognostic power and clinical value of these tests can be amplified greatly. In this study, we applied machine learning to develop an accurate and explainable clinical decision support tool model that predicts the likelihood of 31-day mortality in ED patients (the RISKINDEX). This tool was developed and evaluated in four Dutch hospitals.

Methods Machine learning models included patient characteristics and available laboratory data collected within the first two hours after ED presentation, and were trained using five years of data from consecutive ED patients from the Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (Maastricht), Meander Medical Center (Amersfoort), and Zuyderland (Sittard and Heerlen). A sixth year of data was used to evaluate the models using area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration curves. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm was used to obtain explainable machine learning models.

Results The present study included 266,327 patients with 7.1 million laboratory results available. Models show high diagnostic performance with AUROCs of 0.94,0.98,0.88, and 0.90 for Maastricht, Amersfoort, Sittard and Heerlen, respectively. The SHAP algorithm was utilized to visualize patient characteristics and laboratory data patterns that underlie individual RISKINDEX predictions.

Conclusions Our clinical decision support tool has excellent diagnostic performance in predicting 31-day mortality in ED patients. Follow-up studies will assess whether implementation of these algorithm can improve clinically relevant endpoints.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by a Noyons Stipendium from the Dutch Federation of Clinical Chemistry (NVKC). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the medical ethical committees of each of the individual centers (Maastricht: #2018-0838, Amersfoort: TWO19-46, Sittard: #2018-0838, Heerlen: #2018-0838). The study follows the STROBE guidelines and was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. The raw data and analysis code for this study are available on reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 04, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Explainable Machine Learning models for Rapid Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A multi-center study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Explainable Machine Learning models for Rapid Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A multi-center study
William P.T.M. van Doorn, Floris Helmich, Paul M.E.L. van Dam, Leo H.J. Jacobs, Patricia M. Stassen, Otto Bekers, Steven J.R. Meex
medRxiv 2020.11.25.20238386; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.25.20238386
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Explainable Machine Learning models for Rapid Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department: A multi-center study
William P.T.M. van Doorn, Floris Helmich, Paul M.E.L. van Dam, Leo H.J. Jacobs, Patricia M. Stassen, Otto Bekers, Steven J.R. Meex
medRxiv 2020.11.25.20238386; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.25.20238386

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Emergency Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3296)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (280)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13381)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5155)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3271)
  • Health Policy (1142)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1192)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1018)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14632)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4928)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (726)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (551)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4216)
  • Public and Global Health (7506)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1706)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1014)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (498)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)