Abstract
Background Initiation and progression of Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL) and peripheral T cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), remains poorly understood. A subset of AITL/PTCL-NOS patients develop concomitant hematologic neoplasms (CHN), including myeloid and B-cell neoplasms, and a biomarker to predict this risk is lacking. We explore these unknown areas by exploring potential relationship among clonal hematopoiesis (CH), AITL/PTCL-NOS and CHN using a genomics approach.
Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with AITL (n=25) or PTCL-NOS (n=2) whose lymphoma and matched bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood (PB) specimens were collected and subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing. Clinicopathologic data of these cases were retrieved from the medical records. CH-associated and lymphoma-specific mutations were identified, analyzed and compared among T-cell lymphoma, CH in BM/PB, and if present, CHN.
Findings 70.4% of the AITL/PTCL-NOS patients were found to harbor CH-associated genomic alterations, characterized by loss-of-function mutations in TET2 and DNMT3A. The CH-associated alterations were shared among CH and T cell lymphoma, as well as concurrent myeloid neoplasms or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC) that occurred before or after AITL development. Mutations acquired at a later stage of AITL/PTCL-NOS development were enriched for tobacco smoking-associated missense mutations. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the presence of ≥2 CH-associated TET2 mutations with ≥ 15% allele burden was associated with significantly higher risk for CHN (hazard ratio = 10.81, CI 2.2 to 53.16, p value = 0.0022, PPV = 87.5%, NPV = 92.7%).
Interpretation We provided genetic evidence that AITL/PTCL-NOS, CH, myeloid neoplasms and even DLBCL can frequently arise from common mutated hematopoietic stem-cell clones. Our findings also support smoking exposure as a potential risk factor for AITL/PTCL-NOS development, and identify potential biomarker for CHN risk in AITL/PTCL-NOS patients.
Funding the National Cancer Institute.
Research in context
Evidence before this study
With no language and time restriction, we searched PubMed up to January 2018 using the search terms “angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma” (AITL), “peripheral t cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified”(PTCL-NOS), “clonal hematopoiesis” (CH), “mutated hematopoietic stem cell”, “concomitant hematologic neoplasm” and “biomarker”. This search aimed to identify studies that documented relationship among clonal hematopoiesis, AITL/PTCL-NOS and concomitant hematologic neoplasms, as well as those documented etiology of AITL and biomarkers for development of concomitant hematologic neoplasm. We found several published studies with sporadic cases in which the TET2 or/and DNMT3A mutations detected in AITL were also found in their BM/PB compartments or concomitant myeloid neoplasms. At the end of May this year, when our studies was in progress and approached completion, a published study showed that clonal hematopoiesis associated mutations identified in the marrow were also found in the matched primary T cell lymphomas and concomitant myeloid neoplasms that occurred after AITL development.
Added value of this study
This retrospective study, with the largest cohort of patients reported to date, showed that AITL/PTCL-NOS, clonal hematopoiesis, concurrent myeloid or B cell neoplasms, were often initiated and progressed from common mutated hematopoietic stem cells. We also demonstrated that these concurrent hematologic neoplasms could occur after or before AITL development. This study discovered smoking exposure as a potential risk factor for AITL development in healthy adults who harbor clonal hematopoiesis, and identified two or more clonal hematopoiesis-associated TET2 mutations with ≥ 15% of allele burden as a predictor for development of concurrent hematologic neoplasms in AITL patients.
Implications of all the available evidence
Our data suggests that clonal hematopoiesis may be considered as a pre-malignant state for both lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Understanding of the mechanism of clonal hematopoiesis and its progression to frank hematopoietic malignancy will help development of effective intervention strategy. Public health measures like cessation of smoking might potentially reduce risk of developing AITL in healthy adults. Regularly surveilling TET2 mutation status in peripheral blood in AITL/PTCL-NOS patients might potentially assist to predict risk of second hematologic neoplasm, consequently optimizing clinical management to improve clinical outcome.
Introduction
Peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a heterogenous group of lymphoid tumors and encompass PTCL-NOS, angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL) and several other entities of T-cell lymphoma 1, likely driven by an array of recurrent genomic defects2. Except for PTCL-NOS, AITL is the most common subtype of PTCL (18.5% of mature T cell lymphoma) and is believed to arise from a subset of peripheral mature CD4+ T cells corresponding to follicular helper T (TFH) cells, characterized immunophenotypically by expression of a set of cellular markers like PD1, CXCR5, BCL-6, CD10, CXCL13 and ICOS-1 3-7. Morphologically, AITL is typically characterized by a polymorphous lymphoid infiltrate with a proliferation of medium-sized tumor cells with clear cytoplasm (clear cell immunoblasts), associated with prominent proliferation of high endothelial venules and follicular dendritic cells. A subset of PTCL, termed as PTCL with TFH phenotype in the updated WHO classification, may be biologically related to AITL, sharing some clinic-pathologic features with AITL and is thought to be also derived from TFH 8. Although progress has been made in understanding AITL pathogenesis and developing new treatment9, AITL remains as an aggressive lymphoid tumor, with low estimated rates of overall and failure-free survival at five years (33% and 18%, respectively) 10. To develop more effective therapeutic agents against AITL and PTCL in general, with TFH phenotype further understanding of the molecular pathogenic mechanisms of AITL is needed.
Genetically, AITL is characterized by a number of genomic mutations in TET2, RHOA, DNMT3A and IDH2 2,11-14. Cell-intrinsic and/or extrinsic factors that facilitate the accumulation of these AITL-related mutations remain unclear. Mutations in TET2 and DNMT3A are also frequently associated with myeloid malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). TET2 and DNMT3A are also the most commonly mutated genes associated with clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in healthy adults, especially those over 60 years of age. CH has been shown to be an aging-related process characterized by the clonal expansion of hematopoietic cells harboring one or more somatic mutations, as a result of selective advantage in the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells due to enhanced self-renewal and inhibition of differentiation15-18. It has been noted that myeloid and lymphoid malignancies may co-occur in the same patients 19. Considering the similarities in genomic mutation profiles of AITL, myeloid malignancies and CH, it has been postulated that there may be a biological link between these entities. To test this, the current study implemented next generation sequencing (NGS) approach to analyze neoplastic T cells and paired bone marrow/peripheral blood specimens from a cohort of 27 patients with AITL or PTCL-NOS, and explored the potential of using the genomic findings from this study to shed light into the etiology of AITL development and to predict clinical progression related to development of second hematologic neoplasms, which is one of the clinical challenges in the clinical management of these cancer patients.
Results
Mutation profiling of AITL/PTCL-NOS and matched BM/PB supports an origin of AITL/PTCL-NOS from mutated HSCs associated with clonal hematopoiesis
For mutation profiling, we sequenced 27 pairs of AITL or PTCL-NOS samples using a 538-gene targeted NGS panel that covered recurrently mutated genes associated with T-cell lymphomas20. Of the genomic regions targeted by the panel, 90% had a coverage depth of >1,000. Those sequenced samples included 27 diagnostic lymph node (LN) specimens from patients with AITL (n = 25) or PTCL-NOS (n = 2) and their corresponding bone marrow (BM, n=23) or peripheral blood samples (PB, n =4) from our archived specimens (hereafter denoted as AITL/PTCL-NOS). The overall genomic and pathologic findings showed that of the 27 BM/PB samples, 10 had no detectable involvement by AITL or PTCL-NOS (37%), while 17 were involved by the neoplastic T cells (63%) of variable abundance. One BM sample showed concomitant diagnostic involvement by a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (Patient #20) (Suppl. Table 1 and Suppl. Fig. 1C).
The genomic alterations found in the matched BM/PB can be due to (i) BM/PB involvement by AITL/PTCL-NOS; (ii) CH; or both (i) and (ii). To accurately characterize the mutation spectrum in the BM/PB, we distinguished the CH-associated mutations from those attributed to the BM/PB involvement by the T neoplastic cells according to the following algorithm. The tumor burden (TB) was estimated for each of the BM/PB specimens involved by the lymphomas (16 AITL and 1 PTCL-NOS) based on their histologic, immunophenotyping and T-cell receptor gamma (TCRG) gene rearrangement findings (Suppl. Fig. 1C, Suppl. Table 1), and compared to the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of the somatic alterations of T-cell lymphoma-associated genes, for example RHOA p. G17V, a molecular characteristic of AITL 11,12,14,21. The AITL/PTCL-NOS-related variants present in the BM/PBs are highlighted with rectangles on the heat map (Suppl. Fig. 1C) or marked in yellow in the Suppl. Table 3, and their VAFs (VAFinv) were found to be 1.06% on average (median, 0.565%; range: 0.1 - 5.64%) (Suppl. Fig. 1D). The variants whose VAFs could not be attributed to AITL/PTCL-NOS involvement alone in the BM/PB, or the variants detected in BM/PB uninvolved by lymphoma were presumed to correspond to variants related to CH, which was confirmed by the presence of these CH-associated mutations in purified neutrophils in the peripheral blood of one patient (#24, Suppl. Fig.4). Compared to the AITL/PTCL-NOS-related variants, the VAFs of the CH-associated variants (VAFCH) were significantly higher (p<0.0001), ranging from 0.24% to 51.5% with a mean of 22.5% (median: 16.5%), approximately 21.2 times higher than the VAFinv on average (Suppl. Fig. 1D).
We identified in the matched BM/PB specimens 44 variants from 14 genes, excluding the variants attributed to the BM/PB involvement by AITL/PTCL-NOS as described above (Suppl. Fig. 1). These alterations included 17 missense (38.64%) and 12 nonsense (27.27%) SNVs, 6 frameshift (13.64%) deletions, 7 frameshift (15.91%) and 1 in-frame insertions (Fig. 1B, Suppl. Fig. 3, Suppl. Table 2 and 3). Among these 44 somatic mutations, 37 mutations, identified in 19 of the 27 (70.4%) cases, were shared with those found in the primary lymphoma, and seven were BM/PB specific (Fig. 1B, 1C, 1E). The recurrent shared mutations were primarily restricted to TET2 (74% of the cases) and DNMT3A (37% of the cases), consistent with the top CH-associated genes previously reported (Fig. 1B, 1C) 22. All but two (Pt #5, #20) of the cases with CH-associated mutations in the BM/PB did not have a dx of an overt myeloid neoplasm. These CH-associated mutations presumably were acquired very early in the common ancestral hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from which both the myeloid and T-cell lineages are derived. Consequently, we defined these shared CH-associated variants as early mutations as seen below. In 8 patients (Patient #7, #9, #11, #12, #17, #21, #23, #26) (29.6%), no CH-associated mutations were detected in the BM or PB.
In the 27 diagnostic LN samples, we identified a total of 102 non-synonymous somatic mutations in 37 genes with a median of ∼3 variants per sample, including 62 missense (60.78%) and 20 nonsense (19.61%) single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), 1 in-frame (0.98%) and 9 frameshift (8.8%) deletions, 1 in-frame and 7 frameshift (6.9%) insertions (Fig. 1B, Suppl. Table 2, Suppl. Fig. 2). Of these 102 mutations, 37 were associated and shared with CH (Fig. 1B, 1C, 1E). In more than half of the T lymphoma cases, not only could we detect early CH-associated mutations, we also identified 65 mutations that are likely acquired during the later stage of AITL/PTCL-NOS development (referred as late mutations hereinafter) (Fig.1B, 1C). The recurrent late mutations were limited to several oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, including the well-known driver genes like RHOA (67% of the cases), TET2 (48%), IDH2 (33%), PLCG1(10%), TP53(10%), VAV1 (10%), and are characterized both by the absence of DNMT3A mutations (Fig. 1C, 1D) and by the enrichment of missense mutations, which were increased from 36.1% in the CH-associated mutations to 75.2% in the late mutations (proportion test, P value < 0.0001) (Fig. 1C and 1E). The mutations in IDH2, PLCG1, TP53, were found exclusively as late mutations and not CH-associated mutations (Fig. 1C, 1D).
Fig.1A shows 4 representative AITL cases and 2 PTCL-NOS cases with their matched BM/PB, where red dots indicate the CH-associated variants present in both the primary lymphoma and BM/PB, and black dots represent the variants associated with AITL/PTCL-NOS (also highlighted with rectangles). Detailed description of these illustrative cases is provided in the supplemental text. There are a couple of notable findings: first, more than one CH clone can be present in the BM, and their clonal representations in the BM may not reflect those in the lymphoma, as seen in the DNMT3A-mutated clones in patient #4. These results suggest that the same DNMT3A mutation can have differential effect depending on the cell lineage affected. Second, findings in patient #29 raise the possibility that besides the neoplastic T cells, reactive lymphocytes in these two cases might also harbor the CH-associated mutations.
Our results support a tumor model in which AITL/PTCL, NOS emerges from mutated and expanded HSC clones that are associated with CH in the BM as well as serving as the lymphoma precursors. The latter often acquires additional missense mutations during the course of development to frank lymphomas.
Late mutations in AITL/PTCL, NOS are enriched for C>A transversion substitutions possibly associated with smoking
We investigated whether there might be an etiologic difference between the CH-related mutations and the late mutations by analyzing the type of substitutions for these mutations.
For the CH-associated mutations, overall transition (Ti) and transverse (Tv) substitution rates are comparable (Ti vs Tv, median, 50% vs 50%, mean, 54.76% vs 45.24%, P value >0.05) (Fig. 2A). At the base substitution level, C>T is found most frequently (44%), followed by C>G (20%) (Fig. 2A), which is consistent with the reported aging and/or overactivity of APOBEC family members-associated mutational process through replicative mutagenesis 23. In the late mutations, Ti and Tv are also not significantly different (Ti vs Tv, median, 38.53 % vs 61.43 %, mean, 49.31% vs 50.68%, P value >0.05), At the base substitution level, however, besides C>T (35%), C>A emerges as one of the predominant mutant forms (36.7%), which is believed to be associated with the smoking-induced mutational process (Fig. 2B) 23. On a case basis, C>A substitutions are enriched in late mutations compared to CH mutations (mean, 38.8% vs 5.95%; median, 33.3% vs 0%; t test, P value = 0.0024) (Fig. 2C), and the fraction of the cases with C>A substitution in the late mutations is 4-5 times that with C>A in the CH associated mutations (67% vs 16%), suggesting a potential role of the smoking-associated C>A mutational process for acquisition of additional driver mutations in the pathogenesis of AITL.
Enrichment of smoking-associated C>A substitution in the late mutations raises the possibility that patients with AITL/PTCL-NOS might have a higher risk for lung cancer or other smoking associated cancers. To test this hypothesis, we compared the prevalence of lung cancer in three populations, including patients with AITL/PTCL-NOS (the current study cohort, n=28, including one additional PTCL-NOS case without matched PB/BM matched control, Patient #27, see Suppl. Table 1), patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, n= 1329) and aging-matched general US population (n= 153798075, estimated, age, 40 to 80+ years old) as control group. The data for CLL group was published 24, and the data for the control group was downloaded from the CDC website (https://gis.cdc.gov/Cancer/USCS/DataViz.html). Analysis shows that the prevalence of lung cancer in AITL/PTCL-NOS is 27.8 times higher than that in the aged-matched general population (10.71% vs 0.37%, P<0.00001), and 5.47 times higher than that in the CLL group (10.71% vs 1.96%, P<0.00001) (Fig. 2D), supporting the association between AITL/PTCL-NOS and smoking-induced tumorigenesis.
AITL with hematologic neoplasms of other lineages arise from common mutated hematopoietic stem cell precursors
Three patients with AITL presented with additional hematologic neoplasms of other lineages. We present here the clonal evolution patterns of these tumors based on the results of the mutation profiling (Fig. 3). One of these cases provides genetic evidence for the progression of CH to overt myeloid malignancy through acquisition of additional mutations (patient #5, Fig. 3A). Patient #20 illustrates that the AITL does not necessarily have to be the initially diagnosed malignancy in patients with both AITL and a second malignancy. The third case was an unusual case in which the patient (#14) had CH, AITL as well as DLBCL, the latter was associated with acquisition of an EZH2 hotspot mutation. Detailed descriptions of these illustrative cases are provided in the supplementary text.
Together, our data further provide evidence that AITL can be associated with the development of a hematopoietic neoplasm of different lineages, i.e. myeloid or B-lymphoid, either preceding or subsequent to the diagnosis of AITL. In all cases, truncal mutations common to all lineages are seen, with late mutations seen in specific tumors (e.g. SRSF2 in myeloid, EZH2 in DLBCL).
Impact of destructive TET2 mutations on development of multiple hematologic malignancies
One of the features shared among the 3 cases with concomitant hematologic neoplasms is that they all had multiple (>1) pathogenic mutations in TET2. This observation prompted us to investigate the relationship between TET2 mutation status and occurrence of multiple hematologic malignancies, specifically through assessing effects of TET2 mutation status on concomitant hematologic malignancy-free survival in AITL patients. To increase the power of the statistical analysis, the patients included in our study were combined with an outside cohort of AITL patients whose relevant genomic and survival data were recently published 25, leading to the total number of 49 cases for survival analysis.
The patients were initially divided into two groups: wild type TET2 group (no TET2 mutation found in the BM/PB samples) and pathogenic TET2 mutant groups (one or more TET2 mutation detected in the BM/PB samples). Although there was a trend that AITL patients with the pathogenic TET2 mutations detected in the BM/PB had a worse clinical outcome, no statistically significant differences in the second hematologic malignancy-free survival were observed (P value = 0.3273, stratified hazard ratio = 0.29), consistent with the literature 26.
We further stratified the patients into the high TET2 mutation burden and no or low TET2 mutation burden subgroups. The criteria for inclusion in the first subgroup (n =8) are as follows: (1) the CH identified in the BM/PB harbored two or more pathogenic mutations in TET2, including pathogenic SNVs, nonsense and frameshift mutations interpreted as “Tier 1” or “Tier 2” mutations according to a published professional guideline in molecular pathology 27; (2) The VAF of each of the pathogenic TET2 variants described in (1) was ≥ 15%. The cases that did not meet these two criteria were assigned to the second subgroup (n=41). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that AITL patients carrying two or more pathogenic TET2 mutations with high allelic burden (the first subgroup) had significantly shorter second hematologic malignancy-free survival (P value = 0.0034) (Fig. 4). Cox proportional hazards model also estimated a significantly higher hazard ratio (HR) in the first subgroup (stratified hazard ratio, 10.81, 95% CI of ratio, 2.2 to 53.2). Further analysis shows that specificity and sensitivity of this CHN biomarker reach 97.44%, 70%, respectively, with 87.5% of positive predictive value (PPV) and 92.7% of negative predictive value (NPV). This survival analysis indicates that harboring two or more pathologic mutations in TET2 with relatively high allele burden (≥15%) is an independent risk factor to predict the second hematologic malignancies in AITL patients.
Discussion
In the current study, we examined the landscape of the genomic alterations in AITL/PTLC-NOS and their paired BM or PB using a large-panel targeted sequencing approach in the largest cohort of the AITL patients reported to date. We demonstrated that in about 60% of AITL/PTLC-NOS patients, identical pathogenic TET2 and/or DNMT3A mutations were shared between AITL/PTCL-NOS and CH found in the BM or PB. Studies of large cohorts have demonstrated an increased risk of hematologic malignancy for CH 22,28, but no definitive link has been established between CH and AITL/PTCL-NOS from those studies. Our findings suggest that these TET2 and/or DNMT3A mutations occur very early in the HSC before they give rise to the common lymphoid progenitors and common myeloid progenitors, and propose a possible link between CH and development of AITL2. Interestingly, the VAF of the CH-associated mutations is 22.5% on average in our cohort, and is higher compared to the average VAF of CH-related mutations in the general population 22. This observation is in line with the higher risk of hematopoietic malignancy associated with increased VAF (>10%)29. It is conceivable that certain TET2 or DNMT3A mutations are stronger drivers which can result in more expanded CH and/or higher efficient T-cell lymphoma development. For example, as seen in patient #28, there were 3 TET2 mutations identified in the LN, each of which appears to be present in separate clones and have different capacity to generate CH based on VAF in the BM (0%, 5.47% and 10.89%, respectively). In addition, our study supports a mutated HSC origin for AITL. As the TET2 and/or DNMT3A mutations are propagated to the lymphoid and myeloid progeny of the mutated HSC, it can be speculated that in the lymphoid compartment, the impacts of these mutations vary depending on the developmental and differentiation stage of the T-cells, and may be most felt in the T-cells of follicular helper cell origin (TFH). Lastly, our interesting case of an AITL patient with CH and subsequent development of DLBCL and the sharing of the same TET2 mutation among all three lesions suggest that a subset of DLBCL, possibly the molecular subtype characterized by mutated TET2 30 may originate from mutated HSC. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case in which the mutated HSC developed into three distinct tumors of diverse lineages.
The findings from this investigation confirm and extend the results previously published regarding the cellular origin of AITL 12,21,25,31-34. Most of these previous studies presented sporadic AITL cases in which the TET2 or/and DNMT3A mutations present in AITL were also found in their BM/PB compartments. Two reports showed that AITL shared the same TET2 mutations with the isolated CD20+/CD19+ (B cells) or CD34+ cells 31,33. These studies also pointed to a mutated HSC that gives rise to lymphoid and myeloid cells harboring the same mutations. A high-risk CH was also documented as the cellular origin of AITL and NPM1-mutated AML in a patient 21. While our manuscript was under preparation, the results of a study conceptually similar to ours regarding the cellular origin of AITL was reported 25. Consistent with our observations, the report showed that the mutations related to CH (i.e. TET2 or DNMT3A) were detected in both the neoplastic T-cell and myeloid compartments in 15 out of 22 AITL patients (68%), and associated with second myeloid neoplasm development after the diagnosis of AITL in 4 cases. However, in their cohort, no cases were reported where AITL developed subsequent to myeloid neoplasms. Our study presented one such case (Patient #20) whose AITL developed after 10 years of PV and the two hematologic neoplasms shared three identical JAK2 and TET2 mutations (Fig. 3B). The identification of cases in which myeloid neoplasms precede the diagnosis of AITL provides additional supportive evidence to the postulation that the mutated HSCs are the common origin for these hematologic neoplasms, which develop independently and divergently in tumor evolution. Whether ATIL precedes or develops subsequent to the myeloid neoplasms may depend on the stochastic dynamics of the clonal evolution.
Additional late non-CH mutations are found in 68.4% of the AITL/PTCL-NOS in our cohort, consistent with the belief that CH-associated TET2 and DNMT3A mutations are insufficient for tumorigenesis and additional genetic alterations are required. Consistent with this notion, in AITL animal models, TET2 disruption or RHOAG17V expression alone failed to induce AITL development; however, AITL-like lymphoma developed once TET2 disruption and RHOAG17V expression were combined35-37. For the development of myeloid neoplasms, additional mutations beyond CH-associated TET2 and DNMT3A mutations drive further clonal expansion from CH. These mutations may be acquired early (patient #20, JAK2, Fig, 3B) or late during tumor development (patient # 24, JAK2, Suppl. Fig. 4).
We discovered that the late non-CH mutations are enriched for the missense mutations and the C>A substitutions (Fig. 1E, Fig. 2). In the current cohort, the C>A base substitution is associated with critical mutations in a number of oncogenic genes. This finding may have implications on treatment and prevention of AITL. It is believed that the C>A mutation is likely caused by mis-replication or mis-repairing of DNA damage induced by tobacco carcinogens 23,38, which largely result in missense mutations39. Consistent with this causative link is our findings that the majority of the late non-CH mutations identified in our cohort were missense mutation (75.2%, Fig.1E), and that the patients with AITL/PTCL-NOS have a 27.8-fold increased risk for development of lung cancer compared to the age-matched general population (Fig. 2D). Consequently, our findings suggests that cessation of smoking may be a potential effective intervention to prevent AILT development in higher risk population, particularly those already found to harbor CH.
On the contrary, the CH-associated genetic alterations in the current cohort are characterized primarily by the C>T and C>G mutations (64% of all the mutations) in TET2 and DNMT3A (Fig.2A, 2C). This pattern was reported to be associated with the AID/APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases or aging-dependent function decline of base-excision repair machinery 23. This mutational mechanism might also play a role in the non-CH late mutations, as 35% of the non-CH mutations were C>T substitutions (Fig. 2B, 2C). Interestingly, reduced accumulation of the C to T mutations by inactivation of AID blocked development of B cell malignancies in aging TET2 deficient mice40, implying that AID might be a therapeutic targeting candidate for lymphoma, including AITL.
Furthermore, we found that CH associated with multiple-hit TET2 (defined as ≥2 pathogenic TET2 mutations with VAFs of ≥ 15%) is an independent risk factor for development of concurrent hematologic malignancies (Fig. 4). Recently, certain features of CH predictive of hematopoietic malignancy development were identified29. These features include >1 mutated gene, VAF> 10% and mutations in specific genes and variants, for example TP53 and IDH1/2Our TET2 biomarker includes 2 or more mutations and VAF of at least 15%. However, TET2 has not been previously implicated as a marker for increased risk of hematologic malignancy in CH in general. It is possible that this multiple-hit TET2 biomarker is specific and only relevant in the setting of patients with AITL and CH. Mechanistically, it is possible that two or more TET2 mutations each with relatively high mutation burden (>15%) correlates with increased clonal expansion and/or more severe disruption of TET2 activity, thereby increasing the global chance of acquiring additional driver mutations and hence increased risk for development of second hematologic neoplasms. Consistent with this hypothesis, aging TET2 deficient mice develop diverse hematologic malignancies 41. A reliable predictor for concurrent hematologic malignancies may be helpful for clinical stratification and management for this subset of the AITL patients. For myeloid malignancies with the double-hit TET2 mutations, more intensive therapeutic regimen like bone marrow transplantation might be warranted for reducing the risk of AITL development.
In summary, our study provides genomic evidence of an origin of AITL/PTCL-NOS from a mutated HSC clone, which can be associated with CH as well as development of myeloid and even B-cell malignancies. The development of these hematopoietic malignancies of different lineages occur via divergent evolution from the mutated HSC clone, often with acquisition of additional mutations frequently induced by mutagenic agents like tobacco. We also identified a potential biomarker: two or more pathogenic TET2 mutations with high mutation burden for the development of second hematologic neoplasm in AITL patients. Single cell methodology will help definitively determine the clonal architecture in lymphoma and BM with multiple mutations and enhance our understanding of the initiation of tumor induced by CH-associated mutations.
Methods
The detailed methods were described in the supplemental text.
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are provided or available upon request.
Contributors
SC contributed to the study design and conceptualization of the project, optimized bioinformatics pipeline, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. WZ performed the experiment and contributed to the data analysis. GI provided critical study materials and contributed to the revision of the manuscript. WT conceptualized and directed the project, designed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved it before submission.
Declaration of interests
This study is supported by a grant (R01 CA194547) from the National Cancer Institute to WT. All the authors declare no conflicts of interest.