Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project)

View ORCID ProfileSophie Juul, Emil Eik Nielsen, Joshua Feinberg, Faiza Siddiqui, Caroline Kamp Jørgensen, Emily Barot, Johan Holgersson, Niklas Nielsen, Peter Bentzer, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Lehana Thabane, Fanlong Bu, Sarah Klingenberg, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.22.20236448
Sophie Juul
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sophie Juul
  • For correspondence: sophie.juul{at}ctu.dk
Emil Eik Nielsen
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
2Department of Internal Medicine – Cardiology Section, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua Feinberg
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faiza Siddiqui
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline Kamp Jørgensen
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Barot
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Holgersson
3Lund University, Helsingborg Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niklas Nielsen
3Lund University, Helsingborg Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Bentzer
3Lund University, Helsingborg Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia & Intensive Care, Lund, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Areti Angeliki Veroniki
4Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
5Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lehana Thabane
6Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fanlong Bu
7Centre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Klingenberg
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Gluud
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janus Christian Jakobsen
1Copenhagen Trial Unit – Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
8Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background COVID-19 is a rapidly spreading disease that has caused extensive burden to individuals, families, countries, and the world. Effective treatments of COVID-19 are urgently needed. This is the second edition of a living systematic review of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of all treatment interventions for participants in all age groups with COVID-19.

Methods and findings We planned to conduct aggregate data meta-analyses, trial sequential analyses, network meta-analysis, and individual patient data meta-analyses. Our systematic review was based on PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines, and our eight-step procedure for better validation of clinical significance of meta-analysis results. We performed both fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analyses. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were admission to intensive care, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, quality of life, and non-serious adverse events. According to the number of outcome comparisons, we adjusted our threshold for significance to p = 0.033. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. We searched relevant databases and websites for published and unpublished trials until November 2, 2020. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial methodology.

We included 82 randomized clinical trials enrolling a total of 40,249 participants. 81 out of 82 trials were at overall high risk of bias.

Meta-analyses showed no evidence of a difference between corticosteroids versus control on all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 23.1%; eight trials; very low certainty), on serious adverse events (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.99; p = 0.04; I2 = 39.1%; eight trials; very low certainty), and on mechanical ventilation (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.33; p = 0.49; I2 = 55.3%; two trials; very low certainty). The fixed-effect meta-analyses showed indications of beneficial effects. Trial sequential analyses showed that the required information size for all three analyses was not reached.

Meta-analysis (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07; p = 0.31; I2 = 0%; four trials; moderate certainty) and trial sequential analysis (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that remdesivir versus control reduced the risk of death by 20%. Meta-analysis (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.00; p = 0.05; I2 = 38.9%; four trials; very low certainty) and trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed no evidence of difference between remdesivir versus control on serious adverse events. Fixed-effect meta-analysis showed indications of a beneficial effect of remdesivir on serious adverse events.

Meta-analysis (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.87; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; two trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin versus control on all-cause mortality, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects.

Meta-analysis (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.35 to 1.14; p = 0.12; I2 = 77.4%; five trials; very low certainty) and trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed no evidence of a difference between tocilizumab versus control on serious adverse events. Fixed-effect meta-analysis showed indications of a beneficial effect of tocilizumab on serious adverse events. Meta-analysis (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; three trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of tocilizumab versus control on mechanical ventilation, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm of reject realistic intervention effects.

Meta-analysis (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.69; p < 0.00; I2 = 0%; two trials; very low certainty) showed evidence of a beneficial effect of bromhexidine versus standard care on non-serious adverse events, but trial sequential analysis (required information size not reached) showed that the result was severely underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects.

Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that hydroxychloroquine versus control reduced the risk of death and serious adverse events by 20%.

Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (boundary for futility crossed) showed that we could reject that lopinavir-ritonavir versus control reduced the risk of death, serious adverse events, and mechanical ventilation by 20%.

All remaining outcome comparisons showed that we did not have enough information to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Nine single trials showed statistically significant results on our outcomes, but were underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects. Due to lack of data, it was not relevant to perform network meta-analysis or possible to perform individual patient data meta-analyses.

Conclusions No evidence-based treatment for COVID-19 currently exists. Very low certainty evidence indicates that corticosteroids might reduce the risk of death, serious adverse events, and mechanical ventilation; that remdesivir might reduce the risk of serious adverse events; that intraveneous immunoglobin might reduce the risk of death and serious adverse events; that tocilizumab might reduce the risk of serious adverse events and mechanical ventilation; and that bromhexidine might reduce the risk of non-serious adverse events. More trials with low risks of bias and random errors are urgently needed. This review will continuously inform best practice in treatment and clinical research of COVID-19.

Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020178787

Author summary Why was this study done?

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has spread rapidly worldwide, causing an international outbreak of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

  • There is a need for a living systematic review evaluating the beneficial and harmful effects of all possible interventions for treatment of COVID-19.

What did the researchers do and find?

  • We conducted the second edition of our living systematic review with meta-analyses and Trial sequential analyses to compare the effects of all treatment interventions for COVID-19.

  • Very low certainty evidence indicated that corticosteroids might reduce the risk of death, serious adverse events, and mechanical ventilation; that remdesivir might reduce the risk of serious adverse events; that intraveneous immunoglobin might reduce the risk of death and serious adverse events; that tocilizumab might reduce the risk of serious adverse events and mechanical ventilation; and that bromhexidine might reduce the risk of non-serious adverse events.

  • Nine single trials showed statistically significant results on our predefined outcomes but were underpowered to confirm or reject realistic intervention effects.

  • None of the remaining trials showed evidence of a difference of the experimental interventions on our predefined outcomes.

What do these findings mean?

  • No evidence-based treatment for COVID-19 currently exists

  • More high quality, low risk of bias randomized clinical trials are urgently needed.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

SJ, JCJ, and CG received a grant from The Grundfos Foundation (Grant number: 2020-025, URL: https://www.pdjf.dk/en/). NN received a grant from The Swedish Research Council (Grant number: N/A. URL: https://www.vr.se/english.html). AAV received a European Union's Horizon 2020 grant (Grant number: 754936. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Contact information: Emil Eik Nielsen: emil.eik.nielsen{at}gmail.com Joshua Feinberg: wtv945{at}alumni.ku.dk Faiza Siddiqui: faiza.siddiqui{at}ctu.dk Caroline Kamp Jørgensen: caroline.kamp.joergensen{at}regionh.dk Emily Barot: emily.barot{at}ctu.dk Johan Holgersson: johan.holgersson.665{at}student.lu.se Niklas Nielsen: niklas.nielsen{at}med.lu.se Peter Bentzer: peter.bentzer{at}med.lu.se Areti Angeliki Veroniki: averoniki{at}uoi.gr Lehana Thabane: thabanl{at}mcmaster.ca Fanlong Bu: bufanlong{at}bucm.edu.cn Sarah Klingenberg: sarah.klingenberg{at}ctu.dk Christian Gluud: christian.gluud{at}ctu.dk Janus Christian Jakobsen: janus.jakobsen{at}ctu.dk

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the secretary at Copenhagen Trial Unit, Mette Hansen: mette.hansen{at}ctu.dk. She is not an author of this paper. If we receive individual patient data from a third party, there may apply some restrictions.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 24, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project)
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project)
Sophie Juul, Emil Eik Nielsen, Joshua Feinberg, Faiza Siddiqui, Caroline Kamp Jørgensen, Emily Barot, Johan Holgersson, Niklas Nielsen, Peter Bentzer, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Lehana Thabane, Fanlong Bu, Sarah Klingenberg, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen
medRxiv 2020.11.22.20236448; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.22.20236448
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Interventions for treatment of COVID-19: second edition of a living systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (The LIVING Project)
Sophie Juul, Emil Eik Nielsen, Joshua Feinberg, Faiza Siddiqui, Caroline Kamp Jørgensen, Emily Barot, Johan Holgersson, Niklas Nielsen, Peter Bentzer, Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Lehana Thabane, Fanlong Bu, Sarah Klingenberg, Christian Gluud, Janus Christian Jakobsen
medRxiv 2020.11.22.20236448; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.22.20236448

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (434)
  • Allergy and Immunology (760)
  • Anesthesia (222)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3316)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (366)
  • Dermatology (282)
  • Emergency Medicine (480)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1175)
  • Epidemiology (13402)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (900)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5181)
  • Geriatric Medicine (483)
  • Health Economics (786)
  • Health Informatics (3286)
  • Health Policy (1146)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1199)
  • Hematology (432)
  • HIV/AIDS (1024)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14657)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (917)
  • Medical Education (478)
  • Medical Ethics (128)
  • Nephrology (526)
  • Neurology (4957)
  • Nursing (263)
  • Nutrition (735)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (889)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (797)
  • Oncology (2531)
  • Ophthalmology (730)
  • Orthopedics (284)
  • Otolaryngology (348)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (547)
  • Pediatrics (1308)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (552)
  • Primary Care Research (559)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4224)
  • Public and Global Health (7526)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1716)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1022)
  • Respiratory Medicine (982)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (500)
  • Sports Medicine (425)
  • Surgery (551)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (237)
  • Urology (206)