Abstract
Background The outbreak of COVID-19 led to a large number of hospitalizations in the Netherlands and worldwide. As a result, the work of hospital-based allied health professionals changed rapidly. In such a healthcare crisis, professionals may not be able to fulfill their own professional values about good care, resulting in ethical issues and moral distress. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of allied health professionals working in hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic, with attention to the ethical issues and moral distress these professionals might have encountered.
Methods and findings Lived experiences were collected in semi-structured interviews with a total of 39 allied health professionals working in four different hospitals. Interviews were held in June and July 2020, after waning of the first-wave of COVID-19 spreading in the Netherlands. Interpretative phenomenological analysis revealed four themes: ‘a disease with large impact’, ‘personal health and safety’, ‘staying human in chaotic times’ and ‘solidarity and changing roles’. Participant experiences show that the virus and COVID-19 measures had an enormous impact on the in-hospital working environment due to the massive downscaling of regular care, infection prevention measures and unknown risks to allied health professionals’ personal health. At the same time, participants experienced a certain freedom, which made room for authentic motives, connection and solidarity. The themes and accompanying ethical issues reflected a wide range of situations that were morally complex and led to moral distress.
Conclusions To diminish long-lasting negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and moral distress, employers should empathize with experiences of allied health professionals and create conditions for ethical reflection. Our data show that allied health professionals value professional autonomy. Creating room for professional autonomy makes them feel needed, connected and energized. However, the needs of allied health professionals may conflict with organizational rules and structures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), project number 10430042010031.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Radboudumc ethical committee (dossier number 2020-6520) judged that this study does not fall under the scope of the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO). General principles from the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice were followed.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are digitally secured at the Radboudumc and available upon reasonable request.
