IMPACT OF THE CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 PANDEMIC ON SURGICAL VOLUME IN JAPAN: A COHORT STUDY USING ADMINISTRATIVE DATA

1. Introduction

The rapid spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which first appeared in Wuhan, China, has been increasing and disrupting healthcare systems worldwide.¹ During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been over 4.5 million cases and over 300,000 deaths internationally, which has caused unprecedented challenges for surgical staff.^2-4 To minimise exposure to COVID-19 and save medical resources to prevent harmful outcomes for patients, cancellation or triage of surgeries are recommended.^3-5 Patients with critical disease and cancers should still receive surgery as usual, whereas cases with benign diseases can be postponed.^6-8

Previous studies suggest that there are wide variations of trends in the affected number of surgical procedures depending on the country and time period.^3,4,9 For example, estimates of cancelled or postponed surgeries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan were about 1.4 million cases (73% of the total), similar to other high-income countries.³ Of these, approximately 98,000 were oncological surgeries with a cancellation rate of 30% and the remaining 1,253,000 cases were benign surgeries with a cancellation rate of 84%.³ Referring to this estimate, the Japanese Surgical Society (JSS, which consists of 10 major surgical societies in Japan) announced the importance of triage by the patients’ severity and surgical recovery planning for the backlog of surgeries.¹⁰ A comprehensive surgical and medical care strategy is also recommended to prevent potential adverse health implications caused by surgical delays.¹¹

However, there are no studies on the trends of surgeries during the pandemic in Japan, one of the regions most affected by COVID-19 at the earliest stage of the pandemic and where the first wave of the pandemic converged most quickly (Figure 1). Several publications have dealt with the issue of triaging elective surgeries, but the types of surgeries affected remains unclear. In this report, we performed a retrospective cohort study discussing the impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on Japanese elective surgical procedures by major surgical types using administrative data in Japan. We sought to identify which surgical areas were the most affected by the COVID-19, and to statistically evaluate the decline in major operative procedures, referring to the priorities announced by each surgical society.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Trend of PCR tests for COVID-19 positive patients in Japan between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020, with major statement by the JSA, JSS, and Japanese government JSA, Japanese Society of Anaesthesiologists; JSS, Japan Surgical Society; PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction

2. Methods

2.2. Study population

Among QIP hospitals, we detected 254 hospitals, 672,772 cases of patients over 15 years old with surgery whose discharge summary was available from between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2020, which was used for interrupted time series analysis (ITS) analysis. Figure 2 shows the flow chart of selection processes for each analysis. After identification of the population for ITS analysis, to see the trend of the number of surgical cases during the first wave of the pandemic, we compared patients who were admitted and discharged between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 with those between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Flowchart depicting patient progression through the present study eligibility criteria HP, hospitals

2.4. Statistics

2.4.1. Descriptive statistics

The year-over-year trend of the case volume per month by the eight types of surgery between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 compared to that between July 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019 is presented in Figure 3, using line graphs. Especially, details of each surgical category in March, April, and May, which appear to be the first wave COVID-19 pandemic, were calculated.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3.

The year-over-year trend in the number of surgeries by the eight categories ENT, Ear/Nose/Throat

2.4.2. Interrupted time series analyses for changes in case rates

We used ITS, including segmented regressions, to ascertain volume changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic on population-level admissions. We statistically tested the changes of the volume of surgeries based on the date of discharge adjusted for seasonality through a Fourier term.¹⁸ We regarded comparing the volume of scheduled admissions with surgeries per month using the date of discharge rather than admission, to be appropriate because DPC data were generated after patients’ discharge. We hypothesise that COVID-19 would have affected the level change of scheduled admission volume especially after April 2020 as an implemented point, in which the Japanese Society of Anaesthesiologists and the JSS requested surgeons to triage some elective surgeries. We divided our datasets into two periods for ITS analysis: before the JSS surgical-triage-statement (July 2018 to March 2020) and after that (April 2020 to June 2020). Monthly case volumes of scheduled admission with surgery are presented in the figures using line graphs. Baseline demographics for the population for ITS analysis are listed in Supplemental tables 2∼10. Age was expressed as mean ± SD and LOS as median [interquartile range] and were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and compared using χ² tests. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Statistical analyses were performed with R version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University Graduate School, Kyoto, Japan (R0135). This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines for medical and health research involving human participants issued by the Japanese National Government. The data were anonymised, and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

3. Results

3.2. Abdominal surgery

Prior year comparison of stomach, colorectal, and HPB cancer were almost the same in March and April. However, benign surgeries were considerably lower in April and May than in the previous year (supplemental Figure 1: popular, 53.9%; other, 71.6%). According to the ITS analysis, the surgical volume of oncological surgeries was not statistically affected by COVID-19, whereas benign surgeries were affected (Figure 4: benign popular, p = 0.007; benign other, p = 0.018).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4.

Monthly discharge volume of each surgical category over time with interrupted time series analysis including segmented regressions. ENT, Ear/Nose/Throat

4. Discussion

Our study showed the trends of scheduled admission with surgery and important changes in surgical volume during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. The main findings of our study were as follows: first, we found the most affected practice was ENT surgery according to the year-over-year trend; second, even within the same category, benign surgeries that were considered non-critical tended to be significantly affected by the JSS’s announcement of surgical triage due to COVID-19.

First, the decline of oncological surgeries for gastrointestinal, HPB, lung, breast, and genitourinary cancer was not significant in the ITS analysis, even though there were reductions when compared to the same period of the last year. For patients who had nonfatal or did not require urgent medical intervention, JSS recommended postponement or performing surgery cautiously under appropriate infection control.⁵ Because of the risk of cancer-progression, prioritisation of procedures should consider available evidence on time for surgery and oncologic outcomes.^9,19,20 The American College of Surgeons also recommended that surgery for low-risk cancer should be deferred but should not be postponed for most other cancers.²¹ For example, our result for gastrointestinal cancer could reflect the recommendation because we did not include endoscopic procedures, which were usually performed for early stage cancer outside the operating room. However, our result for prostate cancer showed no downward trend, which was opposite to urological triage recommendations.²² This was probably because of the relatively affordability of hospital beds recruited in this study and the patients’ wishes to perform the surgery as scheduled. In terms of the benign abdominal, thoracic, and genitourinary surgeries, all but thoracic and popular-genitourinary decreased with p < 0.05 in ITS analysis. In our dataset, the most popular thoracic benign surgery was the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for the pneumothorax, and the most popular benign genitourinary was stone surgery. Both surgeries have a high priority and are basically recommended to be performed without delay.^5,9,22

Second, within cardiovascular surgery types, only other types of surgery obviously decreased. During the COVID-19 pandemic, management of ICU beds and ventilators is important. There is also concern about a remarkable reduction in blood donation because many cardiovascular surgeries require perioperative transfusion.^23,24 Considering the risk of COVID-19 infection and conservation of medical resources, certain surgical restrictions, such as delaying of surgery for stable patients or transferring a patient to near-by hospital, are recommended for cardiac and aortic surgery by the Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, as in western countries.^25-27 However, cardiovascular surgery is thought to be essential because of the risk of worsening or even death caused by surgical delay. For example, progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic (typically chest pain or shortness of breath) with valvular disease or aortic aneurysm can increase the risk of surgery, or even worse, make surgery impossible. Similarly, if the appropriate timing of surgery for dialysis fistula is missed, patient’s condition will become irreversible because of kidney failure. When medical resources, such as hospital beds, staff, and ventilators can be afforded to a certain extent, many cardiovascular surgeries should not be unnecessarily postponed, and such a trend was also observed in this study.

Third, within neurosurgery, although every type declined compared to the same period in the previous year, only intracranial surgery was significant with p < 0.05. According to a report by Johns Hopkins University, the decrease rate of cranial surgery cases was largest in the department of neurosurgery.²⁸ Triage of elective neurosurgery was basically judged by the symptoms, such as any signs of life-, limb- or vision-threatening conditions.²⁹ The Japan Neurosurgical Society also announced similar statements with only an additional alert about endoscopic surgery.³⁰ In this research, we chose surgeries for brain tumour, intracranial haemorrhage, and intracranial vascular as cranial surgery based on their popularity in the NDB. Because patients who underwent these surgeries after scheduled admission might possibly have had trivial symptoms, our results could have been affected by such selection effects. Spine surgery also decreased, although the ITS analysis was not significant. The Japan Neurosurgical Society announced that spine surgery is intermediate or high priory according to the symptoms.³⁰ Patients who received spinal injury often suffered from paralysis, which leads to decline in activities of daily living (ADL) or quality of life, and the complaints of symptoms had possibly become more pronounced, which might have led to our results.

Lastly, surgeries associated with quality of life such as orthopaedic, ophthalmologic, and ENT surgeries were focused on. Traumatic surgery is one that requires minimising preoperative delay and LOS despite a patient’s COVID-19 status at each hospital,⁹ although whether surgery is performed with optimal timing or not should be decided in each hospital based on restrictions on elective resources and procedures.³¹ Considering the necessity of traumatic surgery such as fracture, surgical volume might have declined because of the state of emergency declared by the government that led to people voluntarily refraining from going out. Some arthroplasty cases were performed for fracture patients, although most of them were for osteoarthritis. This might be because we selected only scheduled admission patients. Osteoarthritis decreases ADL regardless of there being a state of emergency, which could be related to our results. The Japanese Ophthalmological Society and Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan recommended cancellation or postponement of most elective surgeries because of the high probability of the COVID-19 virus being present in the nasal cavity, pharynx, and lacrimal fluid.^32,33 Moreover, both ophthalmologists and otolaryngologists are a high-risk category of COVID-19 infection because their daily outpatient and emergent patients have a high volume. In our study, the reason for the dramatic decrease in the surgical volume in otolaryngology and ophthalmology compared to other surgical categories might be that patients themselves were reluctant to be seen and that physicians in these two departments were strictly triaged by urgency.

Our study has several limitations. First, our target hospitals were 254 QIP participant that voluntarily provided DPC data. This study population may not have been comprehensive enough to be representative of the current situation in Japan because there are more than 8000 hospitals in Japan. In this study, participant hospitals had a variety of backgrounds and corona-positive patients were admitted in at least about half of the hospitals. We believe that selection bias was not very significant, and this result was important for understanding the future course of the pandemic. Second, we did not consider whether there was a trend for surgery originally performed in an inpatient setting for ambulatory surgery because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that some inpatient surgeries should be shifted to ambulatory surgery when possible and it is safe to do so, and the Ambulatory Surgery Center Association also cited the recommendation because of the risk of infection for medical staff and patients and the efficiency of medical resources.³⁴ Ambulatory surgery centres need to be prepared for the possibility of performing surgeries such as trauma and backlog surgeries that have never been experienced before depending on how the COVID-19 pandemic develops in the future. Finally, the ITS analysis was performed with DPC data based on the discharge date. The state of emergency declared by the government and surgical triage by each hospital for the COVID-19 pandemic would affect the date of admissions, not discharges. However, we could only acquire the data of patients who were discharged by June 30, 2020. That is why we separated the target population for descriptive analysis from that of ITS analysis. To support our results, we added information about the median and inter-quartile range of LOS that were varied from surgeries to the supplemental tables for ITS analysis.

In conclusion, we demonstrated and validated the trend of surgical volume reduction in Japan, by applying ITS analyses. The most affected practice was ENT surgery, especially popular surgeries, with declines of about 80%. Benign surgeries, except critical procedures, tended to be significantly affected by COVID-19. Future research should examine how hospitals recovered efficiently from the backlog of surgeries during this first wave of the pandemic, using more recent administrative data, to prepare for the next possible pandemic wave after winter 2020.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Figure legends

Supplementary Fig. 1. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within abdominal surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 2. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within thoracic surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 3. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within genitourinary surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 4. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within cardiovascular surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 5. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within neurosurgeries

Supplementary Fig. 6. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within orthopaedic surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 7. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within ophthalmologic surgeries

Supplementary Fig. 8. Year-over-year trend in number by major surgical type within Ear/Nose/Throat surgeries