Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Public perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 measures by self and others in the United Kingdom

Simon N Williams, Christopher J. Armitage, Tova Tampe, Kimberly Dienes
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.17.20233486
Simon N Williams
1Centre for People and Organisation, School of Management, Swansea University, Swansea, SA1 8EN
2Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States of America
Roles: Senior Lecturer in People and Organisation
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.n.williams@swansea.ac.uk
Christopher J. Armitage
3Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL
4Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9PL
Roles: Professor of Health Psychology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tova Tampe
5World Health Organisation, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
Roles: Independent Consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly Dienes
6Department of Psychology, School of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP
7Honorary Lecturer, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester
Roles: Lecturer in Clinical and Health Psychology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To explore the perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 policy measures by self and others in the UK, focusing on perceived reasons for non-adherence.

DESIGN Qualitative study comprising 12 online focus groups conducted between 25th September and 13th November 2020.

SETTING Online video-conferencing

PARTICIPANTS 51 UK residents aged 18 and above, reflecting a range of ages, genders and race/ethnicities.

RESULTS Participants reported seeing an increase in non-adherence in others and identified a number of challenges to their own adherence to measures. Thematic analysis identified six main themes related to participants’ reported reasons for non-adherence in self and others: (1) Alert fatigue (2) Inconsistent rules (3) Lack of trust in government (4) Helplessness (5) Resistance and rebelliousness (6) Reduced perception of risk and the prospect of a vaccine. Participants also raised concerns that adherence would be impacted by a desire to socialise over Christmas. Two forms of non-adherence were observed: overt rule- breaking and subjective rule interpretation.

CONCLUSIONS Adherence may be improved by: less frequent and clearer information on COVID-19 to reduce alert fatigue; implementing a more unified set of measures within and across countries in the UK; role modelling good adherence by authority figures; exploring ways to mitigate the impact that events like Christmas vaccine ‘breakthroughs’ may have on reducing adherence.

Competing Interest Statement

CJA is supported by NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre. TT is currently employed by the World Health Organization. The authors have no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Manchester Centre for Health Psychology based at the University of Manchester and Swansea University Greatest Need Fund

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was received by Swansea University School of Management Research Ethics Committee

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • s.n.williams{at}swansea.ac.uk

  • chris.armitage{at}manchester.ac.uk

  • tova.tampe{at}gmail.com

  • k.a.dienes{at}swansea.ac.uk

Data Availability

Ethical restrictions related to participant confidentiality prohibit the authors from making the data set publicly available. During the consent process, participants were explicitly guaranteed that the data would only be seen my members of the study team. For any discussions about the data set please contact the corresponding author, Simon Williams (s.n.williams@swansea.ac.uk).

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Public perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 measures by self and others in the United Kingdom
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Public perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 measures by self and others in the United Kingdom
Simon N Williams, Christopher J. Armitage, Tova Tampe, Kimberly Dienes
medRxiv 2020.11.17.20233486; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.17.20233486
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Public perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 measures by self and others in the United Kingdom
Simon N Williams, Christopher J. Armitage, Tova Tampe, Kimberly Dienes
medRxiv 2020.11.17.20233486; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.17.20233486

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (140)
  • Anesthesia (44)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (404)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (66)
  • Dermatology (47)
  • Emergency Medicine (141)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (168)
  • Epidemiology (4771)
  • Forensic Medicine (2)
  • Gastroenterology (172)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (666)
  • Geriatric Medicine (69)
  • Health Economics (187)
  • Health Informatics (614)
  • Health Policy (312)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (198)
  • Hematology (83)
  • HIV/AIDS (155)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5240)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (322)
  • Medical Education (88)
  • Medical Ethics (23)
  • Nephrology (72)
  • Neurology (674)
  • Nursing (41)
  • Nutrition (109)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (123)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (203)
  • Oncology (435)
  • Ophthalmology (137)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (88)
  • Pain Medicine (34)
  • Palliative Medicine (15)
  • Pathology (127)
  • Pediatrics (193)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (128)
  • Primary Care Research (82)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (757)
  • Public and Global Health (1784)
  • Radiology and Imaging (315)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (135)
  • Respiratory Medicine (254)
  • Rheumatology (86)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (67)
  • Sports Medicine (59)
  • Surgery (100)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (28)
  • Urology (37)