Abstract
The identification of a first case (e.g. by a disease-related death or hospitalization event) raises the question of the actual size of a local outbreak. Quick estimates of the outbreak size are required to assess the necessary testing, contact tracing and potential containment effort. Using general branching processes and assuming that epidemic parameters (including the basic reproductive number) are constant over time, we characterize the distribution of the first hospitalization time and of the epidemic size at this random time. We find that previous estimates either overestimate or largely underestimate the actual epidemic size. In addition, we provide upper and lower bounds for the number of infectious individuals of the local outbreak over time. The upper bound is the cumulative epidemic size, and the lower bound is a constant fraction of it. Lastly, we compute the number of detectable cases if one were to test the whole local outbreak at a single point in time. In a growing epidemic, most individuals have been infected recently, which can strongly limit the detection of infected individuals when there is a delay between an infection and its potential detection. Overall, our analysis provides new analytical estimates about the epidemic size at identification of a first disease-related case. This piece of information is important to inform policy makers during the early stages of an epidemic outbreak.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; CNRS Momentum grant
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
No IRB/oversight body approval needed.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Source codes for the generated data is available on github (see url in the manuscript).
