Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Scientific output on coronavirus and WHO’s Solidarity Project: a science-based choice?

View ORCID ProfileAndréia Cristina Galina, View ORCID ProfileDeise Sarzi, View ORCID ProfileLarissa Campos de Medeiros, View ORCID ProfileAndré Luiz Franco Sampaio, View ORCID ProfileJacqueline Leta
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.20232488
Andréia Cristina Galina
1Science Education Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andréia Cristina Galina
Deise Sarzi
1Science Education Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deise Sarzi
Larissa Campos de Medeiros
2Division of Communication, National Institute of Technology, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Larissa Campos de Medeiros
André Luiz Franco Sampaio
3Departament of Pharmacology, Institute of Drug Technology (Farmanguinhos), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for André Luiz Franco Sampaio
Jacqueline Leta
1Science Education Program, Institute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jacqueline Leta
  • For correspondence: jleta@bioqmed.ufrj.br
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Solidarity Program probably the largest global initiative to encourage and support research in four promising drugs and therapies (Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, β interferon and the combination Lopinavir / Ritonavir) to reduce the mortality of COVID-19. Considering the potential impact of this project to restrain the current pandemic, the present study aims to investigate whether it was designed upon a scientific basis. For this proposal, we collected all documents on coronavirus indexed in Scopus database by using a search strategy based in MESH terms. Among the studied groups of documents, we looked in more detail the Coronavirus group in order to find documents related to WHO’ s drugs or to other drugs and therapies extracted from another source. The main findings indicate that the number of documents related to WHO’s drugs are higher than in the other groups and this subset of documents involves a larger number of institutions and countries. Hence, the results shown in this study illustrate that decisions by an international body, as WHO, may be science-based and not be merely bureaucratic decisions.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors would like to thank the help of the doctoral student Stephanie Treiber during the earlier stage of the work. This work has financial support from Capes and CNPq through the Doctoral’s scholarships granted to Andreia Galina and to Deise Sarzi, and the CNPq funding awarded to the research project n. 434.146/2018-8.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data can not be shared because of they were retrieved from secondary sources, which do not allow the publicity.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 18, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scientific output on coronavirus and WHO’s Solidarity Project: a science-based choice?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Scientific output on coronavirus and WHO’s Solidarity Project: a science-based choice?
Andréia Cristina Galina, Deise Sarzi, Larissa Campos de Medeiros, André Luiz Franco Sampaio, Jacqueline Leta
medRxiv 2020.11.16.20232488; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.20232488
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Scientific output on coronavirus and WHO’s Solidarity Project: a science-based choice?
Andréia Cristina Galina, Deise Sarzi, Larissa Campos de Medeiros, André Luiz Franco Sampaio, Jacqueline Leta
medRxiv 2020.11.16.20232488; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.16.20232488

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Policy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1256)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
  • Dermatology (148)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10047)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2481)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1652)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11888)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2301)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1257)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (737)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2294)
  • Public and Global Health (4850)
  • Radiology and Imaging (846)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (228)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)