Abstract
Background There is increasing use of for machine learning-enabled tools (e.g., psychotherapy apps) in mental health care.
Objective This study aimed to explore postgraduate clinical psychology and psychotherapy students’ familiarity and formal exposure to topics related to artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) during their studies.
Methods In April-June 2020, we conducted a mixed-methods web-based survey using a convenience sample of 120 clinical psychology and psychotherapy enrolled in a two-year Masters’ program students at a Swiss university.
Results In total 37 students responded (response rate: 37/120, 31%). Among the respondents, 73% (n=27) intended to enter a mental health profession. Among the students 97% reported that they had heard of the term ‘machine learning,’ and 78% reported that they were familiar with the concept of ‘big data analytics’. Students estimated 18.61/3600 hours, or 0.52% of their program would be spent on AI/ML education. Around half (46%) reported that they intended to learn about AI/ML as it pertained to mental health care. On 5-point Likert scale, students moderately agreed (median=4) that AI/M should be part of clinical psychology/psychotherapy education.
Conclusions Education programs in clinical psychology/psychotherapy may lag developments in AI/ML-enabled tools in mental healthcare. This survey of postgraduate clinical psychology and psychotherapy students raises questions about how curricula could be enhanced to better prepare clinical psychology/psychotherapy trainees to engage in constructive debate about ethical and evidence-based issues pertaining to AI/ML tools, and in guiding patients on the use of online mental health services and apps.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was supported by the University of Basel, Switzerland.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by University of Basel
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Administered Survey & collected data: CL, JG, MA, AK, CB. Data analysis: AK and CL. Wrote the first draft of paper: CB, CL, AK, MA. Revised the manuscript: CB, CL, MA, AK and JG.
Data Availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.