Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study

Justus Scheder-Bieschin, Bibiana Blümke, Erwin de Buijzer, Fabian Echterdiek, Júlia Nacsa, Marta Ondresik, Matthias Ott, Gregor Paul, Tobias Schilling, Anne Schmitt, View ORCID ProfilePaul Wicks, View ORCID ProfileStephen Gilbert
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.20230953
Justus Scheder-Bieschin
1Department of Interdisciplinary Acute, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine (DIANI), Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bibiana Blümke
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erwin de Buijzer
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabian Echterdiek
3Department of Nephrology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Júlia Nacsa
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Ondresik
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthias Ott
1Department of Interdisciplinary Acute, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine (DIANI), Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregor Paul
4Department of Infectious Diseases, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tobias Schilling
1Department of Interdisciplinary Acute, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine (DIANI), Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Schmitt
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Wicks
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Wicks
Stephen Gilbert
2Ada Health GmbH, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 1, 10178 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephen Gilbert
  • For correspondence: science@ada.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Communication between patients and healthcare professionals is frequently challenging in the crowded emergency department (ED), with few opportunities to develop rapport or empathy. Digital tools for patients and physicians have been proposed as helpful but their utility is not established.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate a patient-facing digital symptom and history taking, as well as handover tool in the waiting room.

DESIGN A two-phase, questionnaire-based quality improvement study. Phase I observations guided iterative improvement, which was then further evaluated in Phase II.

SETTING ED of a German tertiary referral and major trauma hospital providing interdisciplinary treatment for an average of 120 patients daily.

PARTICIPANTS All patients who were willing/able to provide consent, excluding patients: (i) with severe injury/illness requiring immediate treatment; (ii) with traumatic injury; (iii) incapable of completing a health assessment; or, (iv) under 18 years old. Of 1699 patients presenting to the ED, 815 were eligible based on triage level. With available recruitment staff, 135 were approached, of whom 81 were included in the study.

INTERVENTION/OBSERVATION Patients entered information into the tool, which generated a handover report to be accessed via a clinician dashboard. All users completed evaluation questionnaires. Clinicians were trained to observationally assess the tool as a prototype, without relying upon it for clinical care.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient and clinician Likert scale ratings of tool performance.

RESULTS Respondents were strongly positive in endorsing the tool’s usefulness in facilitating conversation (75% of patients, 73% physicians, 100% nurses). Nurses judged the tool as potentially time saving, whilst physicians assessed it as time saving only in some ED medical specialisms (e.g. Surgery). Patients understood the tool questions and reported high usability. The proportion of patients, physicians and nurses who would recommend the tool was 78%, 53% and 76%.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The system has clear potential to improve patient-HCP interaction and make efficiency savings in the ED. Future research and development will extend the range of patients for which the history collection has clinical utility.

Question Can a patient-facing digital symptom and clinical history taking tool provide conversational support, aid in symptom taking, facilitate record keeping, and lead to improved rapport between patients, physicians and nurses in the emergency department (ED)?

Findings Acceptability was high, with improved rapport experienced 90% of the time for patients, 73% for physicians and 100% for nurses. Nurses assessed the tool as having workflow benefit through potential time saving. Physicians assessed the current tool design as providing time saving in certain ED medical specialisms including Surgery.

Meaning The patient-facing tool for symptom and history taking provided meaningful conversation support and showed potential for efficiency savings, however, further research and testing is required before time savings can be consistently delivered to ED clinicians across the range of relevant ED medical specialisms.

Competing Interest Statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Bluemke, Nacsa, Ondresik, Schmitt; Gilbert are employees of Ada Health GmbH and some of the listed hold stock options in the company. Wicks has a consultancy contract with Ada Health GmbH and is an employee of, and owns shares in, Wicks Digital Health. The Ada Health GmbH research team has received research grant funding from Fondation Botnar and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Wicks has received speaker fees from Bayer and honoraria from Roche, ARISLA, AMIA, IMI, PSI, and the BMJ. Funding This study was funded by Ada Health GmbH.

Clinical Trial

This is a quality improvement study, which did not collect patient outcomes data, and for this reason registration with a trial registry is not required either in law or by ICMJE guidelines.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Ada Health GmbH.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by the local ethics committee at the University of Heidelberg (No. S-052-2020).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data is included in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 16, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study
Justus Scheder-Bieschin, Bibiana Blümke, Erwin de Buijzer, Fabian Echterdiek, Júlia Nacsa, Marta Ondresik, Matthias Ott, Gregor Paul, Tobias Schilling, Anne Schmitt, Paul Wicks, Stephen Gilbert
medRxiv 2020.11.13.20230953; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.20230953
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study
Justus Scheder-Bieschin, Bibiana Blümke, Erwin de Buijzer, Fabian Echterdiek, Júlia Nacsa, Marta Ondresik, Matthias Ott, Gregor Paul, Tobias Schilling, Anne Schmitt, Paul Wicks, Stephen Gilbert
medRxiv 2020.11.13.20230953; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.13.20230953

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (175)
  • Allergy and Immunology (421)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (171)
  • Dermatology (102)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
  • Epidemiology (8794)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (405)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1864)
  • Geriatric Medicine (179)
  • Health Economics (388)
  • Health Informatics (1292)
  • Health Policy (644)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (493)
  • Hematology (207)
  • HIV/AIDS (396)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10575)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (218)
  • Neurology (1762)
  • Nursing (104)
  • Nutrition (267)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (343)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
  • Oncology (966)
  • Ophthalmology (283)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (177)
  • Pain Medicine (118)
  • Palliative Medicine (43)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (557)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (266)
  • Primary Care Research (221)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1846)
  • Public and Global Health (3992)
  • Radiology and Imaging (655)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
  • Respiratory Medicine (536)
  • Rheumatology (216)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (166)
  • Surgery (197)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (107)
  • Urology (80)