Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy

View ORCID ProfileAlan Middleton, Maria Pothoulaki, View ORCID ProfileMelvina Woode Owusu, View ORCID ProfilePaul Flowers, View ORCID ProfileFiona Mapp, Gabriele Vojt, Rebecca Laidlaw, View ORCID ProfileClaudia S Estcourt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20217612
Alan Middleton
1Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alan Middleton
  • For correspondence: alan.middleton@gcu.ac.uk
Maria Pothoulaki
1Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melvina Woode Owusu
2University College London
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Melvina Woode Owusu
Paul Flowers
3University of Strathclyde
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Flowers
Fiona Mapp
4UCL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fiona Mapp
Gabriele Vojt
1Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Laidlaw
5* Deceased 06/10/2019 Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia S Estcourt
1Glasgow Caledonian University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia S Estcourt
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives 1.5 million people in the UK have mild to moderate learning disabilities. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and blood borne viruses (BBVs) are over-represented in people experiencing broader health inequalities, which include those with mild learning disabilities. Self-managed care, including self-sampling for STIs/BBVs, is increasingly commonplace, requiring agency and health literacy. To inform the development of a partner notification trial, we explored barriers and facilitators to correct use of an STI/BBV self-sampling pack amongst people with mild learning disabilities.

Methods Using purposive and convenience sampling we conducted four interviews and five gender-specific focus groups with 25 people (13 female, 12 male), with mild learning disabilities (July-August 2018) in Scotland. We balanced deductive and inductive thematic analyses of audio-transcripts to explore issues associated with barriers and facilitators to correct use of the pack.

Results All participants found at least one element of the pack challenging or impossible but welcomed the opportunity to undertake sexual health screening without attending a clinic and welcomed the inclusion of condoms. Reported barriers to correct use included perceived overly complex STI/BBV information and instructions, feeling overwhelmed, and the manual dexterity required for blood sampling. Many women struggled interpreting anatomical diagrams depicting vulvo-vaginal self-swabbing. Facilitators included pre-existing STI/BBV knowledge, familiarity with self-management, good social support, and knowing that the service afforded privacy.

Conclusion In the first study to explore the usability of self-sampling packs for STI/BBV in people with learning disabilities, participants found it challenging to use the pack. Limiting information to the minimum required to inform decision-making, “easy read” formats, simple language, large font sizes and simpler diagrams could improve acceptability. However, some people will remain unable to engage with self-sampling at all. To avoid widening health inequalities, face-to-face options should continue to be provided for those unable or unwilling to engage with self-managed care.

Key messages

  • People with mild learning disabilities found the existing self-sampling pack overly complex; many would not use it and did not feel able to engage with self-managed care at all.

  • Minimum “need to know” information, very simple diagrams, and “easy read” formats specific to the needs of people with mild learning disabilities, could improve acceptability.

  • Adoption of self-sampling and other elements of self-managed care without provision of alternative care models could widen health inequalities.

  • Face-to-face options need to be provided but identifying those with limited health literacy will be challenging.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (reference number RP-PG-0614-20009). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in study design, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the report and the decision to submit the report for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval was obtained from Glasgow Caledonian University School of Health and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (HLS/PSWAHS/17/194).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [AM], upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 09, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy
Alan Middleton, Maria Pothoulaki, Melvina Woode Owusu, Paul Flowers, Fiona Mapp, Gabriele Vojt, Rebecca Laidlaw, Claudia S Estcourt
medRxiv 2020.11.06.20217612; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20217612
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How can we make self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted infections and blood borne viruses more inclusive? A qualitative study with people with mild learning disabilities and low health literacy
Alan Middleton, Maria Pothoulaki, Melvina Woode Owusu, Paul Flowers, Fiona Mapp, Gabriele Vojt, Rebecca Laidlaw, Claudia S Estcourt
medRxiv 2020.11.06.20217612; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20217612

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Sexual and Reproductive Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1093)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (195)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (499)
  • Epidemiology (9757)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2303)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1553)
  • Health Policy (732)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (602)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (501)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11631)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (616)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (256)
  • Neurology (2139)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (335)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1172)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (145)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (309)
  • Pediatrics (694)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (265)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2172)
  • Public and Global Health (4645)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (455)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (208)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)