Abstract
Objectives To analyse the changes in reported frequency of retinal detachment admissions and vitreo-retinal surgery procedures performed between 2000-2018 in England. To obtain information useful to contribute towards the planning of service delivery.
Methods Analysis of England’s Hospital Episode Statistics from the Health and Social Care Information Centre and population data from the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics.
Results Episodes of “retinal detachments with breaks” increased year on year from 3,447 (7.0/100M) in 2000 to 10,971 (19.7/100M) in 2018 (p<0.001), whereas records of “tractional retinal detachment” increased from 290 (0.6/100M) to 910 (1.6/100M) in the same period (p<0.0001). The number of reported pars plana vitrectomies irrespective of indication increased over fourfold from 5,761 to 26,900 (p<0.0001), while the number of scleral buckling records decreased by two thirds from 2,897 to 780 (p<0.0001). During the same period the population of England increased from 49.2 million-55.6 million, proportionally at a slower rate than that for recorded hospital episodes.
Conclusions The frequency of admissions to hospital for surgically treated retinal detachment seems to have been increasing significantly since 2000. This effect is more marked in cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This may be partially explained by repeat surgery in cases of recurrent retinal detachment. Other possible explanations may be increased incidence of disease (due to increased rates of cataract surgery, increasing longevity and rates of myopia), improvements in patient access, and increased public awareness. It is possible that this observation is due in part to local changes in methodology of hospital coding.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no external funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was carried out on publicly available data
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest The authors declare no potential of conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Data Availability
The data is publicly available at NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity
