Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Non applicability of validated predictive models for intensive care admission and death of COVID-19 patients in a secondary care hospital in Belgium

Nicolas Parisi, Aurore Janier-Dubry, Ester Ponzetto, Charalambos Pavlopoulos, Gaetan Bakalli, Roberto Molinari, Stéphane Guerrier, Nabil Mili
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20205799
Nicolas Parisi
1Departement of Anesthesiology, Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aurore Janier-Dubry
1Departement of Anesthesiology, Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ester Ponzetto
2Intensive Care Unit, Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charalambos Pavlopoulos
3Departement of Medical Imaging, Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaetan Bakalli
4GSEM, University of Geneva, Geneva Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Molinari
6Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane Guerrier
4GSEM, University of Geneva, Geneva Switzerland
5Faculty of Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nabil Mili
7University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nabil.mili@unil.ch
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To set up simple and reliable predictive scores for intensive care admissions and deaths in COVID-19 patients. These scores adhere to the TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) reporting guidelines.

Design Monocentric retrospective cohort study run from early March to end of May in Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies, a secondary care hospital located in Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. The outcomes of the study are (i) admission in the Intensive Care Unit and (ii) death.

Data sources All patients admitted in the Emergency Department with a positive RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 test were included in the study. Routine clinical and laboratory data were collected at their admission and during their stay. Chest X-Rays and CT-Scans were performed and analyzed by a senior radiologist.

Methods A recently published predictive score conducted on a large scale was used as a benchmark value (Liang score)1. Logistic regressions were used to develop predictive scores for (i) admission to ICU among emergency ward patients; (ii) death among ICU patients on 40 clinical variables. These models were based on medical intuition and simple model selection tools. Their predictive capabilities were then compared to Liang score.

Results Our results suggest that Liang score may not provide reliable guidance for ICU admission and death. Moreover, the performance of this approach is clearly outperformed by models based on simple markers. For example, a logistic regression considering only the LDH yields to similar sensitivity and greater specificity. Finally, all models considered in this study lead to levels of specificity under or equal to 50%.

Conclusions In our experience, the results of a predictive score based on a large-scale Chinese study cannot be applied in the Belgian population. However, in our small cohort it appears that LDH above 579 UI/L and venous lactate above 3.02 mmol/l may be considered as good predictive biological factors for ICU admission. With regards to death risk, NLR above 22.1, tobacco abuse status and 80 % of respiratory impairment appears to be relevant predictive factors. A predictive score for admission to ICU or death is desperately needed in secondary hospitals. Optimal allocation of resources guided by evidence-based indicators will best guide patients at time of admission and avoid futile treatments in intensive care units.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

ethics commitee OM45 President Dr.Pirenne B. Vice President Dr.Picard G. Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies ethique @cspo.be The ethics committee has given its agreement for a monocentric observational retrospective study

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data relevant to the study are included. No further data available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 09, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Non applicability of validated predictive models for intensive care admission and death of COVID-19 patients in a secondary care hospital in Belgium
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Non applicability of validated predictive models for intensive care admission and death of COVID-19 patients in a secondary care hospital in Belgium
Nicolas Parisi, Aurore Janier-Dubry, Ester Ponzetto, Charalambos Pavlopoulos, Gaetan Bakalli, Roberto Molinari, Stéphane Guerrier, Nabil Mili
medRxiv 2020.11.06.20205799; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20205799
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Non applicability of validated predictive models for intensive care admission and death of COVID-19 patients in a secondary care hospital in Belgium
Nicolas Parisi, Aurore Janier-Dubry, Ester Ponzetto, Charalambos Pavlopoulos, Gaetan Bakalli, Roberto Molinari, Stéphane Guerrier, Nabil Mili
medRxiv 2020.11.06.20205799; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.06.20205799

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (51)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (453)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (83)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (158)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (191)
  • Epidemiology (5275)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (197)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (759)
  • Geriatric Medicine (80)
  • Health Economics (213)
  • Health Informatics (700)
  • Health Policy (361)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (224)
  • Hematology (99)
  • HIV/AIDS (164)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5904)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (363)
  • Medical Education (105)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (83)
  • Neurology (769)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (132)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (144)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (234)
  • Oncology (481)
  • Ophthalmology (152)
  • Orthopedics (39)
  • Otolaryngology (95)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (20)
  • Pathology (141)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (99)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (865)
  • Public and Global Health (2028)
  • Radiology and Imaging (350)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (158)
  • Respiratory Medicine (287)
  • Rheumatology (94)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (74)
  • Sports Medicine (77)
  • Surgery (110)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)