ABSTRACT
Objective We present a semi-automated method for quantifying structural changes after epilepsy surgery that accounts for tissue deformation caused by resection. We demonstrate its utility by comparing the remote structural effects of two surgical approaches, the anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) and the selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH).
Methods We studied 37 temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients who underwent resective surgery. Patients were treated with either an anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL, N=21) or a selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH, N=16). All patients received same-scanner MR imaging preoperatively and postoperatively (5+ months after surgery). To analyze structural changes in remote brain regions, we (1) implemented an automated method for segmenting resections with manual review, (2) applied cost function masking to the resection zone, and (3) estimated longitudinal cortical thickness changes using Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs). We then compared post-operative changes in cortical thickness between the two surgical groups in brain regions outside the resected area.
Results Patients treated with ATL exhibited significantly greater cortical thinning globally when compared to patients treated with SAH (p = 0.049). There were significant focal differences between the two treatment groups in the ipsilateral frontal lobe (superior medial and medial orbital regions) and insula (p > 0.001, α = 0.05 Bonferroni corrected). No significant effects were seen in the contralateral hemisphere.
Significance We present and share a semi-automated pipeline for quantifying remote longitudinal changes in cortical thickness after neurosurgery. The technique is applicable to a broad array of applications, including surgical planning and mapping neuropsychological function to brain structure. Using this tool, we demonstrate that patients treated with SAH for refractory temporal lobe epilepsy have less postoperative cortical thinning in remote brain regions than those treated with ATL. We share all algorithm code and results to accelerate collaboration and clinical translation of our work.
KEY POINTS BOX
Different epilepsy surgical approaches lead to distinct patterns of postoperative cortical atrophy in remote brain regions
Patients treated with SAH have less postoperative cortical thinning than patients treated with ATL
The insula and frontal lobe demonstrated the greatest focal differences in postoperative cortical thinning when comparing SAH and ATL
Postoperative cortical thinning analyses may inform surgical planning and our understanding of cognitive sequelae
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
We would like to acknowledge our sources of support: NIH Virtual cortical resection R01 NS099348 (BL), Pennsylvania Health Research Formula Fund (BL), T32 NS091006 (BL), the Mirowski Family Foundation (BL), The Jonathan Rothberg Family Fund (BL), Neil and Barbara Smit (BL), the Thornton Foundation (KAD), K23 NS073801 (KAD), National Institutes of Health R01 NS075270 (VLM), R01 NS108445 (VLM), R01 NS110130 (VLM), R01 NS112252 (DJE) and R00 NS097618 (DJE) Additional training grant support by HHMI-NIBIB T32 EB009384 Training Program in Biomedical Imaging (TCA).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was approved by the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board and the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania. All participants gave informed consent.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data analyzed in the present study contains sensitive clinical information about patients and must go through formal approval at the collecting institution prior to being shared. It will be made available upon request to the authors, with appropriate institutional data sharing agreements and IRB approval in place. Anonymized data from select subjects are currently publicly available through https://www.ieeg.org/. The code for analyzing postoperative changes in cortical thickness for patients with resections will be made available at https://github.com/tcama/remote_effects. This code relies heavily on the Advanced Normalization Toolkit (ANTs) https://github.com/ANTsX/ANTs. Other code and toolkits are cited appropriately throughout the text. All data processing was done on a Linux server using MATLAB R2019b (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA) and Python 2.7 (Python Software Foundation, https://www.python.org/).
