Abstract
Background Intensive Care Unit (ICU), anaesthetic and theatres staff have faced significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic which have the potential to adversely affect their mental health
Aims To identify the rates of probable mental health disorder in ICU and anaesthetic staff in six English hospitals during June and July 2020
Methods An anonymised brief web-based survey comprising standardised questionnaires examining depression, anxiety symptoms, symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), wellbeing and alcohol use was administered to staff.
Results 709 participants completed the surveys comprising 291 (41%) doctors, 344 (48.5%) nurses, and 74 (10.4%) other healthcare staff. Over half (58.8%) reported good wellbeing, however 45.4% met the threshold for probable clinical significance on at least one of the following measures: severe depression (6.3%), PTSD (39.5%), severe anxiety (11.3%) or problem drinking (7.2%). 13.4% of respondents reported frequent thoughts of being better off dead, or of hurting themselves in the past two weeks. We found that doctors consistently reported better mental health than nurses.
Conclusions We found substantial rates of probable mental health disorders, and thoughts of self-harm, amongst ICU staff; these difficulties were especially prevalent in nurses. These results indicate the need for a national strategy to protect the mental health, and decrease the risk of functional impairment, of ICU staff whilst they carry out their essential work during COVID-19.
What is already known about this subject
Intensive care unit (ICU) staff are regularly exposed to traumatic situations as part of their job
Previous studies have shown them to be at risk of psychological and moral distress
Little is known about the mental health of ICU staff during the current pandemic
What this study adds
Almost half of ICU staff report symptoms consistent with a probable diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder, severe depression or anxiety or problem drinking
Around 1 in 7 ICU staff report recent thoughts of self-harm or of wanting to be better off dead
Nursing staff are more likely to report higher levels of distress than doctors or other clinical staff
What impact this may have on practice or policy
Healthcare managers need to prioritise staff mental health support and timely access to evidence based treatments for ICU staff
Supervisors and managers should be aware that a substantial proportion of ICU staff may perform less well because of their current poor state of mental health
More work is needed to understand whether the high levels of mental health symptoms identified in this study are truly indicative of high levels of clinical need for mental healthcare
Competing Interest Statement
KF works for NHS England. NG runs a consultancy which provides the NHS with active listening and peer support training.
Funding Statement
The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The need for ethical review was discussed with two university ethics committees, King's College London (KCL) and University College London (UCL). Both ethics boards confirmed that this project does not require ethical approval as it is a service evaluation since the participants used are not randomised, the protocol does not demand any change in the care being provided or any particular intervention, and the findings will not be generalisable outside of the groups of staff that are the focus of the survey. This is as per the definition provided by the NHS Health Research Authority "Is my study research?" decision tool which also confirmed that the study did not require review by a research ethics committee.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: The research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the University of East Anglia and Newcastle University. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England.
Competing interests: KF works for NHS England. NG runs a consultancy which provides the NHS with active listening and peer support training.
Ethical approval: The need for ethical review was discussed with two university ethics committees both of which confirmed that, as an anonymised audit and quality improvement exericise, the survey did not require ethical approval. The ethical committees notes that participants were not randomised, the evaluation protocol did not demand any change in care provision or any particular intervention and the findings would not be generalisable outside of the staff group that were the focus of the survey. The NHS Health Research Authority ‘is my study research?’ decision tool also confirmed that the study did not require review by a research ethics committee.
Data Availability
Data is not available for sharing.
