Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Predicting progression to septic shock in the emergency department using an externally generalizable machine learning algorithm

Gabriel Wardi, Morgan Carlile, Andre Holder, Supreeth Shashikumar, Stephen R Hayden, Shamim Nemati
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224931
Gabriel Wardi
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego
2Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gwardi@health.ucsd.edu
Morgan Carlile
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Holder
3Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Supreeth Shashikumar
4Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen R Hayden
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shamim Nemati
4Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective Machine-learning (ML) algorithms allow for improved prediction of sepsis syndromes in the ED using data from electronic medical records. Transfer learning, a new subfield of ML, allows for generalizability of an algorithm across clinical sites. We aimed to validate the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert (AISE) for the prediction of delayed septic shock in a cohort of patients treated in the ED and demonstrate the feasibility of transfer learning to improve external validity at a second site.

Methods Observational cohort study utilizing data from over 180,000 patients from two academic medical centers between 2014 and 2019 using multiple definitions of sepsis. The AISE algorithm was trained using 40 input variables at the development site to predict delayed septic shock (occurring greater than 4 hours after ED triage) at varying prediction windows. We then validated the AISE algorithm at a second site using transfer learning to demonstrate generalizability of the algorithm.

Results We identified 9354 patients with severe sepsis of which 723 developed septic shock at least 4 hours after triage. The AISE algorithm demonstrated excellent area under the receiver operating curve (>0.8) at 8 and 12 hours for the prediction of delayed septic shock. Transfer learning significantly improved the test characteristics of the AISE algorithm and yielded comparable performance at the validation site.

Conclusions The AISE algorithm accurately predicted the development of delayed septic shock. The use of transfer learning allowed for significantly improved external validity and generalizability at a second site. Future prospective studies are indicated to evaluate the clinical utility of this model.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Dr. Wardi is supported by the National Foundation of Emergency Medicine and funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (#GBMF9052). He has received speaker's fees from Thermo-Fisher and consulting fees from General Electric. Dr. Holder is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (#UL1TR002378 and #KL2TR002381). Dr. Nemati is funded by the National Institutes of Health (#K01ES025445), National Science Foundation (#1822378) Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (#HHSO100201900015C), and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (#GBMF9052). Dr. Carlile, Dr. Shashikumar and Dr. Hayden have no conflicts of interest to report.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Institutional review board approval of the study was obtained at both sites with a waiver of informed consent (Emory #110675 and UC San Diego #191098)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Dr. Wardi is supported by the National Foundation of Emergency Medicine and funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (#GBMF9052). He has received speaker’s fees from Thermo-Fisher and consulting fees from General Electric. Dr. Holder is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (#UL1TR002378 and #KL2TR002381). Dr. Nemati is funded by the National Institutes of Health (#K01ES025445), National Science Foundation (#1822378) Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (#HHSO100201900015C), and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (#GBMF9052). Dr. Carlile, Dr. Shashikumar and Dr. Hayden have no conflicts of interest to report.

Data Availability

Access to the computer code used in this research is available upon request to the corresponding author.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 04, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting progression to septic shock in the emergency department using an externally generalizable machine learning algorithm
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predicting progression to septic shock in the emergency department using an externally generalizable machine learning algorithm
Gabriel Wardi, Morgan Carlile, Andre Holder, Supreeth Shashikumar, Stephen R Hayden, Shamim Nemati
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20224931; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224931
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Predicting progression to septic shock in the emergency department using an externally generalizable machine learning algorithm
Gabriel Wardi, Morgan Carlile, Andre Holder, Supreeth Shashikumar, Stephen R Hayden, Shamim Nemati
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20224931; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224931

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Emergency Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (421)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (170)
  • Dermatology (102)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
  • Epidemiology (8783)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (405)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1861)
  • Geriatric Medicine (178)
  • Health Economics (388)
  • Health Informatics (1291)
  • Health Policy (644)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (491)
  • Hematology (207)
  • HIV/AIDS (394)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10557)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (218)
  • Neurology (1754)
  • Nursing (103)
  • Nutrition (266)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
  • Oncology (964)
  • Ophthalmology (282)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (176)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (43)
  • Pathology (264)
  • Pediatrics (557)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (219)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1843)
  • Public and Global Health (3983)
  • Radiology and Imaging (654)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
  • Respiratory Medicine (535)
  • Rheumatology (215)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (166)
  • Surgery (197)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (106)
  • Urology (80)