Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Prevalence of COVID-19 In Rural Versus Urban Areas in a Low-Income Country: Findings from a State-Wide Study in Karnataka, India

Manoj Mohanan, View ORCID ProfileAnup Malani, Kaushik Krishnan, Anu Acharya
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224782
Manoj Mohanan
1Duke University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anup Malani
2University of Chicago
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anup Malani
  • For correspondence: amalani@uchicago.edu
Kaushik Krishnan
3Center for Monitoring Indian Economy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anu Acharya
4Mapmygenome, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although the vast majority of confirmed cases of COVID-19 are in low- and middle-income countries, there are relatively few published studies on the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in these countries. The few there are focus on disease prevalence in urban areas. We conducted state-wide surveillance for COVID-19, in both rural and urban areas of Karnataka between June 15-August 29, 2020. We tested for both viral RNA and antibodies targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD). Adjusted seroprevalence across Karnataka was 46.7% (95% CI: 43.3-50.0), including 44.1% (95% CI: 40.0-48.2) in rural and 53.8% (95% CI: 48.4-59.2) in urban areas. The proportion of those testing positive on RT-PCR, ranged from 1.5 to 7.7% in rural areas and 4.0 to 10.5% in urban areas, suggesting a rapidly growing epidemic. The relatively high prevalence in rural areas is consistent with the higher level of mobility measured in rural areas, perhaps because of agricultural activity. Overall seroprevalence in the state implies that by August at least 31.5 million residents had been infected by August, nearly an order of magnitude larger than confirmed cases.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Action Covid-19 Team (ACT) grant awarded to IDFC Foundation (Mumbai, India).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by the Government of India (the Prime Minister's Principal Scientific Advisor's Office) and the Government of Karnataka. The study protocols were also approved by IRB / IEC committees at three institutions: Karesa (ECR/308/Indt/KA/2018, Approval date June 3, 2020), for Anu Acharya (Mapmygenome); Duke University (Protocol 2020-0553); and University of Chicago (IRB20-1484). Because Mohanan (Duke) and Malani (University of Chicago) only received de-identified data, the research was determined to be exempt from IRB review at their institutions.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

We will make test results available on a de-identified basis 9 months after publication.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 04, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence of COVID-19 In Rural Versus Urban Areas in a Low-Income Country: Findings from a State-Wide Study in Karnataka, India
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Prevalence of COVID-19 In Rural Versus Urban Areas in a Low-Income Country: Findings from a State-Wide Study in Karnataka, India
Manoj Mohanan, Anup Malani, Kaushik Krishnan, Anu Acharya
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20224782; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224782
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Prevalence of COVID-19 In Rural Versus Urban Areas in a Low-Income Country: Findings from a State-Wide Study in Karnataka, India
Manoj Mohanan, Anup Malani, Kaushik Krishnan, Anu Acharya
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20224782; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20224782

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (70)
  • Allergy and Immunology (168)
  • Anesthesia (49)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
  • Dermatology (55)
  • Emergency Medicine (157)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
  • Epidemiology (5216)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (194)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (750)
  • Geriatric Medicine (77)
  • Health Economics (212)
  • Health Informatics (694)
  • Health Policy (352)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
  • Hematology (98)
  • HIV/AIDS (162)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5816)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
  • Medical Education (102)
  • Medical Ethics (25)
  • Nephrology (80)
  • Neurology (758)
  • Nursing (43)
  • Nutrition (129)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
  • Oncology (475)
  • Ophthalmology (149)
  • Orthopedics (38)
  • Otolaryngology (93)
  • Pain Medicine (39)
  • Palliative Medicine (19)
  • Pathology (139)
  • Pediatrics (223)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
  • Primary Care Research (96)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (854)
  • Public and Global Health (1993)
  • Radiology and Imaging (344)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (157)
  • Respiratory Medicine (283)
  • Rheumatology (93)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
  • Sports Medicine (75)
  • Surgery (108)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (39)