Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.

Brian M. Pecson, Emily Darby, Charles N. Haas, Yamrot Amha, Mitchel Bartolo, Richard Danielson, Yeggie Dearborn, George Di Giovanni, Christobel Ferguson, Stephanie Fevig, Erica Gaddis, Don Gray, George Lukasik, Bonnie Mull, Liana Olivas, Adam Olivieri, Yan Qu, SARS-CoV-2 Interlaboratory Consortium
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20221622
Brian M. Pecson
aTrussell Technologies Inc., Oakland, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: brianp@trusselltech.com
Emily Darby
aTrussell Technologies Inc., Oakland, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles N. Haas
bDrexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yamrot Amha
cTrussell Technologies Inc., Pasadena, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitchel Bartolo
dTrussell Technologies Inc., Solana Beach, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Danielson
eCel Analytical Inc., San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yeggie Dearborn
eCel Analytical Inc., San Francisco, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Di Giovanni
fMetropolitan Water District of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christobel Ferguson
gThe Water Research Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Fevig
gThe Water Research Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Gaddis
hUtah Department of Environmental Quality, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Don Gray
iEast Bay Municipal Utilities District, Oakland, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Lukasik
jBCS Laboratories Inc., Gainesville, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonnie Mull
jBCS Laboratories Inc., Gainesville, Florida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liana Olivas
cTrussell Technologies Inc., Pasadena, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Olivieri
kEOA Inc., Oakland, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Qu
cTrussell Technologies Inc., Pasadena, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1 Abstract

In response to COVID-19, the international water community rapidly developed methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in untreated wastewater. Wastewater surveillance using such methods has the potential to complement clinical testing in assessing community health. This interlaboratory assessment evaluated the reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 standard operating procedures (SOPs), divided into eight method groups based on sample concentration approach and whether solids were removed. Two raw wastewater samples were collected in August 2020, amended with a matrix spike (betacoronavirus OC43), and distributed to 32 laboratories across the U.S. Replicate samples analyzed in accordance with the project’s quality assurance plan showed high reproducibility across the 36 SOPs: 80% of the recovery-corrected results fell within a band of +/- 1.15-log10 genome copies/L with higher reproducibility observed within a single SOP (standard deviation of 0.13-log10). The inclusion of a solids removal step and the selection of a concentration method did not show a clear, systematic impact on the recovery-corrected results. Other methodological variations (e.g., pasteurization, primer set selection, and use of RT-qPCR or RT-dPCR platforms) generally resulted in small differences compared to other sources of variability. These findings suggest that a variety of methods are capable of producing reproducible results, though the same SOP or laboratory should be selected to track SARS-CoV-2 trends at a given facility. The methods showed a 7-log10 range of recovery efficiency and limit of detection highlighting the importance of recovery correction and the need to consider method sensitivity when selecting methods for wastewater surveillance.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors would like to thank The Water Research Foundation (project No. 5089) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for funding this research.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

There was no IRB/oversight body

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 04, 2020.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.
Brian M. Pecson, Emily Darby, Charles N. Haas, Yamrot Amha, Mitchel Bartolo, Richard Danielson, Yeggie Dearborn, George Di Giovanni, Christobel Ferguson, Stephanie Fevig, Erica Gaddis, Don Gray, George Lukasik, Bonnie Mull, Liana Olivas, Adam Olivieri, Yan Qu, SARS-CoV-2 Interlaboratory Consortium
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20221622; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20221622
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.
Brian M. Pecson, Emily Darby, Charles N. Haas, Yamrot Amha, Mitchel Bartolo, Richard Danielson, Yeggie Dearborn, George Di Giovanni, Christobel Ferguson, Stephanie Fevig, Erica Gaddis, Don Gray, George Lukasik, Bonnie Mull, Liana Olivas, Adam Olivieri, Yan Qu, SARS-CoV-2 Interlaboratory Consortium
medRxiv 2020.11.02.20221622; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.02.20221622

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (62)
  • Allergy and Immunology (144)
  • Anesthesia (47)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (419)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (72)
  • Dermatology (49)
  • Emergency Medicine (147)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (174)
  • Epidemiology (4906)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (185)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (689)
  • Geriatric Medicine (72)
  • Health Economics (193)
  • Health Informatics (636)
  • Health Policy (322)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (209)
  • Hematology (86)
  • HIV/AIDS (157)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5408)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (333)
  • Medical Education (96)
  • Medical Ethics (24)
  • Nephrology (77)
  • Neurology (692)
  • Nursing (42)
  • Nutrition (115)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (128)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (211)
  • Oncology (447)
  • Ophthalmology (140)
  • Orthopedics (36)
  • Otolaryngology (91)
  • Pain Medicine (37)
  • Palliative Medicine (18)
  • Pathology (131)
  • Pediatrics (201)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (131)
  • Primary Care Research (88)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (787)
  • Public and Global Health (1832)
  • Radiology and Imaging (328)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (142)
  • Respiratory Medicine (257)
  • Rheumatology (87)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (69)
  • Sports Medicine (63)
  • Surgery (102)
  • Toxicology (23)
  • Transplantation (29)
  • Urology (38)