Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Analytical and Clinical Performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test

Andrea Alemany, Bàrbara Baro, Dan Ouchi, Maria Ubals, Marc Corbacho-Monné, Júlia Vergara-Alert, Jordi Rodon, Joaquim Segalés, Cristina Esteban, Gema Fernandez, Lidia Ruiz, Quique Bassat, Bonaventura Clotet, Jordi Ara, Martí Vall-Mayans, Camila G-Beiras, Ignacio Blanco, Oriol Mitjà
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.30.20223198
Andrea Alemany
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bàrbara Baro
3ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dan Ouchi
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Ubals
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marc Corbacho-Monné
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Júlia Vergara-Alert
4IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordi Rodon
4IRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joaquim Segalés
5UAB, CReSA (IRTA-UAB), Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
6Departament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, UAB, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cristina Esteban
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gema Fernandez
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lidia Ruiz
7IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quique Bassat
3ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
8Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique
9ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
10Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (University of Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain
11Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonaventura Clotet
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
12Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordi Ara
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
13Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martí Vall-Mayans
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Camila G-Beiras
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ignacio Blanco
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
13Gerència Territorial Metropolitana Nord, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oriol Mitjà
1Fight AIDS and Infectious Diseases Foundation, Badalona, Spain
2Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
12Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Vic, Spain
14Lihir Medical Centre - InternationalSOS, Lihir Island, Papua New Guinea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: omitja@flsida.org
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The current standard for COVID-19 diagnosis, RT-qPCR, has important drawbacks for its use as a tool for epidemiological control, including the need of laboratory-processing, high cost, and long turnaround from sampling to results release. Antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) provide a promising alternative for this purpose.

Methods We assessed the analytical and clinical performance of the Ag-RDT Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test (Abbott), using RT-qPCR as a reference test. The clinical performance was assessed using nasopharyngeal swabs, collected in routine practice for case confirmation and contact tracing, and nasal mid-turbinate swabs, collected in preventive screenings of asymptomatic individuals. Fresh samples were analysed by RT-q-PCR, stored at -80 °C, and analysed using the Ag-RDT according to the manufacturer instructions.

Findings The Ag-RDT had a limit of detection of 6·5×105 copies/reaction. The clinical performance was assessed on 1,406 frozen swabs with a PCR result available: 951 (67·7%) positive and 455 (32·4%) negative. The Ag-RDT identified the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in 872 of 951 PCR-positive samples (91·7%; 95% CI 89·8-93·4 and ruled out its presence in 450 of 455 PCR-negative samples (specificity 98·9%; 95% CI 97·5– 99·6). Sensitivity increased in samples with lower Ct values (Ct <25, 98·2%; Ct<30, 94·9%) and was higher among symptomatic cases (92·6%) and their contacts (94·2%) than among asymptomatic individuals (79·5%). In the setting of asymptomatic screening, sensitivity also increased with lower Ct values (Ct <25, 100%; Ct<30, 98·6%). Assuming a pre-test probability of 5%, the negative and positive predictive values were 99·6% (99·5 – 99·6) and 81·5% (65·0 – 93·2), respectively.

Interpretation The Panbio COVID-19 Ag-RDT has high sensitivity for detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal or nasopharyngeal swabs of both, symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The diagnostic performance of the test is particularly good in samples with viral loads associated with high risk of viral transmission (Ct <25), which show high positive and negative predictive values even when assuming a prevalence as low as 5%.

Funding Blueberry diagnostics, Fundació Institut d’Investigació en Ciències de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, and #YoMeCorono.org crowfunding campaing.

Evidence before this study On October 6, 2020, we searched PubMed for articles containing “Antigen”, “test”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “COVID-19” and “performance” in either the title or the abstract. We found five studies that showed the accuracy of point-of-care tests in identifying SARS-CoV-2 antigens for confirmation of clinically suspected COVID-19. We found high variability in the diagnostic accuracy of Ag-RDT. Most tests showed high specificity (i.e., 99% or higher), whereas sensitivity ranged from 11% to 92%; only one test reported sensitivity higher than 60%. We found no studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test. We found no studies that assessed the performance of Ag-RDT for population-level screening of asymptomatic individuals.

Added value of this study Our analysis provides information regarding the diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test when tested on 1,406 frozen samples of nasopharyngeal and nasal swabs collected in routine practice for diagnostic confirmation of symptomatic individuals with suspected COVID-19 or contacts exposed to a positive case, and preventive screenings of unexposed asymptomatic individuals. Compared with RT-qPCR as reference test, the Ag-RDT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 91·7% and 98·9%. Test sensitivity increased in samples with viral load associated with high risk of transmission (Ct <25), reaching more than 98%, regardless of the presence of symptoms.

Implications of all the available evidence Available evidence show variability in the diagnostic performance of marketed Ag-RDT. Our results provide substantial evidence that the point-of-care Panbio COVID-19 Ag Test can accurately identify SARS-CoV-2 antigens in people with suspected clinical COVID-19 as well as in asymptomatic people with high viral load and therefore, associated with higher risk of transmission. This finding represents a potentially useful advance for mass screening of asymptomatic people at the point-of-care.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Blueberry diagnostics, Fundacio Institut d'Investigacio en Ciencies de la Salut Germans Trias i Pujol, and #YoMeCorono.org crowfunding campaing.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

CEIc Hospital Germnas Trias i Pujol

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Both authors contributed equally

Data Availability

Data Available upon request to corresponding author

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 03, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test
Andrea Alemany, Bàrbara Baro, Dan Ouchi, Maria Ubals, Marc Corbacho-Monné, Júlia Vergara-Alert, Jordi Rodon, Joaquim Segalés, Cristina Esteban, Gema Fernandez, Lidia Ruiz, Quique Bassat, Bonaventura Clotet, Jordi Ara, Martí Vall-Mayans, Camila G-Beiras, Ignacio Blanco, Oriol Mitjà
medRxiv 2020.10.30.20223198; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.30.20223198
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test
Andrea Alemany, Bàrbara Baro, Dan Ouchi, Maria Ubals, Marc Corbacho-Monné, Júlia Vergara-Alert, Jordi Rodon, Joaquim Segalés, Cristina Esteban, Gema Fernandez, Lidia Ruiz, Quique Bassat, Bonaventura Clotet, Jordi Ara, Martí Vall-Mayans, Camila G-Beiras, Ignacio Blanco, Oriol Mitjà
medRxiv 2020.10.30.20223198; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.30.20223198

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (580)
  • Anesthesia (141)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1962)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (253)
  • Dermatology (187)
  • Emergency Medicine (335)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (703)
  • Epidemiology (11123)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (629)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3196)
  • Geriatric Medicine (310)
  • Health Economics (567)
  • Health Informatics (2049)
  • Health Policy (864)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (789)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (685)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12742)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (708)
  • Medical Education (318)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (337)
  • Neurology (3004)
  • Nursing (165)
  • Nutrition (465)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1561)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (186)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (914)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (386)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2799)
  • Public and Global Health (5613)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1101)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (637)
  • Respiratory Medicine (764)
  • Rheumatology (341)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (315)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (348)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)