ABSTRACT
The biological role of PBRM1 loss-of-function (LOF) mutations mediating response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains an area of active investigation. A recent study (hereafter, ‘the MSK study’) evaluated this hypothesis in a clinically heterogeneous single institution retrospective ccRCC cohort using targeted sequencing and did not find a univariable statistically significant association for PBRM1 LOF and time-to-treatment failure (TTF), but did report a significant association between continuous tumor mutational burden (TMB) and ICB TTF. We re-analyzed this cohort to (i) match the methodology from previous studies and (ii) account for differences in cohort development, statistical approaches, mutation classifications, and outcome measurements. Univariable analysis of the PBRM1 LOF mutation hypothesis, when performed analogously to prior studies, demonstrated a modest statistically significant association with TTF on ICB (p = 0.047; HR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.49 - 0.99). By contrast, when using the different methodology presented in the MSK study, statistical modeling demonstrated that there was insufficient power to detect this association given the altered classification scheme and modest effect size. In addition, after appropriately normalizing TMB to account for anomalous outliers, TMB was not significantly associated with ICB response in ccRCC. Thus, this study provides further support for the biological association between PBRM1 LOF and favorable clinical outcomes on ICB in specific ccRCC clinical contexts. However, we again strongly caution against interpreting that this PBRM1 biological association, likely one of many modest mediators of tumor-immune-stromal interactions, achieves broadly generalizable predictive biomarker status for ICB in diverse clinical contexts. The PBRM1 LOF biological association has only been shown to be modestly predictive in the post-VEGF TKI ICB-monotherapy ccRCC patient population. Given emerging data about the biological role of PBRM1 in contributing to interwoven immune and angiogenesis programs (among many others), and the rapidly shifting therapeutic combination strategies invoking these processes in ccRCC, focused biological and predictive biomarker analyses in specific clinical settings using appropriately annotated clinical trial cohorts are necessary.
Competing Interest Statement
Advisory/Consulting: Tango Therapeutics, Genome Medical, Invitae, Enara Bio, Janssen, Manifold Bio, Monte Rosa Research support: Novartis, BMS Equity: Tango Therapeutics, Genome Medical, Syapse, Enara Bio, Manifold Bio, Microsoft, Monte Rosa Travel reimbursement: Roche/Genentech Patents: Institutional patents filed on chromatin mutations and immunotherapy response, and methods for clinical interpretation
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is reanalysis of publicly available data
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data (as provided by the corresponding author of the initiating study) and code written to perform the analyses presented herein is available at: https://github.com/vanallenlab/PBRM1_MSK_RCC_analysis