Abstract
Background The testing of infected persons with SARS-CoV-2 is one of the cornerstones to deploy pandemic control strategies. The public diagnostic effort is particularly important among the most vulnerable socioeconomic districts where the state is the sole health provider, such as São Paulo state, the Brazilian epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods We developed an RT-PCR testing intensity effort index (RT-PCR TIEI) composed of seven indicators to assess the intensity testing efforts in the state of São Paulo. Each Regional Health Department (RHD) was scored using anonymized public data. We used dynamic time-series cross-sectional models to analyze the association between the RT-PCR TIEI in São Paulo state and its 17 RHDs from epidemiological weeks 10 to 35, and the proportion of the population living under a high level of socioeconomic vulnerability, dependent on public health service (SUS), per capita income, and population density. The regression models included an intercept and the lag of the RT-PCR TIEI, and standard errors were clustered by RHD.
Findings On average, the RT-PCR TIEI score was 23.50. The maximum (47.06) was reached in week 11 and declined in subsequent weeks. The lowest score (17.65) was reached in week 25. In the long-run, socioeconomic vulnerability is negatively associated with RT-PCR TIEI (p-value=0.000, 95% CI −0.896,−0.816), with a higher proportion of the population dependent on SUS (p-value= 0.000, 95% CI −0.877, 0.808) and with population density (p-value=0.000, 95% CI −0.857; −0.806).
Conclusion There was a decline in the state’s testing intensity as the pandemic advanced, and the most socioeconomic vulnerable RHDs showed the lowest values where local public laboratory presence is a predictor of a higher RT-PCR TIEI score. Thus, the low RT-PCR TIEI and local laboratory capacity inequality may affect surveillance capability, especially for the most socioeconomic vulnerable population.
What is already known?
In the absence of vaccines and specific medications, non-pharmacological strategies are among the most effective strategies to control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR tests are considered the first-best test for controlling the pandemic spread and an essential part of a surveillance strategy that should also include identifying and isolating infected individuals and ensuring the quarantine of people who were in contact with those who tested positive.
Few studies evaluated the intensity effort of RT-PCR testing in low and middle-income countries and how this measure is associated with socioeconomic variables.
What are the new findings?
A new comprehensive index based on seven indicators to measure and evaluate the intensity effort of RT-PCR testing based mainly on recommendations by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was used to analyze the RT-PCR testing intensity effort (RT-PCR TIEI) in the 17 Regional Health Departments (RHD) of the São Paulo state, the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.
The state of Sao Paulo advanced in the intensity of its testing efforts in the public health system using RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2; however, the RT-PCR TIEI declined as the pandemic advanced.
What the new findings imply?
The most socioeconomic vulnerable RHDs, which also depend to a greater extent on the public health system, obtained the lowest values.
The presence of a local laboratory in the RHDs also affected surveillance capabilities during the studied period.
- Public Health Surveillance
- Coronavirus
- Pandemics
- Accessibility of Health Services, Access, and Evaluation
- Health Services
- Health Status Disparity
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Research fellowships were provided by the Institutos Betty e Jacob Lafer, Tide Setubal, and Cebrap. N.M. received a research grant from the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) - (2016/13199-8).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Since all data used in this manuscript are provided by open access source the IRB and/or ethics committee approvals is not applicable.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript are provided by open access platforms. The source of all data used in our manuscript are presented below: Sao Paulo. Sistema de Monitoramento Inteligente - SIMI-SP [Internet]. Available: https://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/planosp/simi/ Sao Paulo State. Plano Sao Paulo [Internet]. Available: https://www.saopaulo.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/PlanoSP-apresentacao-v2.pdf SEADE. Sistema de projecoes populacionais para os municipios do estado de Sao Paulo. [Internet]. Available:http://produtos.seade.gov.br/produtos/projpop/pdfs/projpop Sao Paulo State. Indice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social [Internet]. Available: http://ipvs.seade.gov.br/view/pdf/ipvs/estado.pdf Sao Paulo State. Estimativa da populacao SUS dependente (com base na saude suplementar). [Internet]. Available: http://tabnet.saude.sp.gov.br/deftohtm.exe?tabnet/ind47b_matriz.def Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistic (IBGE). Census 2010 [Internet]. Available: https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultado
