Abstract
Aim To study whether employees in occupations that typically imply close contact with other people are at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) and related hospitalization, for the 1st and 2nd wave of infection in Norway.
Methods In 3 553 407 residents of Norway on January 1st 2020 aged 20-70 (with mean [SD] age 44.1 [14.3] years and 51% men), we studied whether persons in occupations in touch with pupils/students/patients/customers (using Standard Classification of Occupations [ISCO-08 codes]) had a higher risk of 1) COVID-19 and 2) hospitalization with COVID-19, compared to everyone aged 20-70 years using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex and birth country.
Results Nurses, physicians, dentists, physiotherapists, bus/tram and taxi drivers had 1.5-3.5 times the odds of COVID-19 during the 1st wave of infection when compared to everyone in their working age. In the 2nd wave of the epidemic, bartenders, waiters, food service counter attendants, taxi drivers and travel stewards had 1.5-4 times the odds of COVID-19 when compared to everyone in their working age. Teachers had no or only a moderately increased odds of COVID-19. Occupation may be of limited relevance for the odds of severe COVID-19, here studied as hospitalization with the disease.
Conclusion Studying the entire Norwegian population using international standardized codes of occupations, our findings may be of relevance to national and regional authorities in handling the epidemic. Also, our findings provide a knowledge foundation for the more targeted future studies of lockdown and disease control measures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional board review was conducted, and the Ethics Committee of South-East Norway confirmed (June 4th 2020, #153204) that external ethical board review was not required. From our ethics comittee application: Knowledge of transmission, health service use and hospitalization for different geographic groups (e.g. municipality), in particular health personell, teachers and child care workers, waiters, taxi drviers etc is crucial for the emergency preparedness nationally and locally. Of particular importance are occupational risks for health personnel and others working in the health services, and how the authorities' measures to limit transmission (school lock downs, restrictions on travel, social distancing etc) impacts transmission to e.g. teachers, child care workers, hair dressers, taxi drviers etc. Further, it is important to study other sociodemographic factors of whom are being tested (age, sex, geography, etc.) and whom are testing positive (virus and antibodies), as well as how the testing and the results are within families.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are not publicly available.
