Psychological and social impact of COVID-19 in Pakistan: Need for Gender Responsive Policies

Background

The occurrence of novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 was first detected in December, 2019 in Wuhan, China (1). On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the disease as a global pandemic. Within two weeks of this announcement, COVID-19 cases outside of China had increased 13-fold with the number of affected countries rising by 3-fold (2). Since its emergence, there are more than 15.2 million confirmed global cases of the virus with the number of deaths exceeding 623,000 as of 23July, 2020. In the initial stages of the outbreak, most cases of COVID-19 that were exported internationally had a history of prior travel to Wuhan (3). Despite its close geographic proximity with China and Iran, the first two cases of COVID-19 in Pakistan were reported on February 26, 2020 (4). To curb the spread of the virus, Provincial Governments in Pakistan initiated partial and subsequent, complete lockdowns in their respective administrative territories. These measures however, were taken in phases, with educational institutions across the country closing on 13 March, 2020 in response to the pandemic (5). As of 23 July, 2020, Pakistan has over 260,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19, and approximately 5,700 deaths (1).

Exposure to a traumatic event, such as a global health crisis, is associated with an increased incidence of anxiety and depression (6). Moreover, the stigma and isolation due to infectious diseases could generate anxiety (7). A study conducted on a sample of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) survivors in Hong Kong revealed increased levels of psychological distress and anxiety, not only during the epidemic but also one year following the outbreak (8). Another research concluded that SARS had long-term psychiatric effects on survivors, with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive disorders being the most prevalent conditions recorded (9). Moreover, a US survey conducted during the H1N1 pandemic, with 7236 participants, suggests an increase in the prevalence of anxiety (10). Similarly, one internet survey conducted in China (n=7,236) reported that over one third participants exhibit symptoms of anxiety disorders during the COVID-19 outbreak while, one fifth recently experienced sleep issues and depressive symptoms (11).

Past research during large epidemics/pandemics, such as during the Ebola outbreak of 2014-2016in West Africa suggests that women may be disproportionately impacted during public health emergencies. The COVID-19 pandemic is also expected to affect women’s health and increase their short-term and long-term needs for livelihood support, and health (12). One study in the heavily impacted areas around Wuhan, highlighted an increase of 7% in prevalence of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), and women had significantly higher levels of PTSS than men (13). One study conducted in Turkey revealed that the pandemic had a greater psychological impacted on women than men. In this study of 343 respondents, women had significantly higher depression and anxiety scores (14). During the SARS epidemic, people with higher levels of anxiety were frequently found to adopt precautionary behaviours (15). Studies conducted in Singapore and Hong Kong also report that women were more likely to adhere to precautionary behaviours during SARS than men (16). Similarly, women in the UK were found to practice precautionary behaviours such as hand washing and disinfecting surfaces more often than men (17).

Female responses to stress and trauma may be contributing factors towards anxiety. Studies also indicate that gendered responses to trauma contribute to the greater onset of depression and PTSD in women (18,19). Evidence attributes this to women’s belief that worry is uncontrollable, and may cause anxious thoughts (20). The manner in which young boys and girls are socialised into their gender roles has an impact on these perceptions. A review discussed how mothers are more likely to converse about their emotional condition with their daughters as compared to with their sons (21). Further, young boys are conditioned to exercise problem-solving skills for managing their emotions, girls are traditionally granted less autonomy. This increases their dependency on others, and reduces the capability to effectively cope with anxious thoughts (21).

This study aims to assess gender differences in perceived risk, anxiety levels and behavioural responses to COVID 19. This study uses sociocultural patterns to examine the effect of age, gender, and household income on anxiety levels, and develops gender responsive policy options for grappling with the pandemic in Pakistan.

METHOD

Results

A total of 1391 participants’ responses were included in the analysis. Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, and household income) of women and men which are comparable. Majority of the respondents were aged between 25-34 years (69% women and 66% men) and possessed a Bachelor’s Degree or above (75% women and 79% men). About 29% of women and 17% men preferred not to disclose their household income. Around one-third of women (32%) and two-fifths of men (40%) mentioned that their household income is below PKR 60,000. More women (69%) than men (40%) from Karachi participated in the survey (Table 1).

Around three-fourths of respondents perceived that they (strongly agree/agree: 71% women vs. 73% men) and their family (strongly agree/agree: 74% women vs. 73% men) might be infected with COVID-19 if no preventive measures were taken. However, significantly more women than men considered symptoms of COVID-19 (if infected) as severe (very severe/severe: 46% women and 39% men, p-value: 0.045). On probing regarding, 59% women vs. 73% men perceived themselves likely to survive an infection (Table 2).

Women were also reported to have a higher anxiety score (Mean ± SD: 6.80 ± 3.61 in women, and 5.93 ± 3.58 in men, p-value: <0.001).. Furthermore, the depression score was high among women (Mean ± SD: 8.39 ± 3.93 in women 8.01 ± 3.69 in men, p-value: <0.079). More women were found to be depressed compared to men, with 58% of women and 54% of men scoring above the depression cut-off point(≥ 8).Around three-fifths of the respondents (strongly agree/agree: 58% women and 61% men) mentioned that COVID-19 had affected their jobs.

About three-fourths of the respondents (strongly agree/agree: 73% women and 74% men) also expressed concerns that the current pandemic is impacting their personal life. About two-fourths of the respondents believed that their sleeping pattern (strongly agree/agree: 40% women and 39% men) and eating habits (strongly agree/agree: 36% both women and men) have been disturbed due to COVID-19. Significantly more men compared to women mentioned that they might start/increase cigarette consumption (strongly agree/agree: 6% women vs. 11% men, p-value: <0.001), and might resort to the use of recreational drugs such as marijuana, crystallised methamphetamines, cocaine or opium products etc. (strongly agree/agree: 4% women vs. 6% men) (Table 3).

Significant differences were identified between women and men in adopting several precautionary measures such as washing their hands with soap/sanitizer frequently (100% women vs. 98% men, p-value: 0.012), wearing masks (93% women vs. 92% men, p-value: 0.025), covering nose and mouth while sneezing or coughing (98% women vs. 95% men, p-value: 0.043), avoiding contacting people who have fever or respiratory symptoms (95% women and 91% men), avoiding going out (87% women vs. 71% men, p-value: <0.001), avoiding crowded areas (96% women and 92% men, p-value: 0.003), refraining from going to hospital or clinic (78% women and 71% men, p-value: <0.001), avoiding to go to work (72% women and 57% men, p-value: <0.001), avoiding social events (97% women and 93% men, p-value: 0.046), and avoiding domestic travel (93% women and 86% men, p-value: <0.001). (Table 4.)

Information about COVID-19 provided by the doctor was considered reliable by significantly more women compared to men (very reliable/reliable: 91% women and 88% men, p-value: 0.041). Most of the respondents (very reliable/reliable: 81% women and 82% men) thought that the information provided through official websites such as those run by the government is reliable. Significantly more men than the women believed that the radio (very reliable/reliable: 46% women vs. 55% men, p-value: 0.014), and family or friends (very reliable/reliable: 46% women vs. 55% men, p-value: 0.003) are reliable sources for gaining information about COVID-19. Furthermore, television (very reliable/reliable: 57% women vs. 61% men), newspaper (very reliable/reliable: 56% women vs. 58% men), magazine (very reliable/reliable: 39% women and 44% men), social media such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram (very reliable/ reliable: 28% women vs. 32% men) and unofficial websites (very reliable/reliable: 22% women and 31% men) were considered as reliable information sources by more men than women. (Table. 5)

Table 6 demonstrates the predictors of anxiety. Gender, age, and household income had a significant positive association with anxiety. Women were nearly two times more likely to be anxious than men (aOR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.26-2.28). Moreover, respondents of a younger age (25-34 years) (aOR 2.30, 95% CI: 1.26-4.18) were nearly two times more likely to have anxiety than respondents above 55 years of age. Respondents with a household income between PKR 60,000 and PKR 120,000 were more likely to have anxiety than respondents with a household income of >PKR 120,000 (aOR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.27-2.67).

Table 7 shows the predictors of depression. Only household income was found have a significantly positive association with depression in multivariate analysis. Respondents having a household income of PKR 60,000 – PKR 120,000 were more likely to have anxiety in comparison with respondents who had a household income of >PKR 120,000 (aOR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.38-2.87).

Discussion

This study assessed how gender roles in Pakistan can impact anxiety levels and behavioural responses among men and women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both men and women were found to be mildly anxious due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, compared to men, more women perceived the disease to be fatal, and were more likely to engage in preventive behavior. These results highlight a greater need to develop gender-responsive policies in the fight to contain COVID-19.

Overall, fewer women than men responded to the questionnaire. This may be due to a prominent male dominated access to internet facilities in Pakistan. Indeed, several reports on internet penetration found that, at least three-fourths of internet and social users in the country are male (25). In Pakistan, cellular devices remain the most frequent means of accessing internet facilities, and there is a gender gap of 38%in mobile phone ownership (26).

There were also significant differences in respondents’ city of permanent residence. Three-fifths of all the female participants, and two-fifths of the males were from Karachi. This was expected, as the survey tool was disseminated over a Karachi-based university hospital’s Facebook page. The remaining respondents were from Punjab and Sindh. There are significant provincial disparities in access to internet facilities. Islamabad Capital Territory has the highest internet penetration, followed by Punjab and Sindh (27). The fewest respondents were from Balochistan, further reflecting the province’s poor internet accessibility. One-third of the male respondents were from smaller cities and towns throughout the country, compared to one-tenth of women. Differences in the nature of Pakistani men in smaller towns/cities may impact mobile phone ownership and social media usage, and explain why fewer women were from these towns and cities (28).

Although men and women considered themselves equally susceptible to a COVID-19 infection, women were more likely to perceive the disease to be fatal. This is a misperception, as gender-disaggregated data (until 24 June) on COVID-19 in Pakistan shows that three-quarters of diagnosed cases and deaths were among males, compared to a quarter among females (29). Gender-specific patterns of smoking are implicated as a significant contributor to disease severity among men (30). Indeed, this study also suggested that men were twice as likely as compared to women in reporting that either they might start smoking cigarettes and using recreational drugs or their usage might increase. These gender disparities in use of tobacco and narcotics are frequently seen in Pakistan (31–33). Furthermore, men are more likely to suffer from non-communicable diseases (34). Research suggests that excess mortality during the pandemic is higher than if these surplus deaths were caused by COVID-19 alone, particularly among cancer or heart disease patients and are attributable to delays in seeking or obtaining lifesaving care (35,36). Furthermore, women, particularly working mothers, tend to spend more time than men focused on medical issues related to their family’s healthcare, as well as their own (37). This could explain why women are more likely to believe that the disease symptoms are severe, with a low likelihood of survival.

Despite at being lower risk, women were more likely to conform to preventive measures. This included practicing social distancing measures, such as avoiding going to meat shops/market, going out, and going to work. One digital ethnographic study suggests that the majority of the population in Pakistan was in favor of continuing prayers in mosques while 1 in 4 men reported to have attended Friday prayers (38). Other studies also demonstrate men’s priorities during the pandemic. A comparison of COVID-19-related content shared on Twitter by men and women based in the U.S. found that women were more likely to tweet about family, social distancing and healthcare whereas men were more likely to tweet about sports cancellations and politics (39).

While this finding might imply that men are considerably less interested in social distancing practices, only one-fifth of the Pakistani women contribute to the labor force and wherein men constitute a majority of waged and salaried workers in cities and women contribute to over 70% of share of work in agriculture and informal sectors (40).These differences in employment could explain why men are less likely to conform to social distancing practices than women. In order to improve the labor forces’ capacity to work from home, initiatives should be taken to improve telecommunication facilities (including improving internet service provision).

Differences were also seen in practicing hygiene measures, such as disinfecting floors and tables at home (with phenyl products). School closure, lockdown and work-from-home orders have resulted in women carrying a double shift of home-schooling and working responsibilities. This increases the proportion of paid and unpaid labour in women’s work (41). Working mothers spend more hours engaged in household work and child care than their husbands (42). One study conducted in the United Kingdom during the lockdown estimates that, on average, mothers spend 11 more hours weekly on childcare than fathers. Single parents have less time to spend on childcare than partnered mothers, as they are single-handedly forced to bear the brunt of the shifts in the job market (43). This additional housework could result in women permanently exiting from the labor market. These developments are concerning, and emphasize the urgent need to develop labour policies which protect women in the workforce.

Women were more likely to report that they avoid going to hospitals. Furthermore, they were also more likely to perceive that doctors were a reliable source of information. It may be too soon to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on maternal and child health services, but one study estimates that a modest decline of 10% in coverage of pregnancy-related and newborn health care in lower-middle income countries could result in an additional, 1.7 million women who give birth, and 2.6million newborns who need urgent medical care (44). Studies conducted during the 2013–2016 Ebola outbreak in Western Africa show how sexual and reproductive health was adversely impacted by strains on health care systems, which often resulted in interruptions of care, and redirected resources (45–49). Similar reduction in access can be seen during the current pandemic. Clinics operated by Marie Stopes International, which is the largest private provider of family planning services in India, had to halt operations due to the country-wide lockdowns (50). Similarly, Marie Stopes International reports that its activities have been reduced by up to 40% in Pakistan due to the pandemic (51). Furthermore, some studies noted how diversion of staff and funding from maternal, neonatal and child health programmes to the front-line of the COVID-19 response has also decreased the quality of services available to women (52–54)

A larger number of men than women considered radio to be a reliable source of information. Pakistan has a considerable audience of radio programming. One study found that radio has the largest listeners in Sindh (60%), followed by Balochistan (53%), KPK (52%) and Punjab (19%), particularly in rural areas and small towns (55). Therefore, this gendered difference in trusting radio could be explained by the significantly larger proportion of men who came from smaller cities and towns. Furthermore, men in this study were more likely to trust friends and family than women. Pakistanis are considered to be a collectivistic society, with an emphasis on men engaging in commitments to the members of their ‘group’, friends and family (56). Similarly, men were more likely to trust social media sources than women. The lockdown enforced due to COVID pandemic has resulted in online activity substituting social activity between families, and may be considered as representative of a given person’s public interactions (38,39). While one study found that the public was often skeptical of official figures on COVID-19, but most polling suggests that Pakistanis in general are confident in the government’s management of the crisis (4,5). This is in contrast with Syria, where experiences of war, and propaganda campaigns by the state and its opponents, meant that Syrians were very distrustful of official news sources (38). Facebook users were much more likely to share official news sources. Therefore, radio content, as well as shareable social media content might be an appropriate avenue to provide targeted health information to men and improve their risk perceptions and subsequent indulgence in precautionary measures

In this study, women depicted higher levels of anxiety and depression in comparison with men, which suggests that they hold a greater psychiatric burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. One study conducted in India found that 33% of the respondents had experienced either depression or anxiety as a result of COVID-19 (57). Another study in China established that 54% of respondents suffered some psychological impact from the outbreak (58). In both studies, women were found to have suffered a greater psychological impact due to the pandemic as compared to men. Similarly, our findings corroborate with data from Turkey, where women had significantly higher scores of depression and anxiety (14). Research conducted in China also reports that women may be three times more anxious than their male counterparts because of COVID-19 (11,54,58). These results align with previous studies which show that women have a higher vulnerability for developing anxiety disorders (59)

There are many possible sources of this concern. Apart from their professional role, women serve as primary caregivers within their family (57). Women’s greater sensitivity towards familial roles and responsibilities was also reflected in a research which noted that pregnant women had heightened stress levels regarding the health status of their older relatives, their children and then their unborn baby during COVID-19 (60). One study found that family income stability and social support networks were protective factors against anxiety (61). Given the difficulties in forming stable social support networks during pandemic-induced lockdowns, as well as women’s lower likelihood of seeking medical care, this psychological support could be provided via telemedicine or other online platforms which can connect them to qualified psychiatrists. The timely and effective provision of such psychological support is also imperative for literate women that are already suffering from mental illness and feel that their symptoms have aggravated due to the ongoing pandemic.

Conclusion

This study assessed the gender differences in risk perceptions (susceptibility and severity of the disease), preventive behaviour (social distancing, enhanced hygiene measures), and anxiety. The results highlight the need for gender-responsive policies in mitigating the health and economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The global economy has grinded to a stop, and respondents face severe economic uncertainty. Differences in type-of-work, based on gender, may result in men being unable to maintain social distancing. Furthermore, it results in women being burdened with increasing house work, which can impact their ability to engage in professional work. This indicates the urgent need to develop labour laws to protect the workforce, particularly women. Furthermore, the results indicate potential avenues of disseminating gender-specific health communication. Involving doctors in healthcare communication targeting women, focusing on their need to avoid skipping hospital appointments, might prove effective. Research is required to assess strategies of reducing the frequency of in-person MNCH appointments, and the potential of telemedicine in all women to remain in contact with the health system, As men are more likely to trust what they read on social media, especially if it is shared by friends or family, social media campaigns and radio programming may be effective in disseminating information and the latter could be an effective tool to reach towns and cities. This health communication should include messages about men’s higher risk of dying, due to COVID-19, a lack of NCD management, and smoking cessation. Most importantly, based on the discussion, policy measures must be taken to ensure the continued provision of quality healthcare to women. This must include provisions to mitigate the growing anxiety among women, and compensate for the loss of social support networks during pandemic times.

Differences in type-of-work, based on gender, may result in men being unable to maintain social distancing. Furthermore, it results in women being burdened with increasing house work, which can impact their ability to engage in professional work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

FR conceived the study, guided data collection and reviewed all drafts of the manuscript. HAK and ARK adapted the questionnaires and wrote the manuscript. SP analyzed and narrated the data. HAK and ARK edited and revised multiple drafts of the manuscript. ARK also assisted in adapting the questionnaires and posting it on social media channels of AKU. All authors reviewed and endorsed the final submission.

Funding

The authors did not receive any direct funding for the purpose of this study.