Abstract
Background The Covid-19 pandemic has caused generous and well-developed healthcare systems to collapse. This paper quantifies how much system congestion may have increased mortality rates, using distance to the ICU as a proxy for access to emergency care.
Methods We match daily death registry data for almost 1,500 municipalities in Lombardy, Italy, to data on geographical location of all ICU beds in the region. We then analyze how system congestion increases mortality in municipalities that are far from the ICU through a differences-in-differences regression model.
Findings We find that Covid-19 mortality is up to 60% higher in the average municipality – which is 15 minutes driving away from the closest ICU – than in a municipality with an ICU in town. This difference is larger in areas and in days characterized by an abnormal number of calls to the emergency line.
Interpretation We interpret these results as suggesting that a sudden surge of critical patients may have congested the healthcare system, forcing emergency medical services to prioritize patients in the most proximate communities in order to maximize the number of lives saved. Through some back-of-the-envelope calculations, we estimate that Lombardy’s death toll from the first Covid-19 outbreak could have been 25% lower had all municipalities had ready access to the ICU. Drawing a lesson from Lombardy’s tale, governments should strengthen the emergency care response and palliate geographical inequalities to ensure that everyone in need can receive critical care on time during new outbreaks.
Funding No funding.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No funding received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
no patients data used
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the OECD or its member countries. We are grateful to Richard Baldwin, Travers Barclay Child, Emanuele Ciani, Viktar Fedaseyeu, Pilar Garcia-Gomez, Massimo Giuliodori, Sergi Jiménez-Martín, Luca Marcolin, Owen O’Donnell, Magdalena Rola-Janicka, Stefan Thewissen and seminar participants at CEIBS and the OECD for helpful feedback and discussion.
† Ciminelli: Asia School of Business (gabriele.ciminelli{at}asb.edu.my), MIT Sloan School of Management (gcimin{at}mit.edu); Garcia Mandicó: OECD (Silvia.Garcia-Mandico{at}oecd.org)
Change in title => "Emergency Care" changed with "Healthcare"
Data Availability
Data available upon request
