The mass balance model of obesity explains the weight loss advantage of a low-carbohydrate diet over a isocaloric low-fat diet

Summary

Currently, obesity treatment rests on the “calories-in, calories-out” (CICO) rule, formally named the energy balance theory (EBT). It maintains that body weight (BW) increases as food calories are greater than expended calories but decreases when the opposite occurs; hence, weight stability is expected at energy balance meaning that over time energy-in equals energy-out.¹ It follows that dietary regimens with identical energy content should evoke similar amounts of weight and fat loss with only minor differences that follow from diet’s macronutrient composition⁷, e.g., diet-induced glycogen depletion and water excretion. A vast collection of evidence shows, however, that low-carbohydrate diets typically result in much greater weight and fat loss than isocaloric low-fat diets.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12} Furthermore, our recent mathematical analysis demonstrated that weight stability coincides with a persistent energy imbalance and not otherwise.⁴ As an alternative, the mass balance model (MBM) was proposed that fitted weight loss data and explained the often superior weight loss evoked by low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets.⁴ Here, we expand on these observations by computationally contrasting the predictions of both models in two scenarios described in the literature^{3, 16}: altering the diet’s macronutrient composition while energy intake is kept at weight maintenance level; and the weight loss response as diet composition is changed under untreated type 1 diabetes. Our results indicate that MBM predictions are remarkably accurate while those of the EBT are clearly erroneous. These findings may represent the beginning of a paradigm shift in obesity research.