Abstract
Objective To describe the spectrum of neurological and psychiatric complications in patients with Covid-19 seen in a multidisciplinary center over six months.
Methods We conducted a retrospective, observational study on all patients showing neurological or psychiatric symptoms in the context of Covid-19 seen in the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry of the APHP-Sorbonne University. We collected demographic data, medical and treatment history, comorbidities, symptoms, date of onset, and severity of Covid-19 infection, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, neurological and psychiatric examination data and, when available, results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, brain magnetic resonance (MRI) imaging, 18-fluorodesoxyglucose-position emission computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)), electroencephalography (EEG) and electroneuromyography (ENMG).
Results 245 patients were included in the analysis. One-hundred fourteen patients (47%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 10 (4%) died. The most frequently reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were motor deficit (41%), cognitive disturbance (35%), impaired consciousness (26%), psychiatric disturbance (24%), headache (20%) and behavioral disturbance (18%). The most frequent syndromes diagnosed were encephalopathy (43%), critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (26%), isolated psychiatric disturbance (18%), and cerebrovascular disorders (16%). No patients showed evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in their CSF. Encephalopathy was associated with greater age and higher risk of death. Critical illness neuromyopathy was associated with an extended stay in the ICU.
Conclusions The majority of the neuropsychiatric complications recorded could be imputed to critical illness, intensive care and systemic inflammation, which contrasts with the paucity of more direct SARS-CoV-2-related complications or post-infection disorders.
Introduction
Covid-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has spread since December 2019 and was soon declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). An initial Chinese cohort of 214 Covid-19 patients reported a high frequency of neurological symptoms (36%), including non-specific manifestations such as headache, confusion and myalgia, but also strokes and seizures. A French study in 58 intensive-care unit (ICU) patients further reported a high frequency of encephalopathy and corticospinal signs 1. Since then, a variety of neurological complications have been described, including cerebrovascular complications 2–5, encephalitis6,7, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) 8, seizures 9,10, myelitis 11, Guillain-Barré syndrome 12, cranial nerve palsies 13,14, anosmia and dysgeusia 15–17. Several studies have raised concerns about a high prevalence of anxiety, mood disorders and post-traumatic stress disorders in Covid-19 patients 18.
Most of our knowledge of neuropsychiatric complications of Covid-19 derives from case reports and case series. Studies presenting a wider picture of these complications and of their relative frequency are lacking 19.
In France, the Paris area has been particularly hit by the outbreak with more than 18,000 patients hospitalized and 6,000 deaths in March and April 2020. The Department of Neurology and Psychiatry of the Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) – Sorbonne University has been involved in the care of patients affected by Covid-19 and showing neurological or psychiatric symptoms.
Here, we describe the detailed spectrum of neuropsychiatric disorders in 245 Covid-19 patients seen in the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry of APHP - Sorbonne University Hospitals over a six-month period.
Methods
Study design and population
This is a retrospective, observational study conducted consecutively on all patients with neurological or psychiatric symptoms in the context of Covid-19 seen between March 1st and August 28th at the APHP– Sorbonne University, which groups five University teaching Hospitals in the East of Paris (Pitié-Salpêtrière, Saint-Antoine, Tenon, Rothschild, Charles-Foix hospitals). Investigators were physicians from the Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, which includes all medical units in the field of adult neurology, neurovascular, neurological intensive care, neurorehabilitation, psychiatry, neurophysiology, and neuropathology of these hospitals. During the outbreak, neurologists and psychiatrists were directly in charge of patients with Covid-19 showing neuropsychiatric complications, either hospitalized (in their own units or other units such as pneumology, infectious diseases, and ICU) or as outpatients. Geriatricians, rehabilitation doctors and neuroradiologists were also involved in reporting cases.
All consecutive in- or out-patients, aged 18 years or older, with Covid-19 and de novo neurological or psychiatric symptoms were included in the study. Patients showing uniquely anosmia and/or dysgeusia were not included. Exclusion criteria were patients who refused the use of their data, and prisoners.
The primary objective of the study was to describe the full spectrum of neurological and psychiatric complications in Covid-19 patients.
Data collection
Data was collected retrospectively by investigators from medical records and entered into a structured case report form. Items collected included demographic data, medical and treatment history, comorbidities, symptoms, date of onset, and severity of Covid-19 infection, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, neurological and psychiatric examination, and, when available, results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, brain imaging (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18-fluorodesoxyglucose-positron emission computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT)), electroencephalography (EEG) and electroneuromyography (ENMG).
Covid-19 was defined by at least one of the three following criteria: a) positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in swab or upper pulmonary samples, or positive serology; b) thoracic radiological findings typical of SARS-CoV2 infection in the context of pandemic outbreak; c) suspected Covid-19 infection according to WHO guidance criteria 20. The severity of Covid-19 was the status of the patient at the nadir of the disease according to the seven levels as defined by the WHO: 1-not hospitalized, no limitation in daily life activity; 2-not hospitalized, with limitation in daily life activity; 3-hospitalized, no oxygen requirement; 4-hospitalized, necessitating oxygen; 5-hospitalized, necessitating non-invasive ventilation or Optiflow™; 6-hospitalized, necessitating intubation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 7-death.
The investigators completed the database consisting of a predefined list of neurological and psychiatric characteristics (symptoms, clinical signs, date of onset). Each item was scored as present, absent or unknown (no clinical evaluation available), and a final neurological or psychiatric syndrome was determined. One patient may have had one or more neurological or psychiatric diagnosis during Covid-19. One investigator (C.D.) reviewed all cases, and classified the diagnoses according to criteria of the Liverpool Brain infections Group (Neuro Network) 21. When a patient had more than one diagnosis, the diagnoses were classified as primary (pronounced) or secondary. In the case of conflicting diagnoses, the investigator who entered the case data was contacted to reach consensus.
Standard Protocol Approvals
The study was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice, the French regulation for retrospective studies on clinical data, and was compliant with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the French Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) rules. All patients (or their relatives in cases of impaired consciousness) received written information about the research, and consented to the use of their data. The study received the approval of the Sorbonne University Ethics Committee (N°2020 CER-202028). The study is registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website (NCT04362930).
Statistical analysis
For the analyses, we grouped the 7-level Covid-19 severity score into four categories: 1-not hospitalized (levels 1 and 2); 2-hospitalized without intensive care (levels 3 and 4); 3-hospitalized with intensive care (levels 5 and 6); 4-death (level 7). Kruskal-Wallis tests and Fisher’s Exact tests were used to compare overall differences between groups in demographics and clinical data. Pairwise comparisons were performed using pairwise Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests and pairwise Fisher’s Exact tests with Benjamini-Hochberg method to correct for multiple testing.
In order to investigate the effects of simultaneous risk factors of Covid-19 severity, we performed adjacent category ordinal logistic regression on the four grouped categories of the 7-levels score. Risk factors were age, gender, presence of at least one comorbidity, and presence of obesity.
Presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms, clinical examination features and syndromes were assessed on non-missing data.
For the correlation matrix, we calculated the Pearson correlation for inter-relationships between the following variables: age, gender, presence of one comorbidity, ICU hospitalization, and the various neurological syndromes. Hierarchical clustering was applied with the single linkage distance.
The risk factors for the most frequent neurological syndromes were analyzed using the Classification And Regression Tree (CART) algorithm. The CART algorithm, also known as a “decision tree”, is a non-parametric supervised technique that combines variables in such a way as to best discriminate two groups. For each neurological syndrome, we trained one tree to depth 4 through entropy minimization. The trees are purely descriptive. Statistical analyses were performed using R 3.6.1. and package VGAM_(version 1.1-3) for the ordinal logistic regression (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.) and using python 3.8 with the scikit learn 0.23.2 package for decision trees and correlation matrices 22.
Data Availability
Anonymized data is available upon request to the corresponding author by request from any qualified investigator.
Results
Patient characteristics
During the study period, 1,979 patients were admitted with a diagnosis of confirmed Covid-19 in our center. A total of 249 (12%) Covid-19 patients with a de novo neurological or psychiatric manifestation were included in the database. Three patients were excluded because they withdrew consent for the use of their data, and one patient was excluded because he did not fulfill the diagnosis criteria for Covid-19 after careful case review. The population analyzed consisted of 245 cases.
The characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1. There were more male (n=148, 60%) than female patients and the median age was 64 years (range 18-98 years), with 58% of patients over 60 and 12% under 40 years. The Covid-19 diagnosis was confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in 204 (89%) patients, and typical thoracic CT results was available in most of the patients (81%). The most frequent symptoms of Covid-19 were fever (76%), cough (63%), dyspnea (60%) and fatigue (50%). One-hundred and fourteen patients (47%) were admitted to the ICU with a median stay of 27 days, and 10 (4%) died. Male gender, non-Caucasian origin, and the presence of comorbidities (obesity, diabetes, cardiopathy, cancer) were associated with a greater Covid-19 severity. Higher age was associated with greater Covid-19 severity but not with ICU admission (Tables 1 and 2).
Neurological and psychiatric symptoms and signs
Neuropsychiatric symptoms were very diverse (Figure 1A). The most frequently reported neuropsychiatric symptoms were motor deficit (41%), cognitive disturbances (35%), impaired consciousness (26%), psychiatric disturbance (24%), headache (20%) and behavioral disturbance (18%).
A. Neuropsychiatric symptoms repartition. For each symptom, the number and percentage of non-missing patients is given below.
B. Delay between symptom and COVID onset for each symptom. Median, first and third quartiles are represented. The number of subjects with the symptom as well as the percentage of available delays among them are given below.
Psychiatric symptoms were detailed for 29 (12%) of patients. The most frequent psychiatric symptoms were depressed mood (n=13, 48%), agitation (n=11, 38%), loss of appetite (n=9, 32%), social anxiety (n=8, 28%), insomnia and persecution (n=6, 21%, each), anger (n=3, 11%), fear of death (n=4, 14%), and suicidal thoughts (n=3, 11%).
The delay between Covid-19 symptoms onset and the appearance of neuropsychiatric symptoms was highly variable and ranged from 3 to 116 days (Figure 1B). Some symptoms appeared soon after Covid-19 onset: myalgia (median 0 days), headache (0 days), anosmia (0 days), dysgeusia (1 day), gait impairment (10 days). Conversely, some symptoms appeared with a delayed onset, such as sensory symptoms (24 days), psychiatric disturbances (25 days), or motor deficits (28 days).
Clinical examination features are presented in Figure 2. All types of neurological signs were observed, the most frequent being motor deficit (41%), cognitive disturbance (38%) including frontal syndrome (14%), temporo-spatial disorientation (33%), memory (26%) or language (18%) disorders. Cranial nerve examination was abnormal in 21% of the patients (cranial nerve II: 2 patients, III, IV or VI: 15 patients, V: 4 patients, VII: 16 patients, VIII: 2 patients, IX or X: 12, XI: 4 patients, XII: 5 patients), either seen in the context of brainstem global dysfunction or isolated cranial nerve palsies. Movement disorders, mostly myoclonus and myoclonic tremor, were seen in 14% of the patients and cerebellar syndrome in 2%. Pyramidal syndrome was present in only 12% of the patients and areflexia in 10%.
For each feature, the number and percentage of non-missing patients is given below.
Paraclinical explorations
CSF was collected in 53 (22%) patients. Only six patients (11%) showed evidence of CSF hypercellularity (leucocytes >5/mm3), ranging from 6 to 205 leucocytes /mm3. Protein count was above 0.40g/l in 17 patients (0.42 – 2.9g/l). SARS-CoV-2 PCR was negative in the CSF for all patients in which this analysis was performed (38 patients).
Brain MRI was performed in 119 patients and was abnormal in 81 patients (68%, 9 patients with missing data). In most cases, MRI findings were non-specific and the main features have been described elsewhere 23.
Eight patients underwent brain FDG-PET/CT imaging, which was abnormal in six patients. FDG-PET/CT features in some of these patients have been reported elsewhere 24. EEG was performed in 82 patients and was abnormal in 54 patients (77%, 12 with missing data). Detailed EEG data is part of another paper (Lambrecq et al., under review). Pathological EEG findings included focal abnormalities, metabolic-toxic encephalopathy, periodic discharge and epileptic activity.
ENMG was carried out in 25 patients and was abnormal in 20 patients with evidence of peripheral nervous system impairment (87%, 2 patients with missing results).
Syndromes and causes of neuropsychiatric complications
The most frequent syndromes were encephalopathy (42%), critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (26%), isolated psychiatric disturbance (18%), and cerebrovascular disorders (16%) (Figure 3A). Other syndromes were much rarer: persistent headache (7%), seizures (6%), isolated movement disorders (4%), cognitive disturbance without encephalopathy (3%), encephalitis (3%). Guillain-Barré syndrome was observed in five patients, and isolated cranial nerve impairment in five patients. Two patients had posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). One patient had myelitis confirmed on spine MRI. Three patients displayed a cerebellar syndrome. Three patients had signs of brainstem impairment. Four patients complained of subjective sensory signs without ENMG abnormalities. Two patients showed somatoform disorders.
A. Neuropsychiatric syndromes repartition. For each syndrome, the number and percentage of non-missing patients is given below.
B. Delay between syndrome and COVID onset for each syndrome. Median, first and third quartiles are represented. The number of subjects with the syndrome as well as the percentage of available delays among them are given below.
The delay between Covid-19 onset and each neuropsychiatric syndrome onset is presented in Figure 3B. A wide range of delay was seen across and within each diagnosis, with several trends. Cerebrovascular disorders, cognitive disturbance, headache and psychiatric disturbance usually occurred within the first ten days following Covid-19 onset. Conversely, myelitis, encephalitis and cranial nerve palsies occurred around 15 days, Guillain-Barré and somatoform disorders around 25 days, and critical-illness neuromyopathy after 28 days from Covid-19 onset.
Encephalopathy
Among patients with encephalopathy, 56% were hospitalized in the ICU. Twenty percent of patients with encephalopathy had a pre-existing neurological disorder, mostly neurodegenerative disorders with pre-existing dementia. Seventy percent of the patients with encephalopathy had at least one cardiological, respiratory or metabolic comorbidity. The most common clinical presentations of encephalopathy were confusion, ICU-delirium, and delayed awakening after stopping sedative drugs.
Among the ten deceased patients, seven (70%) showed encephalopathy. With respect to risk ratios, encephalopathy mainly concerned patients over 60 (Table 3). In the correlation matrix, encephalopathy was associated with higher age, death, cardiac and diabetic comorbidities (Figure 4A).
A. Correlation matrix between neuropsychiatric syndromes, comorbidities and other related variables. Shades of red indicates a positive correlation. The variables were clustered by minimizing the single linkage distance.
B. Decision tree trained to predict whether a patient who went to ICU had an ICU neuropathy or not. The depth of the tree was imposed to 4 and trained through entropy minimization. 114 patients went to ICU and 60 had an ICU neuropathy.
Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy
Critical illness neuropathy or myopathy was diagnosed in the recovery phase after sedative drug reduction in the ICU. ENMG findings were available for 22% of these patients. Several patterns of neuromuscular injury were observed: i) axonal sensorimotor polyneuropathy, ii) myopathy, iii) troncular nerve compressions (median, ulnar, peroneal, lateral femoral cutaneous nerves), iv) brachial plexopathy. Brachial plexopathy was only seen in patients after remaining prone for extended periods. Thirty-seven percent of the patients with critical illness polyneuropathy had pre-existing diabetes.
The decision tree showed that a stay exceeding 12.5 days was the strongest feature predictive of a neuropathy after entering the ICU (Figure 4B).
Psychiatric disorders
Among the 28 patients with available details for their psychiatric disturbances, 71% had a pre-existing psychiatric disorder (depression (70%), anxiety disorders (20%), psychosis (20%), bipolar disorder (10%), substance abuse disorder (5%)).
The most commonly observed psychiatric disorders in the context of Covid-19 infection were anxiety disorders (25%), depression (18%), psychosis (20%), adjustment disorders (7%) and acute stress (3%).
Cerebrovascular disorders
Thirty-eight patients (16%, median [Q1,Q3] age 62.3 [52.1,70.1]; 26 males, 68%) suffered strokes with the following proportions: 32 (84%) ischemic strokes (regional or multiple small infarcts), three (8%) parenchymal hematomas, one subarachnoid hemorrhage and one cerebral venous thrombosis. Patients with cerebrovascular disorders had the following cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension (22, 58%), diabetes mellitus (13, 34%), dyslipidemia (9, 24%) and obesity with body mass index ≥30 (7, 18%). The correlation matrix indeed showed the association between cerebrovascular disorders and comorbidities (smoking, pulmonary disorder, cancer) (Figure 4A). Seven patients had a history of previous stroke. Unusual symptoms at presentation (which were not explained by infarct location or metabolic disturbances) were frequently found such as delirium (13/32, 40%) or apathy (5/38, 13%).
Seizures
Among the 14 patients with seizures, none had a previous history of epilepsy. One patient was under treatment for Parkinson’s disease with dementia and one patient for glioblastoma. Three patients had a focal seizure without generalization, one patient a focal to bilateral generalized seizure, seven patients a generalized seizure, one patient a status epilepticus.
Cranial nerve palsies
Five patients presented with cranial nerve palsies. One patient had VIth nerve palsy with normal MRI and CSF examination. As she was a heavy smoker, a thrombosis triggered by the Covid-19 infection was suspected. One patient presented with optic neuritis, in the setting of a possible inflammatory disorder of the CNS (inflammatory lesions on brain MRI, oligoclonal bands in the CSF). One patient presented with IIIrd nerve partial palsy after an ICU stay. One patient presented with unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy, and one with combined homolateral X, XI and XII nerves palsies, while in the ICU, which were attributed to mechanical complications of positioning, intubation, or jugular catheterizations.
Headaches
Isolated major headache was the primary diagnosis in 16 patients (7%). Headaches often had migraine characteristics. None of the patients had pre-existing migraines. Among patients with headache, eight underwent brain MRI, which was normal in seven patients and showed a non-specific lesion in one. Two had lumbar puncture (normal in both). None of the patients had evidence of meningitis or intracranial hypertension. In the correlation matrix, headache is associated with younger patients who were not hospitalized and showed no associated comorbidities (Figure 4A).
Encephalitis
Only seven patients fulfilled criteria for encephalitis. Among those seven patients, one patient had positive PCR for varicella-zoster-virus (VZV) in the CSF, suggesting concomitant VZV encephalitis. One patient had an encephalopathy with myoclonus and inflammatory brain lesions, one patient had cognitive disturbances with myoclonus and CSF pleiocytosis, one patient had brainstem impairment, movement disorders and dysautonomia with white matter lesions on MRI, two patients showed alterations of consciousness with white matter lesions on MRI, one patient had confusion with MRI features of limbic encephalitis. Several of these patients have been already reported 25.
Guillain-Barré
Five patients were diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome, three of them being hospitalized in the ICU. One patient had a pre-existing demyelinating Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. In four patients, Guillain-Barré syndrome presented with severe motor deficit of all four limbs. One of the patients had associated bilateral facial nerve palsy. CSF showed elevated protein in two patients (1.1g/l and 1.65 g/l). Four patients underwent ENMG, which showed typical characteristics of acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy in all of them.
Discussion
We have described a wide range of neuropsychiatric symptoms and syndromes occurring in Covid-19 patients seen in a single multidisciplinary center over a six month period. The major categories of neuropsychiatric manifestations in our cohort were: encephalopathy, critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy, psychiatric disturbance, and cerebrovascular complications.
The prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms among patients seen in our Covid-19 center was 12%. The prevalence of neurological signs reported in previous studies has been very variable, depending on inclusion criteria and evaluation methods, varying between 4.2% 26 and 57.4% 27. The relatively lower prevalence in our study may be due to the strict inclusion criteria and the exclusion of patients with isolated symptoms of anosmia or dysgeusia. Our cohort of patients was comparable to previous cohorts in terms of mean age, clinical severity, gender and comorbidities. Compared to those with non-severe disease, the patients in ICU were more likely to have comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, cancer, cardiac or kidney disease.
Our cohort highlights the high frequency of neuropsychiatric complications related to critical illness and intensive care. Almost half of the patients in our cohort were hospitalized in the ICU (47%). Our findings emphasize that encephalopathy is a major issue in patients with Covid-19. The presence of encephalopathy was strongly associated with Covid-19 infection severity and the presence of comorbidities, which is in keeping with complications of hypoxia and critical illness. The high prevalence of encephalopathy in patients with Covid-19 patients has already been reported, though its mechanisms are not fully understood. Covid-19 encephalopathy seems to be more common in patients with more severe Covid-19-related respiratory disease, associated comorbidities, evidence of multi-organ system dysfunction, including hypoxemia, renal and hepatic impairment, and elevated markers of systemic inflammation 28–30. The association of encephalopathy with greater age and comorbidities has already been reported 31. A recent large-scale cohort also emphasized the frequency of non-specific complications, including toxic/metabolic encephalopathy and hypoxic/ischemic brain injury 32. It is noteworthy that encephalopathy was associated with the risk of death in our cohort.
Critical care polyneuropathy and myopathy were particularly frequent in our patients, affecting 26% of them. Besides classical ICU polyneuropathy, many patients presented with mechanic plexopathy and nerve compressions, probably secondary to prolonged sedation and lying prone, which was usual in the Covid-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. The long duration of critical care, the requirement for high doses of anesthetics and curare, and the frequent association with diabetes could partly explain the particularly high frequency of ICU neuropathy compared to what is usually seen with other viral respiratory infections. Two patients presented with mechanical cranial nerve injuries (XII in one patient; X, XI and XII in one patient) in the setting of critical care, a complication known as Tapia syndrome 33.
Acute cerebrovascular disorders consisted mostly in ischemic strokes. The risk of cerebrovascular disorders was highly associated with the presence of comorbidities. The presence of unusual stroke symptoms at presentation, such as encephalopathy without focal deficit, is noteworthy and was also reported by other authors34. Covid-19 might facilitate ischemic strokes via at least three non-exclusive pathogenic mechanisms: atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, a hypercoagulable state, and cerebral microvasculature injury (endothelitis). Indeed, Covid-19 is commonly complicated by sepsis-induced coagulopathy, induced by a systemic inflammatory response involving endothelial dysfunction and microthrombosis often associated with multi organ failure 35.
These observations of frequent unspecific neurological features contrast with the rarity of syndromes potentially linked to viral neuroinvasion. The question of the neuroinvasiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 is an ongoing debate. Its detection in the CSF has only been reported in a few case studies 6,7. Only seven patients in our cohort fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for encephalitis 21. A recent cohort with 606 patients with neurological signs of Covid-19 reported no encephalitis 32, suggesting this is a very rare complication. None of the patients with encephalitis had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 detection in the CSF. The CSF pleiocytosis without SARS-CoV-2 detection and brain inflammatory lesions seen in our patients and other reported cases of Covid-19 might result from immune-mediated inflammatory mechanisms rather than direct viral invasion. The role of cytokine activation has been widely reported for Covid-19 36,37. Headaches are also proposed to be based on an inflammatory cytokinic mechanism 38. Psychiatric manifestations could also be related to inflammatory mechanisms 39. Neuropathological studies have, to date, failed to demonstrate specific alterations and the majority of neuropathological observations favor the role of critical illness complications 40,41. A recent neuropathological study found evidence of inflammatory brain lesions, with no evidence of brain damage directly caused by the SARS-CoV-2 42.
Other immune-mediated complications, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and myelitis occurred anecdotally in our cohort. It should be stressed that Guillain-Barré syndrome and myelitis had a delayed onset, which is in keeping with a post-infectious inflammatory mechanism. Cranial nerve impairments could often be explained by alternative mechanisms (probable pre-existing inflammatory disorder in one patient, thrombotic mechanism in another and mechanical compressions in a further two).
Although our sample of patients who developed psychiatric symptoms during Covid-19 is small, our findings are in accordance with previously reported data 43. Indeed, our patients mainly suffered from anxiety disorder or depression, and one developed de novo psychosis, obsessive compulsive disorder or bipolar disorder. Long-term follow-up data will be valuable to have an estimation of the risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder, especially for patients with adjustment disorders and acute stress syndrome.
Our study has several limitations. Although the study is retrospective, it was implemented early at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic and data could be collected prospectively by the investigators as they examined new patients. We may have an over representation of complications due to critical illness and critical care as there was a large number of Covid-19-dedicated ICU beds in our institution. We cannot exclude reporting bias and lack of exhaustivity, but the involvement of all physicians of the Department implicated in every step of patient care (ICU, acute hospitalization departments, rehabilitation departments, imaging departments, neurophysiology) limits this bias, especially for the most severe forms of neuropsychiatric manifestations. In stroke patients, one limitation of the study is that we could not determine for all patients the etiology of ischemic strokes and in case of a negative outcome, whether Covid-19 was the trigger.
Conclusion
We report the broad landscape of neuropsychiatric complications in a large cohort of Covid-19 patients. The majority of these complications could be imputed to critical illness, intensive care and systemic inflammation, which contrasts with the paucity of more direct SARS-CoV2-related complications or post-infectious disorders. Further studies are needed to better disentangle the different mechanisms underlying these various symptoms, and to explore potential long-term complications.
Data Availability
Anonymized data is available upon request to the corresponding author by request from any qualified investigator.
Funding
The study received funding from the FIA (Federation Internationale de l’Automobile.)
Financial disclosures
Cécile Delorme received a research grant from the FIA, travel funding from Merz Pharma, Boston Scientific and Medtronic.
Vincent Navarro served as board member for UCB pharma, LivaNova, GW pharma et EISAI. Louise-Laure Mariani has received research support grants from INSERM, JNLF, The L’Oreal Foundation; speech honoraria from CSL, Sanofi-Genzyme, Lundbeck, Teva; consultant for Alzprotect and received travel funding from the Movement Disorders Society, ANAINF, Merck, Merz, Medtronic, Teva and AbbVie, outside the submitted work.
J.C. Corvol served on the scientific advisory boards for Biogen, UCB, Prevail Therapeutic, Idorsia, Ever Pharma, Denali, and has received grants from the Michael J Fox Foundation and Sanofi outside of this work.
The other authors declare no potential financial conflict.
Acknowledgement
The Cohort COVID-19 Neurosciences (CoCo Neurosciences) study supported by the APHP and funded by the generous support of the FIA (Fédération Internationale pour l’Automobile) Foundation and donors of the Paris Brain Institute – ICM. The authors thank the CoCo-Neurosciences study group for their participation in the data collection. The research leading to these results received funding from the program “Investissements d’avenir” ANR-10-IAIHU-06.
The Coco-Neurosciences study group: Steering Committee (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris): Cecile Delorme, Jean-Christophe Corvol, Jean-Yves Delattre, Stephanie Carvalho, Sandrine Sagnes. Scientific Committee (Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris): Bruno Dubois, Vincent Navarro, Celine Louapre, Tanya Stojkovic, Ahmed Idbaih, Charlotte Rosso, David Grabli, Ana Zenovia Gales, Bruno Millet, Benjamin Rohaut, Eleonore Bayen, Sophie Dupont, Gaelle Bruneteau, Stephane Lehericy, Danielle Seilhean, Alexandra Durr, Foudil Lamari, Marion Houot, Vanessa Batista Brochard. Principal investigators: Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris): Sophie Dupont, Catherine Lubetzki, Danielle Seilhean, Pascale Pradat-Diehl, Charlotte Rosso, Khe Hoang-Xuan, Bertrand Fontaine, Lionel Naccache, Philippe Fossati, Isabelle Arnulf, Alexandra Durr, Alexandre Carpentier, Stephane Lehericy, Yves Edel; Rothschild Hospital (Paris): Gilberte Robain, Philippe Thoumie; Avicenne Hospital (Bobigny): Bertrand Degos; Sainte-Anne Hospital (Paris): Tarek Sharshar; Saint-Antoine Hospital (Paris): Sonia Alamowitch, Emmanuelle Apartis-Bourdieu, Charles-Siegried Peretti; Saint-Louis Hospital (Paris): Renata Ursu; Tenon Hospital (Paris): Nathalie Dzierzynski; Charles Foix Hospital (Ivry): Kiyoka Kinugawa Bourron, Joel Belmin, Bruno Oquendo, Eric Pautas, Marc Verny. Co-investigators: Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (Paris): Cecile Delorme, Jean-Christophe Corvol, Jean-Yves Delattre, Yves Samson, Sara Leder, Anne Leger, Sandrine Deltour, Flore Baronnet, Ana Zenovia Gales,Stephanie Bombois, Mehdi Touat, Ahmed Idbaih, Marc Sanson, Caroline Dehais, Caroline Houillier, Florence Laigle-Donadey, Dimitri Psimaras, Agusti Alenton, Nadia Younan, Nicolas Villain, David Grabli, Maria del Mar Amador, Gaelle Bruneteau, Celine Louapre, Louise-Laure Mariani, Nicolas Mezouar, Graziella Mangone, Aurelie Meneret, Andreas Hartmann, Clement Tarrano, David Bendetowicz, Pierre-François Pradat, Michel Baulac, Sara Sambin, Phintip Pichit, Florence Chochon, Adele Hesters, Bastien HerlinAn Hung Nguyen, Valerie Procher, Alexandre Demoule, Elise Morawiec, Julien Mayaux, Morgan Faure, Claire Ewenczyk, Giulia Coarelli, Anna Heinzmann, Tanya Stojkovic, Marion Masingue, Guillaume Bassez, Vincent Navarro, Isabelle An, Yulia Worbe, Virginie Lambrecq, Rabab Debs, Esteban Munoz Musat, Timothee Lenglet, Virginie Lambrecq, Aurelie Hanin, Lydia Chougar, Nathalia Shor, Nadya Pyatigorskaya, Damien Galanaud, Delphine Leclercq, Sophie Demeret, Benjamin Rohaut, Albert Cao, Clemence Marois, Nicolas Weiss, Salimata Gassama, Loic Le Guennec, Vincent Degos, Alice Jacquens, Thomas Similowski, Capucine Morelot-Panzini, Jean-Yves Rotge, Bertrand Saudreau, Bruno Millet, Victor Pitron, Nassim Sarni, Nathalie Girault, Redwan Maatoug, Ana Zenovia Gales, Smaranda Leu, Eleonore Bayen, Lionel Thivard, Karima Mokhtari, Isabelle Plu; Sainte-Anne Hospital (Paris): Bruno Gonçalves; Saint-Antoine Hospital (Paris): Laure Bottin, Marion Yger; Rothschild Hospital (Paris): Gaelle Ouvrard, Rebecca Haddad; Charles Foix Hospital (Ivry): Flora Ketz, Carmelo Lafuente, Christel Oasi. Other Contributors: Associated centers (Lariboisière Hospital, Paris): Bruno Megabarne, Dominique Herve; Clinical Research Associates (ICM, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris): Haysam Salman, Armelle Rametti-Lacroux, Alize Chalançon, Anais Herve, Hugo Royer, Florence Beauzor, Valentine Maheo, Christelle Laganot, Camille Minelli, Aurelie Fekete, Abel Grine, Marie Biet, Rania Hilab, Aurore Besnard, Meriem Bouguerra, Gwen Goudard, Saida Houairi, Saba Al-Youssef, Christine Pires, Anissa Oukhedouma, Katarzyna Siuda-Krzywicka, Tal Seidel Malkinson; (Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris): Hanane Agguini; Data Manager (ICM, Paris): Safia Said; Statistician (ICM, Paris): Marion Houot.
Appendix 1. Author contributions
References
