Abstract
Difficulty using the upper-limb is a major barrier to independence for many patients post-stroke or brain injury. High dose rehabilitation can result in clinically significant improvements in function even years after the incident, however there is still high variability in patient responsiveness to such interventions that cannot be explained by age, sex or time since stroke.
This retrospective study investigated whether prescription of certain CNS-acting drug classes-GABA agonists, antiepileptics and antidepressants-influenced outcomes on the 3 week intensive Queen Square Upper-Limb (QSUL) programme.
For 277 stroke or brain injury patients upper-limb impairment and activity was assessed at admission to the programme and at 6 months post-discharge, using the upper limb component of the Fugl-Meyer (FM), Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). Drug prescriptions were obtained from primary care physicians at referral. Specification curve analysis (SCA) was used to protect against selective reporting results and add robustness to the conclusions of this retrospective study.
GABA agonist prescription had a significant negative effect on upper-limb scores at admission but did not impact programme-induced improvements. There were no effects of antiepileptic drug prescriptions on either admission scores, or improvement during the programme. Antidepressant prescriptions did not impact admission scores but resulted in reduced improvement in upper-limb function, even when accounting for anxiety and depression scores.
These results demonstrate that, when prescribed appropriately, GABA agonists do not impair patient’s ability to benefit from rehabilitation programmes. Patients prescribed antidepressants, however, performed poorer than expected on the QSUL rehabilitation programme. While the reasons for this effect are unclear, identifying these patients prior to admission may allow for better accommodation of differences in their rehabilitation needs.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
A Johnstone is funded by a project grant from the Dunhill Medical Trust. Thanks to all the physiotherapists and occupational therapists at The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, who have treated patients on this programme. Thanks to UCLH Charities, Friends of UCLH and The National Brain Appeal for funding to purchase equipment used in this programme.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was registered with University College London Hospitals (UCLH) National Health Service Trust clinical audit and service development department as a service evaluation. As the project did not involve any change to typical care the UCL/UCLH Joint Research Office and UCL Research Ethics Committee deemed it exempt from requiring ethical approval.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available for credible researchers upon request to Dr Ward. Code will be made available on publication.