Abstract
Eye-tracking is used widely to investigate visual and cognitive processes in the context of electronic medical record systems. We investigated a novel application of eye tracking to collect training data for machine learning-based clinical decision support. Specifically, we recorded the information-seeking behavior of physicians while they used electronic medical records in the context of a specific clinical task. Using data captured by a low-cost eye tracking device, we evaluated the performance of several methods for processing gaze points that were recorded using the device. Our results support the use of a low-cost eye tracking device and relatively simple methods for processing gaze points to record the information-seeking behavior of physicians. The eye-tracking methods and scripts that we developed offer a first step in developing novel uses for eye-tracking for clinical decision support.
Lay summary In the context of electronic medical record systems, eye-tracking is used extensively to explore visual and cognitive processes. We investigated a novel application of eye tracking to collect training data for machine learning-based clinical decision support. We developed and evaluated several methods for processing gaze points that were recorded using a low-cost eye tracking device. The eye-tracking methods and scripts that we developed offer a first step in developing novel uses for eye-tracking for clinical decision support.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R01 LM012095 and T15 LM007059. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We did not recruit patients in this study. The patient electronic medical record (EMR) data that we used were captured or documented as part of routine clinical care. The EMR data were de-identified and the University of Pittsburgh IRB determined that the study constitutes non-human subjects research and waived the need for informed patient consent. The study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh IRB under protocol PRO14020588.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to preserve the privacy of individuals that participated in the study.