The implications of religious event and holidays on the transmission of SARS-CoV2 : the impact of behavioral changes on transmission

Introduction

Since the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic different studies have looked on the transmission pattern and risks for transmission of SARS-CoV2. Different risk factors were studied, including biological, demographic, and behavioral factors. SARS-CoV2 is transmitted through respiratory droplets ⁽¹⁾, hence it was evident that behavioral factors were correlated with increased transmission risk, with large in-person gatherings with no social distancing or public health measures carrying the highest risk ⁽²⁾.

Risk of transmission from an infected case increases with the closeness and duration of contact and is highest with prolonged contact in indoor settings. It has been observed that most local transmissions occur in household contacts, healthcare setting and whenever individuals are in proximity. Risk of transmission also appears high in gatherings ^(3,4,5,6,7). Bahrain has recorded the first case in February 24 and the number of new cases have increased since then ⁽⁸⁾. The authorities soon placed multiple public health regulations to limit the spread, including banning gatherings, restriction of travel, mandatory face mask wearing, working from home, online schooling and a national testing plan ^{(9,10,11,12,13,14)}. The daily recorded cases were noticed to have a correlation with public holidays and social events, especially with Eid and Ashura.

Eid Alfitr is a three-day public holiday in Bahrain. All Muslims celebrate the holiday by having large group prayers in the morning, followed by multiple social gatherings at homes. Like Christmas, it is a festive holiday, and it is common for individuals to visit their families, neighbors, and friends. They would gather for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and short visits to extended family in between. Due to the pandemic, the group prayer was stopped and a public campaign to raise awareness of the importance of staying at home was started.

Ashura is a religious two-day holiday in Bahrain and an event for Muslims. A subset of Muslims has holy religious ceremonies that extend for up to 10 days. Ceremonies are done in large groups and in proximity. However due to the pandemic and banning of indoor gatherings, these ceremonies could continue in small groups outdoors with public health measures.

In this manuscript we study the change in cases and demographics of the newly diagnosed cases before and after two main religious events and holidays in Bahrain: “Eid AlFitr” and “Ashura”.

Methods

Study design

This is a national observational study conducted in Bahrain in September 2020 to compare the number and demographics of all newly diagnosed cases before and after Eid Holiday (religious holiday) and Ashura religious event. A 10 days period before the event was compared to a 10 days period after the event by ten days. This period was allowed for the effect of the event to appear on the population. Figure 1 shows the selected time frames.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Results

There was significant increase in the number of cases of COVID-19 after both Eid Alfitr and Ashura. Most new cases were found in local Bahrainis. The rise was most notable in females, children, and elderly. There was also a significant increase in symptomatic compared to asymptomatic cases.

Discussion

After COVID-19 emerged in Bahrain, the government placed multiple public health regulations to contain the outbreak ⁽¹⁴⁾. Due to these precautionary measures, many Bahrainis stayed at home before Eid Alfitr ⁽¹⁶⁾. This could explain the low number of Bahraini cases (472 cases) back then.

Because of the cultural nature of Eid Alfitr and Ashura, it is no surprise to see the increase in incidence after each event. In both events, the increase in cases was more prominent in Bahrainis because they partake in these events much more than non-Bahrainis. Eid have resulted in 1697 new cases within Bahraini nationals (3.6 times more) and Ashura have resulted in 4438 cases more (3.02 times more)

Both events resulted in an increase in the number of cases across all age groups. The largest margin of increase was witnessed in the extremes of age: 0-19 years old and elderly above 60 years old. With the implementation of “staying at home” and closure of schools, mosques and majlis (indoor gatherings with majority of attendees being elders) children aged 0 to 19 and elders 60 years and older spent most, if not all, of their time at home. This greatly limited the number of cases in these age groups before Eid Alfitr: (153) children and (82) elderlies. At that time, most Bahraini cases were aged 20 to 49. These were working people who still had to attend work and encounter different people, leading them to have a higher risk of COVID-19.

When Eid Alfitr came, it was observed that many families and friends gathered indoors, despite advice to quarantine. Furthermore, it is common for smaller families to gather with similar sized families and visit each other in one big gathering that is usually centered around the elderly of the family. This led to a prominent increase in Bahraini cases. The greatest rise observed was in children, females’ elders aged 60 and above. This is likely due to the abstinence of children, females, and the elderly from much social interaction before Eid Alfitr.

Both Eid Alfitr and Ashura increased the number of cases for both genders greatly. Females exhibited a more drastic increase in percentage of total cases when compared in the before and after periods of both events. Which may suggest that the increase of infection rate cannot attributed to a single gender, since both participated in the events. The general higher number in males could be explained by the higher male to female ration in Bahrain ⁽¹⁷⁾. This could also be explained by gender differences in perceived risk- and risk-taking behaviors described by Byrnes et al ⁽¹⁸⁾.

At all times observed, most non-Bahraini cases were aged between 20 and 49. Most of the non-Bahrainis infected were migrant labor workers, typically in the age group mentioned ⁽¹⁹⁾. The large number of cases in the labor workers could be attributed to poor health education and crowded living conditions. Bahraini cases were the minority of the cases during the beginning of the pandemic. Eid Alfitr could be described as the turning point, where cases distribution in Bahrain tipped towards the Bahraini population. Due to the closeness and nature of the Bahraini culture this tip in the scales escalated and created the increase between Bahraini and Non-Bahrainis cases observed. The increase in proportion of Bahraini to non-Bahraini cases remained consistent until the present day.

It is important to note that both after Eid Alfitr and after Ashura the number of tests has increased by (7%) and (22%), respectively. The number of total cases also increased at both time periods at a much larger extent. Eid holidays have resulted in 1697 cases more when compared to the period before that (1.67 times more). Ashura have resulted in 7803 cases in a 10 days period (2.19 times more). The small increase in testing accompanied by the high increase in total cases indicate that Eid Alfitr and Ashura directly affected the incidence and resulted in higher transmission, and that these results could not have been simply due to more testing alone. This was more apparent when the proportion of positive tests was compared. The increase in number of tests after these events was due to an increase in testing demand. As it was evident that the number of symptomatic cases increased, which also led to an increase in contact tracing and testing too.

The increase in cases and the proportion of positive tests observed in the period after Eid Alfitr was brought down with the measures enforced by a campaign aimed to increase the general awareness and change the behavior in the Bahraini population as a whole. The campaign included posting comparison of cases before and after Eid and posting anonymized contract tracing result which showed the extent of infections in household members ⁽²⁰⁾. This decrease was clear, as it can be observed by the number of cases before the events of Ashura (Table 2). As the period of Ashura started, it contributed greatly to increasing the number of cases and increasing outbreaks in different parts of the country

Before Ashura, the total cases diagnosed were 3539. This was an increase compared to cases before Eid Alfitr (2990 cases). This is a new baseline in cases which can be explained by the change in people’s behavior, especially following reopening measures. However, cases after Eid Alfitr were still higher (4831 cases), implying the significant effect Eid Alfitr had on increasing transmission.

In Ashura, the participation in ceremonies were separated by gender. However, this separation resulted in many small indoor gatherings in proximity with a preacher reciting speeches and chants. These ceremonies extend from two to ten hours per day for two to ten days Tang et al ⁽²¹⁾ stated that indoor gatherings with a person performing or in this case reciting speeches and chants may enable the transmission of the virus through aerosolization and not only droplets. Making such events as superspreading events. This was also reported in a choir rehearsal where 53 out 61 attendees were infected despite adequate precaution for fomite and droplet transmission taken and none of the attendees exhibited symptoms ^(22,23). Miller et al also stated that “this indoor transmission risk may have been increased because of high occupancy, long duration, loud vocalization, and poor ventilation” ⁽²²⁾.

Eid Alfitr effect on the number of cases was largely due to the festive nature of the holiday, where many individuals visit their families, extended families, and friends. Eid Alfitr is celebrated by all Muslim. In comparison, only a subset of Muslims holds religious ceremonies and gatherings in Ashura. The fact that Ashura resulted in such increase in the number of cases among all age groups, especially children and females, can be attributed to the nature of the ceremonies conducted during Ashura.

After both events, symptomatic cases have increased. This could be explained by the higher incidence of COVID-19 in older individual, as it has been reported that younger patients were more likely to be asymptomatic ⁽²⁴⁾. The more severe and symptomatic cases could also be due to different viral strains that have emerged from different clusters due to gatherings, and this might be worth exploring with genomic sequencing.

Public health measures and guidance such as: banning indoor gatherings, online ceremonies and limiting capacity in the participation in the ceremonies were put in place to limit the effect of the religious event. As new cases emerged and contact tracing was done, it was found that people did not adhere to recommended public health safety measures. Many gatherings in proximity were conducted which increased the risk for transmission between the population. Moreover, during these gatherings meals were exchanged between gatherings and individuals which have contributed to the increase in infection rate.

Furthermore, it was observed that due to the decision of limiting the Ashura ceremonies and conducting them online, this has caused many of the small gatherings. As people could not participate in person, many decided to gather in houses of relatives and friends to attend the ceremonies and share the spirituality of Ashura. Which may suggest that providing an online option for something that required a large social gathering may result in many smaller gatherings. One of the large contributors to the spread of infection in these gatherings were individuals that visited multiple gatherings. Such individuals would visit one small gathering for a few hours and then leave to attend a different gathering. This has resulted in gatherings that are at extremely high risks for transmission. Another factor that needs to be considered is the duration of events. Each gathering would last for a minimum of 2 hours and could last up to 6-10 hours on daily bases for the whole period of Ashura. Thus, creating an environment where one positive case could infect more than it can under normal circumstances.

Such events are of extreme importance to people, whether they are ceremonies or family gatherings. Implementing rules and regulation to limit these gatherings is required, however not sufficient. A pre-planned public health plan should be started in advance of these events to raise the public awareness on the risk of gatherings and to improve the public compliance. Moreover, it is also equally important to raise awareness on how to decrease transmission in such events or gatherings, as it is evident that a large number of the population will continueto gather. Personal hygiene, physical distancing, wearing face masks, time limitation and proper ventilation are all measures that can help reduce the risk of transmission in such events and gatherings. ^{(22, 25)}. This could be a crucial measure to decrease the transmission and help fight the pandemic.

Declaration