ABSTRACT
Background For over a decade, the preoperative timeout procedure has been implemented in most pediatric surgery units. In our hospital, a standardized team-timeout is performed before every operation. However, the impact of this intervention has not been systematically studied.
Purpose This study evaluates whether purposefully-introduced errors during the timeout routine are picked up by the operating team members.
Methods After ethics board approval and informed consent, deliberate errors were randomly and clandestinely introduced into the timeout routine for elective surgical procedures by a pediatric surgery attending. Errors were randomly selected among wrong name, site, side, allergy, intervention, birthdate, and gender items. The main outcome measure was how frequent an error was picked up by the team, and by whom.
Results Over the course of 16 months, 1800 operations and timeouts were performed. Errors were randomly introduced in 120 cases (6.7%). Overall, 54% of the errors were picked up, the remainder went unnoticed. Errors were picked up most frequently by an anesthesiologists (64%), followed by nursing staff (28%), residents-in-training (6%) and medical students (1%).
Conclusions Errors in the timeout routine go unnoticed by the team in almost half of cases. Therefore, even if preoperative timeout routines are strictly implemented, mistakes may be overlooked. Hence, the timeout procedure in its current form appears unreliable. Future developments may be useful to improve the quality of the surgical timeout and should be studied in detail.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
https://researchregistry.com (study number 2890)
Funding Statement
Intramural funding only
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Positive ethics board approval was granted (approval number 837.105.17/10939, 2017)by the Ethics Board of the Physician Chamber of the State of Rhineland-Palatinate (Landesaerztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz). In Rhineland-Palatinate, there is a centralized Ethics Board that is independent of individual institution. All research must be cleared through this board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request
