Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality criteria for services

View ORCID ProfileEmma Ladds, View ORCID ProfileAlex Rushforth, View ORCID ProfileSietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, View ORCID ProfileLaiba Husain, View ORCID ProfileTrisha Greenhalgh
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.20211854
Emma Ladds
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Roles: academic clinical fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emma Ladds
Alex Rushforth
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Roles: postdoctoral researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex Rushforth
Sietse Wieringa
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Roles: postdoctoral clinical researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sietse Wieringa
Sharon Taylor
2Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
3Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom
Roles: child psychiatrist, honorary senior lecturer and expert by experience
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clare Rayner
4Independent Occupational Physician, Manchester
Roles: occupational physician and expert by experience
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laiba Husain
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Roles: research assistant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laiba Husain
Trisha Greenhalgh
1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford
Roles: clinical professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Trisha Greenhalgh
  • For correspondence: trish.greenhalgh@phc.ox.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Approximately 10% of patients with Covid-19 experience symptoms beyond 3-4 weeks. Patients call this “long Covid”. We sought to document the lived experience of such patients, their accounts of accessing and receiving healthcare, and their ideas for improving services.

Method We held 55 individual interviews and 8 focus groups (n = 59) with people recruited from UK-based long Covid patient support groups, social media and snowballing. We restricted some focus groups to health professionals since they had already self-organised into online communities. Participants were invited to tell their personal stories and comment on others’ stories. Data were audiotaped, transcribed, anonymised and coded using NVIVO. Analysis incorporated sociological theories of illness, healing, peer support, the clinical relationship, access to care, and service redesign.

Results The sample was 70% female, aged 27-73 years, and comprised White British (74%), Asian (11%), White Other (7%), Black (4%), and Mixed (4%). 27 were doctors and 23 other health professionals. 10% had been hospitalised. Analysis revealed a confusing illness with many, varied and often relapsing-remitting symptoms and uncertain prognosis; a heavy sense of loss and stigma; difficulty accessing and navigating services; difficulty being taken seriously and achieving a diagnosis; disjointed and siloed care (including inability to access specialist services); variation in standards (e.g. inconsistent criteria for seeing, investigating and referring patients); variable quality of the therapeutic relationship (some participants felt well supported while others felt “fobbed off”); and possible critical events (e.g. deterioration after being unable to access services). Emotional touch points in participants’ experiences informed ideas for improving services.

Conclusion Quality principles for a long Covid service should include ensuring access to care, reducing burden of illness, taking clinical responsibility and providing continuity of care, multi-disciplinary rehabilitation, evidence-based investigation and management, and further development of the knowledge base and clinical services.

Study registration NCT04435041

Competing Interest Statement

TG is currently sitting on the oversight group for the long Covid guideline at the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. TG and EL provided evidence to the House of Lords Select Committee on long Covid. CR and ST are members of a long Covid patient support group. Other authors have no relevant interests to declare.

Clinical Trial

NCT04435041

Funding Statement

This research is funded from the following sources: National Institute for Health Research (BRC-1215-20008), ESRC (ES/V010069/1), and Wellcome Trust (WT104830MA). Funders had no say in the planning, execution or writing up of the paper.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee (IRAS Project ID: 283196; REC ref 20/EM0128)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Anonymised data from this qualitative study can be made available to other qualitative researchers on discussion with the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 14, 2020.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality criteria for services
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality criteria for services
Emma Ladds, Alex Rushforth, Sietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh
medRxiv 2020.10.13.20211854; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.20211854
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality criteria for services
Emma Ladds, Alex Rushforth, Sietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh
medRxiv 2020.10.13.20211854; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.13.20211854

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (280)
  • Allergy and Immunology (579)
  • Anesthesia (141)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1955)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (253)
  • Dermatology (186)
  • Emergency Medicine (333)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (702)
  • Epidemiology (11118)
  • Forensic Medicine (8)
  • Gastroenterology (629)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (3192)
  • Geriatric Medicine (309)
  • Health Economics (565)
  • Health Informatics (2048)
  • Health Policy (864)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (788)
  • Hematology (310)
  • HIV/AIDS (684)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (12738)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (708)
  • Medical Education (318)
  • Medical Ethics (92)
  • Nephrology (336)
  • Neurology (2999)
  • Nursing (165)
  • Nutrition (465)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (589)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (614)
  • Oncology (1560)
  • Ophthalmology (478)
  • Orthopedics (185)
  • Otolaryngology (266)
  • Pain Medicine (202)
  • Palliative Medicine (57)
  • Pathology (403)
  • Pediatrics (914)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (382)
  • Primary Care Research (355)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2795)
  • Public and Global Health (5609)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1100)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (635)
  • Respiratory Medicine (764)
  • Rheumatology (340)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (314)
  • Sports Medicine (289)
  • Surgery (347)
  • Toxicology (48)
  • Transplantation (159)
  • Urology (133)